Hands Of Stone film.
-
SUGARRAYSMELEE
- Light Heavyweight
- Posts: 139
- Joined: 31 Jan 2011, 03:27
Re: Hands Of Stone film.
Yeah, I heard something about this around 5 months ago. I was excited but I didn't think it would materialize due to the fact that it wouldn't have a very broad appeal. I'm happy to see that it is being made, great cast so far.
I wonder who they will cast as Ray Leonard? Any thoughts?
They could get Ronald Hearns to play his father if Tommy Hearns is set to be in the movie, I understand it focuses mostly on the
'No Mas' fight, obviously Duran wants to clear his name once and for all.
I wonder who they will cast as Ray Leonard? Any thoughts?
They could get Ronald Hearns to play his father if Tommy Hearns is set to be in the movie, I understand it focuses mostly on the
'No Mas' fight, obviously Duran wants to clear his name once and for all.
-
Goodnight, Irene
- Heavyweight

- Posts: 9463
- Joined: 24 Sep 2007, 04:43
Re: Hands Of Stone film.
Anyone know anything about the lead?
Pacino. Damn, that's exciting.
Pacino. Damn, that's exciting.
-
SaadOffTheDeck
- Heavyweight

- Posts: 19602
- Joined: 04 Jun 2009, 07:38
Re: Hands Of Stone film.
Pacino is shot. The last decade plus his idea of acting is screaming.
Re: Hands Of Stone film.
Jamie Foxx would be perfect as Leonard.SUGARRAYSMELEE wrote:Yeah, I heard something about this around 5 months ago. I was excited but I didn't think it would materialize due to the fact that it wouldn't have a very broad appeal. I'm happy to see that it is being made, great cast so far.
I wonder who they will cast as Ray Leonard? Any thoughts?
They could get Ronald Hearns to play his father if Tommy Hearns is set to be in the movie, I understand it focuses mostly on the
'No Mas' fight, obviously Duran wants to clear his name once and for all.
Robert Carlisle as Buchanan too.
-
Goodnight, Irene
- Heavyweight

- Posts: 9463
- Joined: 24 Sep 2007, 04:43
Re: Hands Of Stone film.
That's probably fair, but call it sentimentality on my part. He's not much worse than present-day De Niro, who no one dares criticise.SaadOffTheDeck wrote:Pacino is shot. The last decade plus his idea of acting is screaming.
-
SaadOffTheDeck
- Heavyweight

- Posts: 19602
- Joined: 04 Jun 2009, 07:38
Re: Hands Of Stone film.
I honestly haven't seen anything good from Bobby in years either. Al was great. But prime vs prime, much like in the Godfather, Deniro was his daddy.
-
Diamond WEAPON
- Heavyweight

- Posts: 1729
- Joined: 19 Nov 2006, 01:32
Re: Hands Of Stone film.
I thought they both did well in Righteous Kill. Both guys can still act, but the quality of movies in general went down quite a bit in the 2000's and only barely seemed to pick up in the last couple of years as far as artistic value goes. Neither have had much work to suit them for most of this time.SaadOffTheDeck wrote:I honestly haven't seen anything good from Bobby in years either. Al was great. But prime vs prime, much like in the Godfather, Deniro was his daddy.
Bernal is an excellent actor. He's to Latin American audiences what Pacino and De Niro were to English speaking ones in their heyday. He has great range and is built a bit like Duran as well, so visually he should look the part as well, he won't be a freakin Light Heavyweight Mickey Ward at least.
-
SaadOffTheDeck
- Heavyweight

- Posts: 19602
- Joined: 04 Jun 2009, 07:38
Re: Hands Of Stone film.
Diamond WEAPON wrote:I thought they both did well in Righteous Kill. Both guys can still act, but the quality of movies in general went down quite a bit in the 2000's and only barely seemed to pick up in the last couple of years as far as artistic value goes. Neither have had much work to suit them for most of this time.SaadOffTheDeck wrote:I honestly haven't seen anything good from Bobby in years either. Al was great. But prime vs prime, much like in the Godfather, Deniro was his daddy.
Bernal is an excellent actor. He's to Latin American audiences what Pacino and De Niro were to English speaking ones in their heyday. He has great range and is built a bit like Duran as well, so visually he should look the part as well, he won't be a freakin Light Heavyweight Mickey Ward at least.
I couldn't make it through Righteous Kill, horrendous.
Edit: Agreed that movies suck these days. There must be a shortage of writers because all they do is murder classics like Arthur with pointless remakes.
-
Diamond WEAPON
- Heavyweight

