Newport Daz wrote:Disappointing for Mcloskey, but lets ignore the Steve Collins Irish bias. Khan won all 6 rounds on every judge's card. In the last round Khan was starting to tee off on Mcloskey. To say that Mcloskey could have won is like saying I could win the lottery. Possible, but unlikely. People are going overboard because Mcloskey did better than expected, not because it was a really close fight. I don't see what Khan has to gain by taking a rematch.
Good post, but I would like to see McCloskey continue to fight beyond EBU level. There might be vacant title fights in the near future, or Zab Judah - could be intriguing. I still fancy Khan to beat Bradley.
Newport Daz wrote:Disappointing for Mcloskey, but lets ignore the Steve Collins Irish bias. Khan won all 6 rounds on every judge's card. In the last round Khan was starting to tee off on Mcloskey. To say that Mcloskey could have won is like saying I could win the lottery. Possible, but unlikely. People are going overboard because Mcloskey did better than expected, not because it was a really close fight. I don't see what Khan has to gain by taking a rematch.
Good post, but I would like to see McCloskey continue to fight beyond EBU level. There might be vacant title fights in the near future, or Zab Judah - could be intriguing. I still fancy Khan to beat Bradley.
I fancy Bradley for that one, should be a classic. I'll happily pay £15 for that.
keithmoonhangover wrote:
McCloskey was struggling before the cut, imagine what it would have been like he had continued.
You have no idea how he would have performed if the fight went on. Erik Morales fought better with his one eye 100% closed.
Neither do you, but you think you know better than the ref and the doctor and you weren't even in the ring.
Of course I don't know what would have happened, but if the fight was allowed to go on another round, we would actually know how the cut affected McCloskey. We wouldn't need to hypothisize about it.
keithmoonhangover wrote:
Good post, but I would like to see McCloskey continue to fight beyond EBU level. There might be vacant title fights in the near future, or Zab Judah - could be intriguing. I still fancy Khan to beat Bradley.
I fancy Bradley for that one, should be a classic. I'll happily pay £15 for that.[/quote]
Khan should win by accidental headbutt, this fight was a re-run of the Barrera result.
crusader wrote:
McCloskey was struggling before the cut, imagine what it would have been like he had continued.
You have no idea how he would have performed if the fight went on. Erik Morales fought better with his one eye 100% closed.
Neither do you, but you think you know better than the ref and the doctor and you weren't even in the ring.
Of course I don't know what would have happened, but if the fight was allowed to go on another round, we would actually know how the cut affected McCloskey. We wouldn't need to hypothisize about it.[/quote]
Sorry, you didn't answer, do you know better than the doctor at ringside?
The Dark Destroyer wrote:I haven't seen it, had to listen on the radio at work, I don't want to say anything bad till I see it, but did anyone else get the feeling of inevitability when the doctor got involved? I knew as soon as they said it on the radio.
The ref looked at his eye from a foot away and thought it was serious enough to call the doctor. The Doctor ( a man with years of training and experience) looked at the cut from inches away and thought it was serioius enough to stop the fight.
Yet some people on here think they know better. :
imagine it was your man Tyson fury being stopped your be changing your tune! Your always parsing him on here!
The Dark Destroyer wrote:I haven't seen it, had to listen on the radio at work, I don't want to say anything bad till I see it, but did anyone else get the feeling of inevitability when the doctor got involved? I knew as soon as they said it on the radio.
The ref looked at his eye from a foot away and thought it was serious enough to call the doctor. The Doctor ( a man with years of training and experience) looked at the cut from inches away and thought it was serioius enough to stop the fight.
Yet some people on here think they know better. :
imagine it was your man Tyson fury being stopped your be changing your tune! Your always parsing him on here!
I like Fury, but I'd respect the doctor's decision 100%.
What alarmed me is that the doctor seemed to be waving it off before he even wiped it to see how deep it was. My original response was bad cut - seeing him in the interview after, it looked like a nothing cut.
I always like to edge on the side of caution, so can see what Keithmoonhangover is saying. However, lets not kid ourselves and say there have been some incompetent Doctors and officials out there. Look at Khan vs Barrera, how that went beyond the first round is beyond me! Conversely we can say how can the Dr stop the fight without even wiping the cut to see the rate its bleeding and properly assess its depth.
keithmoonhangover wrote:
McCloskey was struggling before the cut, imagine what it would have been like he had continued.
You have no idea how he would have performed if the fight went on. Erik Morales fought better with his one eye 100% closed.
Neither do you, but you think you know better than the ref and the doctor and you weren't even in the ring.
Of course I don't know what would have happened, but if the fight was allowed to go on another round, we would actually know how the cut affected McCloskey. We wouldn't need to hypothisize about it.[/quote]
Sorry, you didn't answer, do you know better than the doctor at ringside?[/quote]
I believe everyone can make errors. Judges and refs are highly trained and experienced as well, yet they eff up all the time, as any boxing fan should know. I don't believe it is any different when it comes to the doctors. Khan was the house fighter and they get all the advantages. I don't think for one second that the fight would have been stopped if Khan had suffered the same cut and was down on the cards.
Barry Hearn (McCLoskey's Promoter) saying his fighter has "7 stitches" only. Not alot compared to some fighter injuries of the past. He seems to have a point.
baulks wrote:Barry Hearn (McCLoskey's Promoter) saying his fighter has "7 stitches" only. Not alot compared to some fighter injuries of the past. He seems to have a point.
Would he have been allowed to have continued in Prizefighter?
Fecking garbage stoppage, it was a hairline cut on the brow where it meets the nose.
That doctor should stay out of the fight game he aint got the stomach for it.
I was watching Curry/Jones earlier today now that was a cut worthy of a stoppage like the grand canyon in his nose.
leforge wrote:
The ref looked at his eye from a foot away and thought it was serious enough to call the doctor. The Doctor ( a man with years of training and experience) looked at the cut from inches away and thought it was serioius enough to stop the fight.
Yet some people on here think they know better. :
imagine it was your man Tyson fury being stopped your be changing your tune! Your always parsing him on here!
I like Fury, but I'd respect the doctor's decision 100%.
Like I said, I haven't seen it, but all I heard was that he should have been allowed to let his team work on it at least once. Shocking really when you think of the cuts Ricky Hatton fought through in the MEN.
When you see it you might agree or you might not. The worst feeling for me as a boxing fan is seeing a guy lying motionless on the floor and everyone with thier fingers crossed, hoping he gets up and doesn't go into a coma.
I;m not saying that was going to happen, but the possibility of it happening is increased greatly by letting some one fight with blood running into one eye.
Last edited by keithmoonhangover on 16 Apr 2011, 18:39, edited 1 time in total.
Khan was fornicating patronising, 'Paul needs to be protected '? not his exact words but ffs he's a bloody good proffesional boxer much like yourself Amir...
He wasn't the one flailing in his last fight
Final round wrote:Khan was effing patronising, 'Paul needs to be protected '? not his exact words but ffs he's a bloody good proffesional boxer much like yourself Amir...
He wasn't the one flailing in his last fight
I agree. It would have been a far less controversial stoppage than this one if Khan was stopped against Maidana.
Khan needs to think a bit harder before he talks about fighters needing protecting.
