Khan took an unusual amount of punishment that night for a winning fighter. I think he should have taken a long time out to properly recuperate. He may not have completely recovered when he faces McCloskey.The Bush wrote:Khan came of age that night, and will just be much better than McCloskey in every department!!!!!
Eddie Hearn: McCloskey will be tougher for Khan than Maidana
-
nobby_nobbins
- Heavyweight

- Posts: 654
- Joined: 22 Apr 2008, 16:07
Re: Eddie Hearn: McCloskey will be tougher for Khan than Maidana
-
Happy Slapper
- Heavyweight

- Posts: 499
- Joined: 20 Jul 2008, 16:22
Re: Eddie Hearn: McCloskey will be tougher for Khan than Maidana
Can see this being like Khan v Salita to be honest with you. No chance. Literally no chance.Captain Hook wrote:This 'Khan bloke' is a world class, elite fighter who's learnt from his only loss and come back stronger.rickshere wrote:Name ain't Paul, its Rick. But as your asking my weight could be better, bit out of hand at mo. Training? Seriously need to get started doing some. By the way, because I'm not tossing off over this Khan bloke dont mean I'm 'McCloskey'Captain Hook wrote: How's your weight, Paul? Training going well?
McCloskey is a good fighter, but he's out of his depth here. Can see this being a bit like Khan v St Clair. One way traffic.
That said, I hope he's competitive so he gets other opportunities down the line.
-
Eraserhead
- Heavyweight

- Posts: 554
- Joined: 14 Dec 2007, 18:46
Re: Eddie Hearn: McCloskey will be tougher for Khan than Maidana
No he won't.
I stopped listening to Eddie Hearn when he used mentally unstable former Olympic gold medallist to boost his own profile and ego a few months back. Everything Hearn said for those eight weeks made me reach for the sick bag.
I stopped listening to Eddie Hearn when he used mentally unstable former Olympic gold medallist to boost his own profile and ego a few months back. Everything Hearn said for those eight weeks made me reach for the sick bag.
Re: Eddie Hearn: McCloskey will be tougher for Khan than Maidana
Oh yeah, lets not forget Khan v St Clair, and while we're at it what about Khan v Barrera?! I mean Khan beat world class fighters there...Even a legand in Barrera!Captain Hook wrote:This 'Khan bloke' is a world class, elite fighter who's learnt from his only loss and come back stronger.rickshere wrote:Name ain't Paul, its Rick. But as your asking my weight could be better, bit out of hand at mo. Training? Seriously need to get started doing some. By the way, because I'm not tossing off over this Khan bloke dont mean I'm 'McCloskey'Captain Hook wrote: How's your weight, Paul? Training going well?
McCloskey is a good fighter, but he's out of his depth here. Can see this being a bit like Khan v St Clair. One way traffic.
That said, I hope he's competitive so he gets other opportunities down the line.
-
Captain Hook
- Heavyweight

- Posts: 4730
- Joined: 07 May 2007, 09:40
Re: Eddie Hearn: McCloskey will be tougher for Khan than Maidana
Then you're in the minority.
And exactly what would St Clair have done to Khan in his prime, given that he was a world champion only a year or two before they fought? I can tell you, he'd have lost a wide points decision.
I admire your support of McCloskey, he's a decent fighter, but he's out of his depth.
And exactly what would St Clair have done to Khan in his prime, given that he was a world champion only a year or two before they fought? I can tell you, he'd have lost a wide points decision.
I admire your support of McCloskey, he's a decent fighter, but he's out of his depth.
Re: Eddie Hearn: McCloskey will be tougher for Khan than Maidana
Boxingchat - Mickey Mouse - W@rrenboxingchat wrote:Eddie - Benjiman Button - Hearn.
-
jaywillo1983
- Heavyweight

