It was a good insight on a very decent and underrated pro.
Well done Mr Mcneilly
Dan Dares wrote: And if the queen didn't watch Big John take Larry O out, she should have. I've heard she likes watching a good tear up.
A vision of a sculpture of Big John McDermott has jumped into my brain now, & will probably never ever leave.Dan Dares wrote:F**k Michalangelo and Tracey Emin, I want a Big John McDermott Sculpture. Priceless.
Ah, it's a shame people are so cynical... 8)MachoMan09 wrote:I also had him winning the first fight with Fury but it wasn't clear cut and ultimately it is a loss on his record. Had he been lighter and even fitter, it is likely the result would have been a clear win for John. On the second fight, I'm not going to call bullshit on his glandular fever claims but I wouldn't mind seeing a doctor's note.Ian 'Mr' McNeilly wrote:Ha ha!
Have to say Macho, you're probably right...however, I don't agree with your verdicts on his losses to Fury. The first one he 'won', I think - and that's probably the fittest he's been; the second the chap had glandular fever, as it turned out.D
John is a good hard working pro and a much better boxer than want a lot of you give him credit for and will give of of Europe's or British heavyweight a good fight and would beat most of themIan 'Mr' McNeilly wrote:Ah, it's a shame people are so cynical... 8)MachoMan09 wrote:I also had him winning the first fight with Fury but it wasn't clear cut and ultimately it is a loss on his record. Had he been lighter and even fitter, it is likely the result would have been a clear win for John. On the second fight, I'm not going to call bullshit on his glandular fever claims but I wouldn't mind seeing a doctor's note.Ian 'Mr' McNeilly wrote:Ha ha!
Have to say Macho, you're probably right...however, I don't agree with your verdicts on his losses to Fury. The first one he 'won', I think - and that's probably the fittest he's been; the second the chap had glandular fever, as it turned out.D
Was robbed in the first tyson fightFtmPress wrote:John is a good hard working pro and a much better boxer than want a lot of you give him credit for and will give of of Europe's or British heavyweight a good fight and would beat most of themIan 'Mr' McNeilly wrote:Ah, it's a shame people are so cynical... 8)MachoMan09 wrote: I also had him winning the first fight with Fury but it wasn't clear cut and ultimately it is a loss on his record. Had he been lighter and even fitter, it is likely the result would have been a clear win for John. On the second fight, I'm not going to call bullshit on his glandular fever claims but I wouldn't mind seeing a doctor's note.D
FIGHTFANs wrote:Agreed rob by a bad ????FtmPress wrote:John is a good hard working pro and a much better boxer than want a lot of you give him credit for and will give of of Europe's or British heavyweight a good fight and would beat most of themIan 'Mr' McNeilly wrote: Ah, it's a shame people are so cynical... 8)
Was robbed in the first tyson fight![]()
![]()
Not, not necessarilly - depends on the writers. Steve Farhood for BM is one of the worst writers with his hyperbole and awful attempts at 'comedy'.Dan Dares wrote:Great piece, just read it Nice one Sir Ian.
I don't normally buy the boxing mags, but this was a pretty good issue. And if the queen didn't watch Big John take Larry O out, she should have. I've heard she likes watching a good tear up.
Reggae - for clarity - by melodramatic, you mean Boxing News, right?
And this sums up the argument about 'taste' - Farhood has been one of my favourites since I was a kid. I love his humour! Then again, I used to p*ss myself laughing at Eric Armit's columns due to all the nicknames but I think that was just me :Preggaereggae wrote:Not, not necessarilly - depends on the writers. Steve Farhood for BM is one of the worst writers with his hyperbole and awful attempts at 'comedy'.Dan Dares wrote:Great piece, just read it Nice one Sir Ian.
I don't normally buy the boxing mags, but this was a pretty good issue. And if the queen didn't watch Big John take Larry O out, she should have. I've heard she likes watching a good tear up.
Reggae - for clarity - by melodramatic, you mean Boxing News, right?
Ha I don't think everyone will get that, but it's worth it for those who do!Wrists wrote:Frankly I thought this was the 'second worst boxing article' I seen this week......................
oh lord....I bet you used to love Jim Brady!!!Ian 'Mr' McNeilly wrote:And this sums up the argument about 'taste' - Farhood has been one of my favourites since I was a kid. I love his humour! Then again, I used to p*ss myself laughing at Eric Armit's columns due to all the nicknames but I think that was just me :Preggaereggae wrote:Not, not necessarilly - depends on the writers. Steve Farhood for BM is one of the worst writers with his hyperbole and awful attempts at 'comedy'.Dan Dares wrote:Great piece, just read it Nice one Sir Ian.
I don't normally buy the boxing mags, but this was a pretty good issue. And if the queen didn't watch Big John take Larry O out, she should have. I've heard she likes watching a good tear up.
Reggae - for clarity - by melodramatic, you mean Boxing News, right?
Ha ha - I'll never slag Brady off, even though a lot of his writing wasn't to my taste. One of the most hardcore boxing writers ever the way he faced down bullying. I remember him getting done for calling some South Pacific fighter a cannibal or something.reggaereggae wrote:oh lord....I bet you used to love Jim Brady!!!Ian 'Mr' McNeilly wrote:And this sums up the argument about 'taste' - Farhood has been one of my favourites since I was a kid. I love his humour! Then again, I used to p*ss myself laughing at Eric Armit's columns due to all the nicknames but I think that was just me :Preggaereggae wrote: Not, not necessarilly - depends on the writers. Steve Farhood for BM is one of the worst writers with his hyperbole and awful attempts at 'comedy'.
Should be, I got it last Tuesday, so I think it would have been released a week ago.J-C wrote:Is the issue in the shops now, or have others got it on subscription? Couldn't find it in any of the news agents near me.
i sparred with john a few years back he is a very clever fighter all he was lacking was self belief but i think he's found that of late and i wouldn't be suprised if he went and won a british, commonwealth, or even a european title right fights at the right time ect ectMachoMan09 wrote:I agree to a point. I have always defended John's ability at the same time as criticising his diet. He would stand a far greater chance of realising his true potential if he got into the best shape he could. He has never done that.FtmPress wrote:John is a good hard working pro and a much better boxer than want a lot of you give him credit for and will give of of Europe's or British heavyweight a good fight and would beat most of themIan 'Mr' McNeilly wrote: Ah, it's a shame people are so cynical... 8)