Round by Round Khan bill.

ERIC GUY
Heavyweight
Heavyweight
Posts: 1656
Joined: 30 Jan 2009, 21:13

Re: Round by Round Khan bill.

Post by ERIC GUY »

any streams
leforge
Heavyweight
Heavyweight
Posts: 7790
Joined: 04 Mar 2005, 12:44

Re: Round by Round Khan bill.

Post by leforge »

That was not a bad cut at all! Shit stoppage!
DIRT SUGAR
Heavyweight
Heavyweight
Posts: 1200
Joined: 29 Aug 2003, 11:48

Re: Round by Round Khan bill.

Post by DIRT SUGAR »

Cut wasn't so bad but blood was pouring down into McCloskey's eyes. You can't go on like that here. If that'd been on the same bill as Maidana v Morales last week it'd have continued... and McCloskey, five rounds down, with blood pouring into his eye would have had to try to turn it around.... I don't think he would have, not that we'll ever know.

McCloskey's not done himself any harm at all, he fought well and wasn't 'beaten' so's to speak.
exittored
Heavyweight
Heavyweight
Posts: 1565
Joined: 19 Apr 2008, 19:40

Re: Round by Round Khan bill.

Post by exittored »

charlieb wrote:
stujones wrote:It was during, before and after Charlie..... He was seething like Barry - but he was dissapointed.
Not from what I saw.

What I saw was McCloskey getting rocked earlier in the round and then calmly talking to the ref before it was waved off and then there was a bit of protest.

I've downed a few though, so that may have been just me seeing things. :KO:
Yeah on reflection i think you're right...i don't think McCloskey fancied it any more and this was his way out of the fight. I think if the Interviewer's had bothered to actually talk to the Doctor he may have confirmed that McCloskey didn't want to fight any more.
TheCobra
Heavyweight
Heavyweight
Posts: 3450
Joined: 01 Jan 2009, 15:11

Re: Round by Round Khan bill.

Post by TheCobra »

Just disappointing really, unsatisfactory way to end a fight. The cut wasn't THAT bad, they should have let him carry on at least another round and see how he dealt with it and whether the corner could get on top of it, it wasn't exactly spurting blood.

Khan was comfortable in the fight but I agree certainly wasn't lookng vintage, I don't feel that McCloskey had done anything, but was boxing to a plan and didn't look to have expended loads of energy. But I can't see that the fight would have gone any other way than a Khan win.
crusader
Heavyweight
Heavyweight
Posts: 16875
Joined: 19 Jan 2009, 20:14

Re: Round by Round Khan bill.

Post by crusader »

keithmoonhangover wrote:
crusader wrote:
keithmoonhangover wrote: Of course, but you may be talking about cuts where the blood is not going directly into the eye.
Why not give McCloskey another round to see if the blood would even impact his performance? Look at what Morales did with one eye.
In reality it's down to the ref or doctor. Maybe you could let him go on, but just imagine trying to conentrate with something in your eye. Then imagine a guy punching you while you blink. Good stoppage.
Boxing is a tough sport, that type of stuff is par for the course and McCloskey had already been thrrough 6 rounds of being punched, so it's not like he couldn't handle it. Again, many fighters have fought on and done well with much worse injuries. You act like the cut would completely change the way he fought (and you even brought brain damage into the discussion), but what are you basing that on? The guy deserved at least one more round, then we could see just how big of a factor the cut would be.
TheCobra
Heavyweight
Heavyweight
Posts: 3450
Joined: 01 Jan 2009, 15:11

Re: Round by Round Khan bill.

Post by TheCobra »

Steve Collins is talking biased nonsense. Rematch is NEVER gona happen unless Khan's career takes a turn for the worse.
stujones
Heavyweight
Heavyweight
Posts: 27489
Joined: 29 Aug 2003, 15:08

Re: Round by Round Khan bill.

Post by stujones »

I do you think McCloskey would do against the likes of Judah?
Old bones Ian
Heavyweight
Heavyweight
Posts: 11805
Joined: 13 Jul 2004, 07:33

Re: Round by Round Khan bill.

Post by Old bones Ian »

stujones wrote:I do you think McCloskey would do against the likes of Judah?
not alot
Ketchel
Heavyweight
Heavyweight
Posts: 866
Joined: 17 Nov 2008, 14:18

Re: Round by Round Khan bill.

Post by Ketchel »

Bad Karma just followed this fight all week. Unsatisfactory all round. Off Khan goes now to fight in the States and will only be back when he is beaten there.
keithmoonhangover
Cruiserweight
Posts: 16960
Joined: 16 Sep 2010, 10:42

Re: Round by Round Khan bill.