- Posts: 1729
- Joined: 19 Nov 2006, 01:32
Re: Hands Of Stone film.
I don't know what it is. I was pleasantly surprised by several movies in the last couple years however. 2002-2008 was like a barren wasteland of filmmaking.SaadOffTheDeck wrote:Diamond WEAPON wrote:I thought they both did well in Righteous Kill. Both guys can still act, but the quality of movies in general went down quite a bit in the 2000's and only barely seemed to pick up in the last couple of years as far as artistic value goes. Neither have had much work to suit them for most of this time.SaadOffTheDeck wrote:I honestly haven't seen anything good from Bobby in years either. Al was great. But prime vs prime, much like in the Godfather, Deniro was his daddy.
Bernal is an excellent actor. He's to Latin American audiences what Pacino and De Niro were to English speaking ones in their heyday. He has great range and is built a bit like Duran as well, so visually he should look the part as well, he won't be a freakin Light Heavyweight Mickey Ward at least.
I couldn't make it through Righteous Kill, horrendous.
Edit: Agreed that movies suck these days. There must be a shortage of writers because all they do is murder classics like Arthur with pointless remakes.
-
Goodnight, Irene
- Heavyweight

- Posts: 9463
- Joined: 24 Sep 2007, 04:43
Re: Hands Of Stone film.
In their primes? Gimme Pacino any day of the week. Just my take. Its not purely preferential, either. I just flat think of him as the better actor.SaadOffTheDeck wrote:I honestly haven't seen anything good from Bobby in years either. Al was great. But prime vs prime, much like in the Godfather, Deniro was his daddy.
-
Diamond WEAPON
- Heavyweight

- Posts: 1729
- Joined: 19 Nov 2006, 01:32
Re: Hands Of Stone film.
I'd say it's a crapshoot for me. Pacino was excellent in Dog Day Afternoon and DeNiro equally so for different reasons in Taxi Driver, then you've got The Deer Hunter, Scarface, Scent of A Woman, Goodfellas, etc. And finally the two of them together on screen in Heat, where both put on great performances in the midst of shooting the shit out of Los Angeles.Goodnight, Irene wrote:In their primes? Gimme Pacino any day of the week. Just my take.SaadOffTheDeck wrote:I honestly haven't seen anything good from Bobby in years either. Al was great. But prime vs prime, much like in the Godfather, Deniro was his daddy.
Both of them were truly incredible actors, they're like Barrera and Morales, minus the hatred and trying to beat each other to death.
-
SaadOffTheDeck
- Heavyweight

- Posts: 19602
- Joined: 04 Jun 2009, 07:38
Re: Hands Of Stone film.
I consider DeNiro to be the GOAT by a substantial margin. I don't even know who I would have second.Goodnight, Irene wrote:In their primes? Gimme Pacino any day of the week. Just my take. Its not purely preferential, either. I just flat think of him as the better actor.SaadOffTheDeck wrote:I honestly haven't seen anything good from Bobby in years either. Al was great. But prime vs prime, much like in the Godfather, Deniro was his daddy.
The statement was a small joke. You know, he played Vito and Al played Michael?
-
SaadOffTheDeck
- Heavyweight

- Posts: 19602
- Joined: 04 Jun 2009, 07:38
Re: Hands Of Stone film.
Scarface was a fun Movie. But it wasn't some kind of acting master class.Diamond WEAPON wrote:I'd say it's a crapshoot for me. Pacino was excellent in Dog Day Afternoon and DeNiro equally so for different reasons in Taxi Driver, then you've got The Deer Hunter, Scarface, Scent of A Woman, Goodfellas, etc. And finally the two of them together on screen in Heat, where both put on great performances in the midst of shooting the shit out of Los Angeles.Goodnight, Irene wrote:In their primes? Gimme Pacino any day of the week. Just my take.SaadOffTheDeck wrote:I honestly haven't seen anything good from Bobby in years either. Al was great. But prime vs prime, much like in the Godfather, Deniro was his daddy.
Both of them were truly incredible actors, they're like Barrera and Morales, minus the hatred and trying to beat each other to death.
I found Heat to be a huge letdown. Not that I hated it, but I expected the two of them together to be much better than it was. DeNiro should have gotten away.
-
Diamond WEAPON
- Heavyweight

