Rhodes vs Alvarez
-
Counter-puncher
- Heavyweight

- Posts: 39141
- Joined: 20 May 2008, 11:41
Re: Rhodes vs Alvarez
in the absence of a 'that makes me feel like hanging myself from the nearest tree' emoticon I'll just use this one:
![[icon_witsend.gif] :witzend:](./images/smilies/icon_witsend.gif)
Re: Rhodes vs Alvarez
orbtastic wrote:Maybe it's easier to sling K9 some dough, get him in a nice hotel for a week than it is to grease the wheels of the WBO machine to get some sort of interim or vacant shot against Jones? The WBO seem to have already made Pac their "super" champ anyway.
Jones doesn't want to fight him anyway. That match is dead. Problem is Warren pushed him towards WBO title, only for Pacquiao to decide to keep it. The IBF champion doesn't look great, but would probably need a lot of paying to come to Britain, without being able to sell fight to the US.
-
Tommy Gunn13
- Heavyweight

- Posts: 3290
- Joined: 10 Nov 2008, 13:11
Re: Rhodes vs Alvarez
I agree with what your saying Orb...Rhodes must be right pissed off if it does happen,two boxers(both unproven) at the weight below getting a shot before him...Shockingorbtastic wrote:Nope.Counter-puncher wrote:i only wish I thought you were exaggerating, here.orbtastic wrote:Maybe it's easier to sling K9 some dough, get him in a nice hotel for a week than it is to grease the wheels of the WBO machine to get some sort of interim or vacant shot against Jones? The WBO seem to have already made Pac their "super" champ anyway.
FW wants a title for Brook, seems the easiest option to me.
It's wrong on a number of levels but I doubt FW cares little for Rhodes these days, those days are long gone now as was evidenced when he found out by reading on the internet that other fighters had been parachuted in front of his WBC ranking etc etc.
Re: Rhodes vs Alvarez
Bundrage will wreck Brook; Kell hasn't proven himself against the top men in Europe in his weight division. Taking on a tough world proven man like K9 7lbs up will do his health no good.
Before any of Kells army of admirers jump on me
; I accept that Kell is a top prospect and looks the business. However; he's not fought his way to a World Title shot at Welter yet. He's not been hit hard by anyone yet.
Bundrage has had it harder than Brook; he knows how to dig in and I'd put my money on him getting to Brook late on.
Before any of Kells army of admirers jump on me
Bundrage has had it harder than Brook; he knows how to dig in and I'd put my money on him getting to Brook late on.
-
Counter-puncher
- Heavyweight

- Posts: 39141
- Joined: 20 May 2008, 11:41
Re: Rhodes vs Alvarez
this is true, although it might be equivocated by the fact that Bundrage is absolutely rubbish by world standards.simon fox wrote:Bundrage will wreck Brook; Kell hasn't proven himself against the top men in Europe in his weight division. Taking on a tough world proven man like K9 7lbs up will do his health no good.
Before any of Kells army of admirers jump on me; I accept that Kell is a top prospect and looks the business. However; he's not fought his way to a World Title shot at Welter yet. He's not been hit hard by anyone yet.
Bundrage has had it harder than Brook; he knows how to dig in and I'd put my money on him getting to Brook late on.
Re: Rhodes vs Alvarez
I honestly don't think that Kell has proven he should be in world class.
Bundrage has dragged himself there; he is not the most talented but has been in tough bouts, prevailed and got there.
Boxrec have him at number 4 light middle; he can't be all that rubbish; Brook is in at number 12; 7lbs below at welter.
Bundrage has dragged himself there; he is not the most talented but has been in tough bouts, prevailed and got there.
Boxrec have him at number 4 light middle; he can't be all that rubbish; Brook is in at number 12; 7lbs below at welter.
-
Tommy Gunn13
- Heavyweight

- Posts: 3290
- Joined: 10 Nov 2008, 13:11
Re: Rhodes vs Alvarez
I honestly don't think that Kell has proven he should be in world class.simon fox wrote:I honestly don't think that Kell has proven he should be in world class.
Bundrage has dragged himself there; he is not the most talented but has been in tough bouts, prevailed and got there.
Boxrec have him at number 4 light middle; he can't be all that rubbish; Brook is in at number 12; 7lbs below at welter.
Your right there Simon
Re: Rhodes vs Alvarez
It's not up to Jones if the fight is mandated, which it was looking like it might be? Pac is super champ, they will have an interim or regular champ before summer is here.gobbles wrote:orbtastic wrote:Maybe it's easier to sling K9 some dough, get him in a nice hotel for a week than it is to grease the wheels of the WBO machine to get some sort of interim or vacant shot against Jones? The WBO seem to have already made Pac their "super" champ anyway.
Jones doesn't want to fight him anyway. That match is dead. Problem is Warren pushed him towards WBO title, only for Pacquiao to decide to keep it. The IBF champion doesn't look great, but would probably need a lot of paying to come to Britain, without being able to sell fight to the US.
Re: Rhodes vs Alvarez
orbtastic wrote:It's not up to Jones if the fight is mandated, which it was looking like it might be? Pac is super champ, they will have an interim or regular champ before summer is here.gobbles wrote:orbtastic wrote:Maybe it's easier to sling K9 some dough, get him in a nice hotel for a week than it is to grease the wheels of the WBO machine to get some sort of interim or vacant shot against Jones? The WBO seem to have already made Pac their "super" champ anyway.
Jones doesn't want to fight him anyway. That match is dead. Problem is Warren pushed him towards WBO title, only for Pacquiao to decide to keep it. The IBF champion doesn't look great, but would probably need a lot of paying to come to Britain, without being able to sell fight to the US.
It is up to him. He can fight for another title. He's with Top Rank and doesn't need Brook
-
bad mamma jamma
- Heavyweight