- Posts: 35
- Joined: 27 Jan 2010, 11:38
Re: Eddie Hearn: McCloskey will be tougher for Khan than Maidana
This fight shouldn't be happening anyway, not because Mcloskey doesn't deserve it but because Khan should never still be world champ anyway. 99 out of 100 refs would of stopped the Maidana fight in the 10th, a definate TKO. Amir Khan is a very good boxer, but for the newspapers to call khan a true warrior the following day was a joke. He was out on his feet. The true warrior was Marcos Maidana.
-
slapbangwhallop
- Cruiserweight
- Posts: 2031
- Joined: 13 Dec 2010, 08:27
Re: Eddie Hearn: McCloskey will be tougher for Khan than Maidana
Not sure I agree with that.jaywillo1983 wrote:This fight shouldn't be happening anyway, not because Mcloskey doesn't deserve it but because Khan should never still be world champ anyway. 99 out of 100 refs would of stopped the Maidana fight in the 10th, a definate TKO. Amir Khan is a very good boxer, but for the newspapers to call khan a true warrior the following day was a joke. He was out on his feet. The true warrior was Marcos Maidana.
-
jaywillo1983
- Heavyweight

- Posts: 35
- Joined: 27 Jan 2010, 11:38
Re: Eddie Hearn: McCloskey will be tougher for Khan than Maidana
You wernt watching the same fight as me thenslapbangwhallop wrote:Not sure I agree with that.jaywillo1983 wrote:This fight shouldn't be happening anyway, not because Mcloskey doesn't deserve it but because Khan should never still be world champ anyway. 99 out of 100 refs would of stopped the Maidana fight in the 10th, a definate TKO. Amir Khan is a very good boxer, but for the newspapers to call khan a true warrior the following day was a joke. He was out on his feet. The true warrior was Marcos Maidana.
-
MightyWarrior
- Heavyweight

- Posts: 13283
- Joined: 23 Jan 2003, 14:01
Re: Eddie Hearn: McCloskey will be tougher for Khan than Maidana
Yes, out on his feet....and didn't go down & didn't quit. That's a true warrior. If not, what is ?jaywillo1983 wrote:but for the newspapers to call khan a true warrior the following day was a joke. He was out on his feet.
Re: Eddie Hearn: McCloskey will be tougher for Khan than Maidana
The fight should have been stopped? LOLjaywillo1983 wrote:You wernt watching the same fight as me thenslapbangwhallop wrote:Not sure I agree with that.jaywillo1983 wrote:This fight shouldn't be happening anyway, not because Mcloskey doesn't deserve it but because Khan should never still be world champ anyway. 99 out of 100 refs would of stopped the Maidana fight in the 10th, a definate TKO. Amir Khan is a very good boxer, but for the newspapers to call khan a true warrior the following day was a joke. He was out on his feet. The true warrior was Marcos Maidana.
Maidana had Khan in trouble but couldn't catch him clean and finish him off with another big shot after that. The referee did the right thing, and this was proved when Khan came out with a clear head in the 11th and held on for victory. It wasn't as though he was taking a sickening level of punishment or anything.
-
Captain Hook
- Heavyweight

- Posts: 4730
- Joined: 07 May 2007, 09:40
Re: Eddie Hearn: McCloskey will be tougher for Khan than Maidana
jaywillo1983 wrote:You wernt watching the same fight as me thenslapbangwhallop wrote:Not sure I agree with that.jaywillo1983 wrote:This fight shouldn't be happening anyway, not because Mcloskey doesn't deserve it but because Khan should never still be world champ anyway. 99 out of 100 refs would of stopped the Maidana fight in the 10th, a definate TKO. Amir Khan is a very good boxer, but for the newspapers to call khan a true warrior the following day was a joke. He was out on his feet. The true warrior was Marcos Maidana.
I do love the people who come on with less than 10 posts to criticise Khan, they're just so balanced in their opinions.
-
alexpaterson
- Heavyweight

