The only hypocrite here is you as in your previous post you're saying you don't make assumptions and yet you've made massive assumptions here regarding other posters' views.rickshere wrote:"Taken time to look around"? I'm not a wstalker wishing to act detective routing through peoples past posts, I'm interested in whats being said now and I have an opinion on whats said now, I couldn't care less whats been said before, infact your highlighting how hypocrytical you and the like can e...Deserter wrote:Now here's the thing... either you are an old poster pretending to be new, or you are a new poster displaying utter ignorance with regards to what's gone on here historically.rickshere wrote: Yes your right, I dont have a hidden agenda I find it strange when someone comes on here wishing for a fighter to lose because they change promoters and why based on assumtions. People seem to forget, fighters are their own 'boss' they dont work for anyone, the managers, trainers and promoters work for them, they all get the reward out the fighter and like any 'boss' who employers workers he's going to want the best to work for him and if he feels his employee isn't getting him the best or feels he can get better out of someone else working for him he'll make those adjustments, yes buisness is ruthless at times but thats the way of the buisness world. Why should it be Ok when managers or promoters dont re new a contract with a fighter but when a 'successful' fighter doesn't re new they are frawned apon? And thats all that has obviously has happened here, Munroe hasn't broken any contract from what I can gather, he as every boxer has one shot at this sport, the side of it promoters and managers are in they have plenty of shots, they have many more years with fighters coming and going.
If, instead of charging round throwing insults at everyone, you'd taken the time to take a look around, you'd have seen plenty of occasions where various posters, including me, have been critical of the promoter-boxer relationship and its one-sided nature at times.
You're also still managing to spectacularly miss the point most people are making, which is that of course Munroe has the right to self-determination, but there's a right/professional way of doing that.
The fact you've also managed to hurl insults and mangle the English language in addition to this just adds to the laughable nature of your contribution to date.
