Terry O'Connor should be ashamed!
Terry O'Connor should be ashamed!
Enough said really always scores fights completelty wrongly and the board do nothing it is a disgrace tbh, but still the board won't do anything ahwell. I thought Simpson would by one or two rounds
Re: Terry O'Connor should be ashamed!
He awful! Simpson was robbed again!Camcas wrote:Enough said really always scores fights completelty wrongly and the board do nothing it is a disgrace tbh, but still the board won't do anything ahwell. I thought Simpson would by one or two rounds
Re: Terry O'Connor should be ashamed!
Like the first fight, I thought Simpson won, but it was very close and could have gone either way. 118-112 is an epic joke of a card though.
-
el_grande_mauro_mina
- Lightweight
- Posts: 11215
- Joined: 24 Dec 2017, 11:54
Re: Terry O'Connor should be ashamed!
Is anyone outraged anymore? Simpson had to a) knock him out or b) win it out of sight and then he might have got a draw. I also liked Fwanks neutrality at the start of the fight. Shows our sport in a really good light doesn't it? 
Re: Terry O'Connor should be ashamed!
Why the eff is nothing ever done about jokers like O'Connor? Sure, the board can release a statement about how they will have a stern talk with an official, but that same official is always right back putting in shit performances in important fights.
-
mickey1975
- Heavyweight

- Posts: 23132
- Joined: 02 Mar 2009, 12:54
Re: Terry O'Connor should be ashamed!
Does Fwank have an interest in Simpson any more? I dont think he does.I was impressed Fwank had made the effort to go to be honest,he sometimes does not,even to some of his own shows.Fat Git wrote:Is anyone outraged anymore? Simpson had to a) knock him out or b) win it out of sight and then he might have got a draw. I also liked Fwanks neutrality at the start of the fight. Shows our sport in a really good light doesn't it?
Re: Terry O'Connor should be ashamed!
O'Connor should be disciplined. He is clearly not fit to judge fights. This is a serious issue and makes a mockery of hard working fighters and their efforts.
Re: Terry O'Connor should be ashamed!
McDermott v Fury I, nuff' said.
Re: Terry O'Connor should be ashamed!
i think in the light of o'connor's scorecard here and considering previous indiscretions (Fury v McDermott part 1 springs to mind) it might be time for the old chap to let someone else have a go
Re: Terry O'Connor should be ashamed!
And that is why he is regarded very highly Worldwide, IMHO he is the best UK has "For Now"King Geedorah wrote:Howard Foster's card could have been flipped either way and still been fair on both men.
-
alexpaterson
- Heavyweight