Post by keithmoonhangover »

crusader wrote:
keithmoonhangover wrote:
crusader wrote: Why not give McCloskey another round to see if the blood would even impact his performance? Look at what Morales did with one eye.
In reality it's down to the ref or doctor. Maybe you could let him go on, but just imagine trying to conentrate with something in your eye. Then imagine a guy punching you while you blink. Good stoppage.
Boxing is a tough sport, that type of stuff is par for the course and McCloskey had already been thrrough 6 rounds of being punched, so it's not like he couldn't handle it. Again, many fighters have fought on and done well with much worse injuries. You act like the cut would completely change the way he fought (and you even brought brain damage into the discussion), but what are you basing that on? The guy deserved at least one more round, then we could see just how big of a factor the cut would be.
What am I basing it on? I'm basing it on trying to focus your eyes with warm liquid running into your eye.
jtourettes
Heavyweight
Heavyweight
Posts: 822
Joined: 20 Feb 2009, 07:24

Re: Round by Round Khan bill.

Post by jtourettes »

stujones wrote:I do you think McCloskey would do against the likes of Judah?
Get starched as Judah has some serious power.
crusader
Heavyweight
Heavyweight
Posts: 16875
Joined: 19 Jan 2009, 20:14

Re: Round by Round Khan bill.

Post by crusader »

keithmoonhangover wrote:
crusader wrote:
keithmoonhangover wrote: In reality it's down to the ref or doctor. Maybe you could let him go on, but just imagine trying to conentrate with something in your eye. Then imagine a guy punching you while you blink. Good stoppage.
Boxing is a tough sport, that type of stuff is par for the course and McCloskey had already been thrrough 6 rounds of being punched, so it's not like he couldn't handle it. Again, many fighters have fought on and done well with much worse injuries. You act like the cut would completely change the way he fought (and you even brought brain damage into the discussion), but what are you basing that on? The guy deserved at least one more round, then we could see just how big of a factor the cut would be.
What am I basing it on? I'm basing it on trying to focus your eyes with warm liquid running into your eye.
Something which plenty of fighters have dealt with successfully.
TheCobra
Heavyweight
Heavyweight
Posts: 3450
Joined: 01 Jan 2009, 15:11

Re: Round by Round Khan bill.

Post by TheCobra »

keithmoonhangover wrote:
crusader wrote:
keithmoonhangover wrote: In reality it's down to the ref or doctor. Maybe you could let him go on, but just imagine trying to conentrate with something in your eye. Then imagine a guy punching you while you blink. Good stoppage.
Boxing is a tough sport, that type of stuff is par for the course and McCloskey had already been thrrough 6 rounds of being punched, so it's not like he couldn't handle it. Again, many fighters have fought on and done well with much worse injuries. You act like the cut would completely change the way he fought (and you even brought brain damage into the discussion), but what are you basing that on? The guy deserved at least one more round, then we could see just how big of a factor the cut would be.
What am I basing it on? I'm basing it on trying to focus your eyes with warm liquid running into your eye.
Do you mean jizz?
leforge
Heavyweight
Heavyweight
Posts: 7790
Joined: 04 Mar 2005, 12:44

Re: Round by Round Khan bill.

Post by leforge »

exittored wrote:
charlieb wrote:
stujones wrote:It was during, before and after Charlie..... He was seething like Barry - but he was dissapointed.
Not from what I saw.

What I saw was McCloskey getting rocked earlier in the round and then calmly talking to the ref before it was waved off and then there was a bit of protest.

I've downed a few though, so that may have been just me seeing things. :KO:
Yeah on reflection i think you're right...i don't think McCloskey fancied it any more and this was his way out of the fight. I think if the Interviewer's had bothered to actually talk to the Doctor he may have confirmed that McCloskey didn't want to fight any more.
Your a khan fan you talking shit pal!
keithmoonhangover
Cruiserweight
Posts: 16960
Joined: 16 Sep 2010, 10:42

Re: Round by Round Khan bill.

Post by keithmoonhangover »

Ketchel wrote:Bad Karma just followed this fight all week. Unsatisfactory all round. Off Khan goes now to fight in the States and will only be back when he is beaten there.
I agree mate. Good luck to Khan fighting out there and having the guts to take on Bradley et al.
Ketchel
Heavyweight
Heavyweight
Posts: 866
Joined: 17 Nov 2008, 14:18

Re: Round by Round Khan bill.

