Love this Danny Williams bit

Post Reply
dondada
Heavyweight
Heavyweight
Posts: 8872
Joined: 26 Nov 2003, 10:55

Love this Danny Williams bit

Post by dondada »

http://www.worldboxingnews.net/2011/03/ ... orted.html?

Super headline.

What they don't tell you is that on 2nd March they ALSO ran a story entitled 'Danny Williams to stay happily retired'.

Strangely, that page no longer exists :lol:

We all get it wrong, but, you know, come on...
PhilDJay
Cruiserweight
Posts: 3
Joined: 22 Feb 2011, 15:30

Re: Love this Danny Williams bit

Post by PhilDJay »

Hello Ian,
I ran that story at the request of Spencer Fearon ( I dont know if you read it or not), but obviously the fact that I was one of the first to break it then went out the window. Therefore its only right that Spencer's wrongly attributed article then be deleted as it was of no fault to my reporting.

Cheers.
dondada
Heavyweight
Heavyweight
Posts: 8872
Joined: 26 Nov 2003, 10:55

Re: Love this Danny Williams bit

Post by dondada »

PhilDJay wrote:Hello Ian,
I ran that story at the request of Spencer Fearon ( I dont know if you read it or not), but obviously the fact that I was one of the first to break it then went out the window. Therefore its only right that Spencer's wrongly attributed article then be deleted as it was of no fault to my reporting.

Cheers.
I'm not really sure what you're saying...all I'm saying is that whoever did the headline today was being a bit cheeky :wink:
Alba
Heavyweight
Heavyweight
Posts: 1944
Joined: 28 Jul 2009, 16:05

Re: Love this Danny Williams bit

Post by Alba »

i was confused by this , :witzend:
PhilDJay
Cruiserweight
Posts: 3
Joined: 22 Feb 2011, 15:30

Re: Love this Danny Williams bit

Post by PhilDJay »

Ian 'Mr' McNeilly wrote:
PhilDJay wrote:Hello Ian,
I ran that story at the request of Spencer Fearon ( I dont know if you read it or not), but obviously the fact that I was one of the first to break it then went out the window. Therefore its only right that Spencer's wrongly attributed article then be deleted as it was of no fault to my reporting.

Cheers.
I'm not really sure what you're saying...all I'm saying is that whoever did the headline today was being a bit cheeky :wink:

I just wanted to clear up that we never got it wrong, thats all.

Cheers Ian.
dondada
Heavyweight
Heavyweight
Posts: 8872
Joined: 26 Nov 2003, 10:55

Re: Love this Danny Williams bit

Post by dondada »

I'm not saying you personally reported the story wrongly. But there's no point in saying 'we never got it wrong'. I read a story on the site 'confirming' that Danny Williams wasn't retiring. The story was wrong, ergo the site was wrong.

We've been wrong loads of times...I just thought it was funny that the headline gave the site the big 'un when it ran a directly contradictory story on the same day.

These things happen.
MightyWarrior
Heavyweight
Heavyweight
Posts: 13317
Joined: 23 Jan 2003, 14:01

Re: Love this Danny Williams bit

Post by MightyWarrior »

Eh ? I can't work out what's going on here, it's a bit like the twilight zone. Is that a German website ? It reads like a google translation.
stujones
Heavyweight
Heavyweight
Posts: 27513
Joined: 29 Aug 2003, 15:08

Re: Love this Danny Williams bit

Post by stujones »

As Linda La Hughes would say - "oh me brain"....... Danny wasn't retiring? I thought he already had - now embarking on a comeback.... oh I don't know.
DavidPayne
Heavyweight
Heavyweight
Posts: 6248
Joined: 11 Mar 2004, 11:00

Re: Love this Danny Williams bit

Post by DavidPayne »

Buncey
Heavyweight
Heavyweight
Posts: 405
Joined: 24 Feb 2009, 07:44

Re: Love this Danny Williams bit

Post by Buncey »

Hold the back page!

Adios.
DavidPayne
Heavyweight
Heavyweight
Posts: 6248
Joined: 11 Mar 2004, 11:00

Re: Love this Danny Williams bit

Post by DavidPayne »

Back page?! Them were the days.
DavidPayne
Heavyweight
Heavyweight
Posts: 6248
Joined: 11 Mar 2004, 11:00

Re: Love this Danny Williams bit

Post by DavidPayne »

Whats on the show this week Steve?
PhilDJay
Cruiserweight
Posts: 3
Joined: 22 Feb 2011, 15:30

Re: Love this Danny Williams bit

Post by PhilDJay »

Not liking this "WRONG" stuff, it was Spencer Fearon who corrected me. But anyways lets move on. I've heard Butterbean was to move down to super-flyweight.
Post Reply