- Posts: 4310
- Joined: 22 Feb 2009, 11:22
Re: Terry O'Connor should be ashamed!
Terry O'Conner is a pathetic judge! 118-112 there is no possible way the fight was that one sided, 2 rounds to Simpson
.
Re: Terry O'Connor should be ashamed!
O'Connor's scorecard was very poor.
Re: Terry O'Connor should be ashamed!
He must have just been watching Smith and given him every close round. The fight was very close again. I imagine John Simpson feels like packing up; he's not had one close fight get called his way :(
-
Superheavy
- Cruiserweight
- Posts: 333
- Joined: 20 Feb 2011, 07:24
Re: Terry O'Connor should be ashamed!
Cheers mate - spent all day trying to avoid finding out the result so I could watch it on sky plus tonight.Camcas wrote:Enough said really always scores fights completelty wrongly and the board do nothing it is a disgrace tbh, but still the board won't do anything ahwell. I thought Simpson would by one or two rounds
-
el_grande_mauro_mina
- Lightweight
- Posts: 11215
- Joined: 24 Dec 2017, 11:54
Re: Terry O'Connor should be ashamed!
Would you really come on here a good 18 hours later if you wanted to avoid the result?Superheavy wrote:Cheers mate - spent all day trying to avoid finding out the result so I could watch it on sky plus tonight.Camcas wrote:Enough said really always scores fights completelty wrongly and the board do nothing it is a disgrace tbh, but still the board won't do anything ahwell. I thought Simpson would by one or two rounds
-
Superheavy
- Cruiserweight
- Posts: 333
- Joined: 20 Feb 2011, 07:24
Re: Terry O'Connor should be ashamed!
Yes. Normally people put "Spoilor Alert" in the title.Fat Git wrote:Would you really come on here a good 18 hours later if you wanted to avoid the result?Superheavy wrote:Cheers mate - spent all day trying to avoid finding out the result so I could watch it on sky plus tonight.Camcas wrote:Enough said really always scores fights completelty wrongly and the board do nothing it is a disgrace tbh, but still the board won't do anything ahwell. I thought Simpson would by one or two rounds
-
el_grande_mauro_mina
- Lightweight
- Posts: 11215
- Joined: 24 Dec 2017, 11:54
Re: Terry O'Connor should be ashamed!
There are a load of posts on here with the result in the title, this isn't the only one!Superheavy wrote:Yes. Normally people put "Spoilor Alert" in the title.Fat Git wrote:Would you really come on here a good 18 hours later if you wanted to avoid the result?Superheavy wrote: Cheers mate - spent all day trying to avoid finding out the result so I could watch it on sky plus tonight.
-
Superheavy
- Cruiserweight
- Posts: 333
- Joined: 20 Feb 2011, 07:24
Re: Terry O'Connor should be ashamed!
To be fair to the author of this post, you are right. I didn't look at the other titles - just saw O'Connor's name in the title of this one, remembered his bizarre performance for Fury v McD, and wondered whether he'd been up to his old tricks.Fat Git wrote:There are a load of posts on here with the result in the title, this isn't the only one!Superheavy wrote:Yes. Normally people put "Spoilor Alert" in the title.Fat Git wrote: Would you really come on here a good 18 hours later if you wanted to avoid the result?You should have gone and hid in a church like Bob and Terry did with the England vs Bulgaria game!
-
WestEndRiot
- Heavyweight

- Posts: 559
- Joined: 07 Jan 2009, 21:15
Re: Terry O'Connor should be ashamed!
This isn't a huge spoiler, it just let's you know the fight went the full 12, I'd be more concerned with the thread "simpson was robbed....again!"
Re: Terry O'Connor should be ashamed!
Does anyone on here think O'Connor has something against little frank. look at the first Fury v McD, fight and last nights fight. McD. and Simpson are both Maloney fighters.
Re: Terry O'Connor should be ashamed!
judged a fair few of my fight s and ref a few but thank god they didnt go the distance fornicate me he wants sackin this not the first time was not long back was the same 
-
steelcity 65
- Heavyweight

- Posts: 325
- Joined: 02 Jun 2009, 01:00
Re: Terry O'Connor should be ashamed!
I thought simpson edged it good fight
Re: Terry O'Connor should be ashamed!
Just watched the fight as couldn't see it last night. It's a sad state of affairs when you watch a fight knowing which way the result will go even though it was close. I thought Simpson won by 3. O'Connor is a disgrace, there is no defending that, if he had any pride (which I very much doubt) he should walk away from the sport. That card is utterly unjustifiable.
Shame for John Simpson, poor guy can't even buy a result....whereas other people clearly can (or maybe one card anyway)*
*DISCLAIMER.....so I assume....not referring to any fight in particular
Shame for John Simpson, poor guy can't even buy a result....whereas other people clearly can (or maybe one card anyway)*
*DISCLAIMER.....so I assume....not referring to any fight in particular
Re: Terry O'Connor should be ashamed!
x2dapug wrote:Does anyone on here think O'Connor has something against little frank. look at the first Fury v McD, fight and last nights fight. McD. and Simpson are both Maloney fighters.
Re: Terry O'Connor should be ashamed!
Could be right here. Apparently, John McDermott's Dad fought and stopped Terry O'Connor years ago. That might have had something to do with his ridiculous scoring that night.dapug wrote:Does anyone on here think O'Connor has something against little frank. look at the first Fury v McD, fight and last nights fight. McD. and Simpson are both Maloney fighters.
What I don't understand is, the board acted on that decision, and ordered a rematch. Why are they still letting O'Connor score fights? 118-112 is an absolute joke. It's almost as if he's thinking, "That was a close round so I can be justified in giving it to Smith", which is bollocks.