- Posts: 4310
- Joined: 22 Feb 2009, 11:22
Re: Eddie Hearn: McCloskey will be tougher for Khan than Maidana
I'm actually looking forward to this one now, thr more I think about the more chance I give McCloskey! He's got an awkward style, if he gets his sometimes sloppy defence sorted and if he isn't over awed I think he gives Khan a tough night.
Re: Eddie Hearn: McCloskey will be tougher for Khan than Maidana
You forgot to mention Barrera.....Captain Hook wrote:Then you're in the minority.
And exactly what would St Clair have done to Khan in his prime, given that he was a world champion only a year or two before they fought? I can tell you, he'd have lost a wide points decision.
I admire your support of McCloskey, he's a decent fighter, but he's out of his depth.
Re: Eddie Hearn: McCloskey will be tougher for Khan than Maidana
Khan deserved that win totally. Yes, he got a proper pasting in the 10th, and yes, a lot of refs (not 99 out of 100, but the majority) would have stopped it. But the ref that night didn't. I reckon Roach/Ariza were gonna pull him out if he looked dodgy in the 11th, but he/they didn't.jaywillo1983 wrote:You wernt watching the same fight as me thenslapbangwhallop wrote:Not sure I agree with that.jaywillo1983 wrote:This fight shouldn't be happening anyway, not because Mcloskey doesn't deserve it but because Khan should never still be world champ anyway. 99 out of 100 refs would of stopped the Maidana fight in the 10th, a definate TKO. Amir Khan is a very good boxer, but for the newspapers to call khan a true warrior the following day was a joke. He was out on his feet. The true warrior was Marcos Maidana.
I have never seen anyone near that weight class take a beating like that and not go down. A definite 10/8 round for Maidana. If Khan did it 'unaided' then he fully deserves to be considered among the elite. He won most of the rounds, and i thought the judges had it pretty much right.
I think McClosky will get figured out pretty early on, and will have big problems with Khan's speed.
Re: Eddie Hearn: McCloskey will be tougher for Khan than Maidana
Easy night for Khan in my opinion.
I hope Mcloskey makes a good account of himself but cant really see it happening.
2nd or 3rd round stoppage, referee stepping in and stopping it with Mckloskey still on his feet but being overwhelmed with punches. Now thats a prediction! Lol.
I hope Mcloskey makes a good account of himself but cant really see it happening.
2nd or 3rd round stoppage, referee stepping in and stopping it with Mckloskey still on his feet but being overwhelmed with punches. Now thats a prediction! Lol.
-
jaywillo1983
- Heavyweight

- Posts: 35
- Joined: 27 Jan 2010, 11:38
Re: Eddie Hearn: McCloskey will be tougher for Khan than Maidana
johnswan1 wrote:The fight should have been stopped? LOLjaywillo1983 wrote:You wernt watching the same fight as me thenslapbangwhallop wrote: Not sure I agree with that.
Maidana had Khan in trouble but couldn't catch him clean and finish him off with another big shot after that. The referee did the right thing, and this was proved when Khan came out with a clear head in the 11th and held on for victory. It wasn't as though he was taking a sickening level of punishment or anything.
I have just watched the 10 th round back again and for 1 min 25 seconds khan through 0 pinches to Maidanas 69. So try and tell me that he was'nt taking punishment
Re: Eddie Hearn: McCloskey will be tougher for Khan than Maidana
i agree the ref done the right thing. but the fact that khan went for a CAT scan after the fight proves he had a tough nite. its not often its only the winner that goes for a scan after a fight. any hoo surley khan has too much in every department for mcckoskey?johnswan1 wrote:The fight should have been stopped? LOLjaywillo1983 wrote:You wernt watching the same fight as me thenslapbangwhallop wrote: Not sure I agree with that.
Maidana had Khan in trouble but couldn't catch him clean and finish him off with another big shot after that. The referee did the right thing, and this was proved when Khan came out with a clear head in the 11th and held on for victory. It wasn't as though he was taking a sickening level of punishment or anything.
-
Captain Hook
- Heavyweight

