the past compared to now

Post Reply
kevinmalpas
Cruiserweight
Posts: 80
Joined: 20 Feb 2011, 07:39

the past compared to now

Post by kevinmalpas »

was looking through some old records, these old boys used to fight 20 round fights and sometimes their fights were only a month apart.... take a peep

http://boxrec.com/list_bouts.php?human_ ... &cat=boxer

are professionals pussys nowadays? christ, this fella made his debut in a 10 rounder. After watching someone knackered the other night in prizefighter, after 6 x 3 minute rounds with a break after 3 of them? why on earth is their stamina so bad, surely in this day and age with all of the available nutrients and sports psychologists we could at least develop human beings with a bit of stamina!
yiddo14
Heavyweight
Heavyweight

Re: the past compared to now

Post by yiddo14 »

The kind of stamina that chaps from the past possessed can only be gained through fighting so often.
Coco
Heavyweight
Heavyweight
Posts: 28517
Joined: 08 May 2007, 05:42

Re: the past compared to now

Post by Coco »

The longer bouts are fought at a much slower pace
Londonirish
Heavyweight
Heavyweight
Posts: 3064
Joined: 20 Nov 2008, 13:02

Re: the past compared to now

Post by Londonirish »

Coco wrote:The longer bouts are fought at a much slower pace


Yep, they didnt have as much skill, the quality of the Boxing was not as good.
kevinmalpas
Cruiserweight
Posts: 80
Joined: 20 Feb 2011, 07:39

Re: the past compared to now

Post by kevinmalpas »

Londonirish wrote:
Coco wrote:The longer bouts are fought at a much slower pace


Yep, they didnt have as much skill, the quality of the Boxing was not as good.

you make me laugh... cant you see my point?
DIRT SUGAR
Heavyweight
Heavyweight
Posts: 1200
Joined: 29 Aug 2003, 11:48

Re: the past compared to now

Post by DIRT SUGAR »

Was talking about modern footballers today and how they seem to be much more injury prone and couple of lads I was speaking to, we kind of agreed that they are much more athletic today, far more finely tuned and this in itself brings problems. They are so athletic and fit that illness and injuries are harder to get over. The old sponge on the injured ankle and a couple of games off doesn't quite do the trick. Does that make any sense?

Seems they are more like your middle distance runners who take longer to get over injury and viruses as they operate at such a high level of fitness all of the time, with very little rest periods.

Maybe that's the case with boxers.
el_grande_mauro_mina
Lightweight
Posts: 11215
Joined: 24 Dec 2017, 11:54

Re: the past compared to now

Post by el_grande_mauro_mina »

My dad talks about this, even though the diet was worse than it is now (bread and dripping, no fresh fruit or pasta or decent meat) the people were fitter because there were no cars! Or not to the ordinary person anyway, he always tells me to note old films when you see people left the factories after a shift that the people ran out of the factories, and this is after a hard 8-12 hour labour intensive shift. In those days you ran and walked everywhere unless you were rich and could afford a little car.

Tommy Farr talked about a fight he had in London when he started out - he walked home back to Tonypandy from London! Took him a few days and it was quite common by all accounts.

Boxers today are more finely tuned, more athletic and more healthier (if you exclude the steroid takers and the ones who use recreational drugs) but stamina seems to be a problem.
Scrap
Heavyweight
Heavyweight
Posts: 1604
Joined: 29 May 2006, 05:24

Re: the past compared to now

Post by Scrap »

Great Topic, in 36 was it, when Jesse Owins won the 100 metres. Running on a all weather track, His time would have been 9/8. I once read that in the 30s, there were 3 million active Boxers.
Scottrf
Cruiserweight
Posts: 1146
Joined: 30 Nov 2010, 05:43

Re: the past compared to now

Post by Scottrf »

Scrap wrote:Great Topic, in 36 was it, when Jesse Owins won the 100 metres. Running on a all weather track, His time would have been 9/8. I once read that in the 30s, there were 3 million active Boxers.
Read 'The Arc of Boxing' by Mike Silver. Lot of convincing arguments for why the 20s-50s was the golden era.
Post Reply