- Posts: 347
- Joined: 15 Jun 2009, 05:31
Re: Rhodes vs Alvarez
on his day graham would have played with him, but does anyone remember graham vs frank grant?DavidPayne wrote:Herol Graham never won a world-title but he got the shots.
Jamie Moore will never have that sense of fulfilment.
However, Herol Graham v Jamie Moore would have been a decent fight wouldn't it?
Re: Rhodes vs Alvarez
WBC no 4, WBC already looking like their title is tied up for the next 12 months.gobbles wrote:orbtastic wrote:It's not up to Jones if the fight is mandated, which it was looking like it might be? Pac is super champ, they will have an interim or regular champ before summer is here.gobbles wrote:
Jones doesn't want to fight him anyway. That match is dead. Problem is Warren pushed him towards WBO title, only for Pacquiao to decide to keep it. The IBF champion doesn't look great, but would probably need a lot of paying to come to Britain, without being able to sell fight to the US.
It is up to him. He can fight for another title. He's with Top Rank and doesn't need Brook
WBA no 2, with that belt held by an unknown Ukranian who doesn't fight in the US, an interim champ etc etc.
IBF no 3, with a completely obscure Solvak who has yet to fight in the US holding the title and with guys ahead of him.
I'd say he's pretty short on options tbh.
Re: Rhodes vs Alvarez
I can remember that fight :( it were a sad day in the Fox household. Grant was a beast at the time though and Herol looked worn and tired. The Herol that smashed Rod Douglas (anyone remember him? he was a hard nut) would have done Frank Grant in. The Herol that beat Pazienza would've beat Frank too.bad mamma jamma wrote:on his day graham would have played with him, but does anyone remember graham vs frank grant?DavidPayne wrote:Herol Graham never won a world-title but he got the shots.
Jamie Moore will never have that sense of fulfilment.
However, Herol Graham v Jamie Moore would have been a decent fight wouldn't it?
-
mickey1975
- Heavyweight

- Posts: 23131
- Joined: 02 Mar 2009, 12:54
Re: Rhodes vs Alvarez
I was at that fight.Elland Road.simon fox wrote:I can remember that fight :( it were a sad day in the Fox household. Grant was a beast at the time though and Herol looked worn and tired. The Herol that smashed Rod Douglas (anyone remember him? he was a hard nut) would have done Frank Grant in. The Herol that beat Pazienza would've beat Frank too.bad mamma jamma wrote:on his day graham would have played with him, but does anyone remember graham vs frank grant?DavidPayne wrote:Herol Graham never won a world-title but he got the shots.
Jamie Moore will never have that sense of fulfilment.
However, Herol Graham v Jamie Moore would have been a decent fight wouldn't it?
Re: Rhodes vs Alvarez
Frank was a machine that night; I watched on telly. A very strong man. A pal of mine sparred him and said he was a real handful and very fit.
Re: Rhodes vs Alvarez
A very weight weaken Graham turned up that night.....he won nearly every round then just run out of steam.....To even think Jamie won have a chance is a bit silly
-
mickey1975
- Heavyweight

- Posts: 23131
- Joined: 02 Mar 2009, 12:54
Re: Rhodes vs Alvarez
I thought Grant was doing well to be honest,mate.SOUTHPAW wrote:A very weight weaken Graham turned up that night.....he won nearly every round then just run out of steam.....To even think Jamie won have a chance is a bit silly
Re: Rhodes vs Alvarez
i've not heard anyone associated with brook say they want the fight with K9 or that it has even been offered (though apparently Frank W mentioned it in his column?)
i agree with those who say kell needs tougher fights at 10'7 as he builds towards the ultimate goal of becoming a genuine, long-standing world champ at that weight, his natural one.
i agree with those who say kell needs tougher fights at 10'7 as he builds towards the ultimate goal of becoming a genuine, long-standing world champ at that weight, his natural one.
Re: Rhodes vs Alvarez
Paul Thomas had Graham losing only one round......But Grant turned that all round...mickey1975 wrote:I thought Grant was doing well to be honest,mate.SOUTHPAW wrote:A very weight weaken Graham turned up that night.....he won nearly every round then just run out of steam.....To even think Jamie won have a chance is a bit silly
Re: Rhodes vs Alvarez
Yep..................... 
-
nelsoninfour
- Heavyweight

Re: Rhodes vs Alvarez
Rhodes deserves a chance. How many Boxers ranked in ring mag ratings and cant get a title shot? Politics ruining his opportunities. Key to boxing now is not talent its more how much the promoter can make from you. Some UK promoters use bullying tactics and make fighters feel they the only option. Think Rhodes will beat the man with no VISA hopefully in MExico so all his fans can drink Tequila whilst wearing sombreros. Then the match with Alverez must happen. If he cant take out hatton who is a welter then think rhodes could take his power as for most his career he been taking shots from middle weight. 
-
wesley05
- Heavyweight

Re: Rhodes vs Alvarez
Good call sonnelsoninfour wrote:Rhodes deserves a chance. How many Boxers ranked in ring mag ratings and cant get a title shot? Politics ruining his opportunities. Key to boxing now is not talent its more how much the promoter can make from you. Some UK promoters use bullying tactics and make fighters feel they the only option. Think Rhodes will beat the man with no VISA hopefully in MExico so all his fans can drink Tequila whilst wearing sombreros. Then the match with Alverez must happen. If he cant take out hatton who is a welter then think rhodes could take his power as for most his career he been taking shots from middle weight.