- Posts: 4730
- Joined: 07 May 2007, 09:40
Re: Eddie Hearn: McCloskey will be tougher for Khan than Maidana
The Barrera bout was cynical match making. He beat up on a faded legend and then it was stopped. It was a waste of time and did nothing for his career other than adding a HOFamer to his CV.rickshere wrote:You forgot to mention Barrera.....Captain Hook wrote:Then you're in the minority.
And exactly what would St Clair have done to Khan in his prime, given that he was a world champion only a year or two before they fought? I can tell you, he'd have lost a wide points decision.
I admire your support of McCloskey, he's a decent fighter, but he's out of his depth.
Does that add to your argument that Mc will beat Amir, that he beat Barrera unconvincingly? Give me a break.
Re: Eddie Hearn: McCloskey will be tougher for Khan than Maidana
No it doesn't add to my argument but I mentioned both St Clair and Barrera, that Khan beat two opponents way past their best yet he's now some kind of 'super star' because he beat them. You only came back with with St Clair and dismissed Barrera. Barrera was totally washed up compared to what he was. I'm just pointing it out as many seem to be sucked in.Captain Hook wrote:The Barrera bout was cynical match making. He beat up on a faded legend and then it was stopped. It was a waste of time and did nothing for his career other than adding a HOFamer to his CV.rickshere wrote:You forgot to mention Barrera.....Captain Hook wrote:Then you're in the minority.
And exactly what would St Clair have done to Khan in his prime, given that he was a world champion only a year or two before they fought? I can tell you, he'd have lost a wide points decision.
I admire your support of McCloskey, he's a decent fighter, but he's out of his depth.
Does that add to your argument that Mc will beat Amir, that he beat Barrera unconvincingly? Give me a break.
Re: Eddie Hearn: McCloskey will be tougher for Khan than Maidana
Not like somebody with the surname Hearn to grossly exaggerate in an attempt to sell his event. 
Re: Eddie Hearn: McCloskey will be tougher for Khan than Maidana
I see Eddie Hearn's talking like a promoter who's been around for years, i.e. he's full of sh!t
D
-
Matt Teague
- Heavyweight

- Posts: 318
- Joined: 16 Aug 2004, 16:19
Re: Eddie Hearn: McCloskey will be tougher for Khan than Maidana
Scottrf wrote:I think he's right. But only in the same way as he was right about Harrison beating Haye.
haha i thought the same
-
Captain Hook
- Heavyweight

- Posts: 4730
- Joined: 07 May 2007, 09:40
Re: Eddie Hearn: McCloskey will be tougher for Khan than Maidana
St Clair wasn't washed-up, it's fair to say Barrera was. But they are not the only two people he's beaten who were/are quality.rickshere wrote:No it doesn't add to my argument but I mentioned both St Clair and Barrera, that Khan beat two opponents way past their best yet he's now some kind of 'super star' because he beat them. You only came back with with St Clair and dismissed Barrera. Barrera was totally washed up compared to what he was. I'm just pointing it out as many seem to be sucked in.Captain Hook wrote:The Barrera bout was cynical match making. He beat up on a faded legend and then it was stopped. It was a waste of time and did nothing for his career other than adding a HOFamer to his CV.rickshere wrote: You forgot to mention Barrera.....
Does that add to your argument that Mc will beat Amir, that he beat Barrera unconvincingly? Give me a break.
Malignaggi? Maidana? And he's aiming for Bradley, who's top man at the weight. Let's not forget he's an Olympic silver medallist too.
Nobody is sucked in, certainly not me. He's a quality fighter, and a credible world champion, you can't deny that, try as you might. He's a rung or two above McCloskey and that will show.
Re: Eddie Hearn: McCloskey will be tougher for Khan than Maidana
What a Crock!!jaywillo1983 wrote:This fight shouldn't be happening anyway, not because Mcloskey doesn't deserve it but because Khan should never still be world champ anyway. 99 out of 100 refs would of stopped the Maidana fight in the 10th, a definate TKO. Amir Khan is a very good boxer, but for the newspapers to call khan a true warrior the following day was a joke. He was out on his feet. The true warrior was Marcos Maidana.