Post by Ketchel »

If that had of been Ricky Hatton in that ring tonight. No way in a million years would that fight have been stopped. The cut he had against Thaxton was 10 times worse. The corner should had time to work on it.
banjo
Heavyweight
Heavyweight
Posts: 26432
Joined: 20 Nov 2007, 03:17

Re: Round by Round Khan bill.

Post by banjo »

Steve Collins needs to go back to B&Q
keithmoonhangover
Cruiserweight
Posts: 16960
Joined: 16 Sep 2010, 10:42

Re: Round by Round Khan bill.

Post by keithmoonhangover »

crusader wrote:
keithmoonhangover wrote:
crusader wrote: Boxing is a tough sport, that type of stuff is par for the course and McCloskey had already been thrrough 6 rounds of being punched, so it's not like he couldn't handle it. Again, many fighters have fought on and done well with much worse injuries. You act like the cut would completely change the way he fought (and you even brought brain damage into the discussion), but what are you basing that on? The guy deserved at least one more round, then we could see just how big of a factor the cut would be.
What am I basing it on? I'm basing it on trying to focus your eyes with warm liquid running into your eye.
Something which plenty of fighters have dealt with successfully.

McCloskey was struggling before the cut, imagine what it would have been like he had continued.
Deno1986
Heavyweight
Heavyweight
Posts: 5349
Joined: 25 Jul 2009, 06:58

Re: Round by Round Khan bill.

Post by Deno1986 »

The Dark Destroyer wrote:I haven't seen it, had to listen on the radio at work, I don't want to say anything bad till I see it, but did anyone else get the feeling of inevitability when the doctor got involved? I knew as soon as they said it on the radio.
I was really surprised the way the doctor got into the ring and was on top of McCloskey before he knew it. Usually the doctor waits at the rope until the ref brings the boxer over. Crap stoppage.
crusader
Heavyweight
Heavyweight
Posts: 16875
Joined: 19 Jan 2009, 20:14

Re: Round by Round Khan bill.

Post by crusader »

keithmoonhangover wrote:
crusader wrote:
keithmoonhangover wrote: What am I basing it on? I'm basing it on trying to focus your eyes with warm liquid running into your eye.
Something which plenty of fighters have dealt with successfully.

McCloskey was struggling before the cut, imagine what it would have been like he had continued.
You have no idea how he would have performed if the fight went on. Erik Morales fought better with his one eye 100% closed.
U.F.O
Heavyweight
Heavyweight
Posts: 279
Joined: 20 Dec 2008, 19:38

Re: Round by Round Khan bill.

Post by U.F.O »

Just listening to Khans interview on five live,

not very likeable at all is he ?, no class whatsoever
Last edited by U.F.O on 16 Apr 2011, 18:19, edited 1 time in total.
Newport Daz
Cruiserweight
Posts: 687
Joined: 31 Aug 2010, 07:26

Re: Round by Round Khan bill.

Post by Newport Daz »

Disappointing for Mcloskey, but lets ignore the Steve Collins Irish bias. Khan won all 6 rounds on every judge's card. In the last round Khan was starting to tee off on Mcloskey. To say that Mcloskey could have won is like saying I could win the lottery. Possible, but unlikely. People are going overboard because Mcloskey did better than expected, not because it was a really close fight. I don't see what Khan has to gain by taking a rematch.
keithmoonhangover
Cruiserweight
Posts: 16960
Joined: 16 Sep 2010, 10:42

Re: Round by Round Khan bill.

Post by keithmoonhangover »

The Dark Destroyer wrote:I haven't seen it, had to listen on the radio at work, I don't want to say anything bad till I see it, but did anyone else get the feeling of inevitability when the doctor got involved? I knew as soon as they said it on the radio.
The ref looked at his eye from a foot away and thought it was serious enough to call the doctor. The Doctor ( a man with years of training and experience) looked at the cut from inches away and thought it was serioius enough to stop the fight.

Yet some people on here think they know better. :roll:
keithmoonhangover
Cruiserweight
Posts: 16960
Joined: 16 Sep 2010, 10:42

Re: Round by Round Khan bill.

Post by keithmoonhangover »

crusader wrote:
keithmoonhangover wrote:
crusader wrote: Something which plenty of fighters have dealt with successfully.

McCloskey was struggling before the cut, imagine what it would have been like he had continued.
You have no idea how he would have performed if the fight went on. Erik Morales fought better with his one eye 100% closed.
Neither do you, but you think you know better than the ref and the doctor and you weren't even in the ring.
Post Reply