- Posts: 1729
- Joined: 19 Nov 2006, 01:32
Re: Hands Of Stone film.
I know, I'm just saying that between the two of them you could make a pretty incredible marathon of the films they starred in.SaadOffTheDeck wrote:Scarface was a fun Movie. But it wasn't some kind of acting master class.Diamond WEAPON wrote:I'd say it's a crapshoot for me. Pacino was excellent in Dog Day Afternoon and DeNiro equally so for different reasons in Taxi Driver, then you've got The Deer Hunter, Scarface, Scent of A Woman, Goodfellas, etc. And finally the two of them together on screen in Heat, where both put on great performances in the midst of shooting the shit out of Los Angeles.Goodnight, Irene wrote: In their primes? Gimme Pacino any day of the week. Just my take.
Both of them were truly incredible actors, they're like Barrera and Morales, minus the hatred and trying to beat each other to death.
I found Heat to be a huge letdown. Not that I hated it, but I expected the two of them together to be much better than it was. DeNiro should have gotten away.
-
SaadOffTheDeck
- Heavyweight

- Posts: 19602
- Joined: 04 Jun 2009, 07:38
Re: Hands Of Stone film.
No doubt about that, but if you put them side by side it would be surprising how much Bobby's resume dwarfs Al.
-
BO Selecta
- Heavyweight

- Posts: 140
- Joined: 11 Dec 2005, 11:01
Re: Hands Of Stone film.
You're right, it could only be Ronald Hearns to play his father, as he's the spitting image Tommy.SUGARRAYSMELEE wrote:Yeah, I heard something about this around 5 months ago. I was excited but I didn't think it would materialize due to the fact that it wouldn't have a very broad appeal. I'm happy to see that it is being made, great cast so far.
I wonder who they will cast as Ray Leonard? Any thoughts?
They could get Ronald Hearns to play his father if Tommy Hearns is set to be in the movie, I understand it focuses mostly on the
'No Mas' fight, obviously Duran wants to clear his name once and for all.
Just a shame he can't fight like his father.
They could get Colin McMillan to play Sugar Ray Leonard.
-
Goodnight, Irene
- Heavyweight

- Posts: 9463
- Joined: 24 Sep 2007, 04:43
Re: Hands Of Stone film.
The late Pete Postlethwaite is the greatest actor I ever saw. Better than De Niro and Pacino, IMO.
-
SaadOffTheDeck
- Heavyweight

- Posts: 19602
- Joined: 04 Jun 2009, 07:38
Re: Hands Of Stone film.
I've never heard of him.
-
Goodnight, Irene
- Heavyweight

- Posts: 9463
- Joined: 24 Sep 2007, 04:43
Re: Hands Of Stone film.
SaadOffTheDeck wrote:I've never heard of him.

Just don't call De Niro (or anyone) the best actor of all-time until you see Postlethwaite in In The Name Of The Father.
-
Goodnight, Irene
- Heavyweight

- Posts: 9463
- Joined: 24 Sep 2007, 04:43
Re: Hands Of Stone film.
Thanks. Glad to know he's someone worth watching. I hope this movie kicks as much ass as Duran did in his heyday...
-
Goodnight, Irene
- Heavyweight

- Posts: 9463
- Joined: 24 Sep 2007, 04:43
Re: Hands Of Stone film.
Did you hear the rumours about Cruise playing Duran? They were circulating for a while (not sure if it was in relation to this production, however)...The Dark Destroyer wrote:He's an obvious choice really, but you know how Hollywood fucks these things up. I'm sceptical about Pacino, but I'm sure he's just been added to get the film made, an actor not widely known like Bernal doesn't haven enough clout on his own.
-
SaadOffTheDeck
- Heavyweight

- Posts: 19602
- Joined: 04 Jun 2009, 07:38
Re: Hands Of Stone film.
LOL, I'm familiar with Tommy Lee jones.Goodnight, Irene wrote:SaadOffTheDeck wrote:I've never heard of him.
Just don't call De Niro (or anyone) the best actor of all-time until you see Postlethwaite in In The Name Of The Father.
-
SaadOffTheDeck
- Heavyweight

- Posts: 19602
- Joined: 04 Jun 2009, 07:38
Re: Hands Of Stone film.
Ah, Mr Kobayashi. Never seen In The name Of The father. I'll check it out.
-
Goodnight, Irene
- Heavyweight

- Posts: 9463
- Joined: 24 Sep 2007, 04:43
Re: Hands Of Stone film.
Tommy is giving you his vaunted pained expression of disbelief, Saad. Best to heed the mans stare :)
Re: Hands Of Stone film.
deniro and pacino both stopped developing as actors.
rather than getting more subtle and reflected with age,
like anthony hopkins, they preferred to capitalize on
their massive screen presence. from a certain age on
this is just a fading thing and if you do still rely on it
too heavily you are ... fading.
rather than getting more subtle and reflected with age,
like anthony hopkins, they preferred to capitalize on
their massive screen presence. from a certain age on
this is just a fading thing and if you do still rely on it
too heavily you are ... fading.