should pacquio be this good @ this stage of his career???

Post Reply
hurlock
Heavyweight
Heavyweight
Posts: 5687
Joined: 29 Mar 2009, 04:23

should pacquio be this good @ this stage of his career???

Post by hurlock »

to me it seem's unbelievable almost as the man as had a long hARD fought career & is producing his best work now??? weve seen how knackerd barrera,morales & marquez look.
the truth
Heavyweight
Heavyweight
Posts: 759
Joined: 12 Dec 2009, 11:54

Re: should pacquio be this good @ this stage of his career???

Post by the truth »

Are you saying peds?
hurlock
Heavyweight
Heavyweight
Posts: 5687
Joined: 29 Mar 2009, 04:23

Re: should pacquio be this good @ this stage of his career???

Post by hurlock »

the truth wrote:Are you saying peds?

im a fan...but ive analysed the sport for many years & fighters who aint even been to the well that many times in fights still tire through putting there body through hell to aqquire prime fitness & your body can only take so much & in theory pacquio is a very old fighter with plenty of miles.
whiskey
Heavyweight
Heavyweight
Posts: 11956
Joined: 27 Mar 2007, 14:52

Re: should pacquio be this good @ this stage of his career???

Post by whiskey »

Vitamin S
Monte Fisto
Cruiserweight
Posts: 2978
Joined: 23 Jan 2011, 15:36

Re: should pacquio be this good @ this stage of his career???

Post by Monte Fisto »

GENETICS :) ;)
flatnoseflynn
Heavyweight
Heavyweight
Posts: 319
Joined: 14 Sep 2009, 16:42

Re: should pacquio be this good @ this stage of his career???

Post by flatnoseflynn »

By boxing washed up fighters............ maybe ;;-) ;;-)
exittored
Heavyweight
Heavyweight
Posts: 1565
Joined: 19 Apr 2008, 19:40

Re: should pacquio be this good @ this stage of his career???

Post by exittored »

hurlock wrote:to me it seem's unbelievable almost as the man as had a long hARD fought career & is producing his best work now??? weve seen how knackerd barrera,morales & marquez look.
Pacman is only 32 and probably has another year or two before you'll start seeing him slide. Recent fighters like Calzaghe, Lennox lewis, Bhops, Juan manuel Marquez, Sergio Martinez and the Klitschko brothers were/are older then him and produced some of their best performances after 32. The common theme to a lot of them is that they seem to take care of themselves outside of the ring and live the lives of athletes staying out of the spotlight.

Alot of the fighters in the past who had great careers in their 20's and looked terrible in the 30's also had a history of drug, alcohol, gaining huge weight jumps between fights, jail and maritol problems that all combined to end their careers early.

Pacman is probably one of the best conditioned athletes in the world plus will have access to the very best legal nutrients and supplements around and no that dosen't mean he's taking peds, infact if you know how to get the best from these the results can still be great.
wesley05
Heavyweight
Heavyweight

Re: should pacquio be this good @ this stage of his career???

Post by wesley05 »

exittored wrote:
hurlock wrote:to me it seem's unbelievable almost as the man as had a long hARD fought career & is producing his best work now??? weve seen how knackerd barrera,morales & marquez look.
Pacman is only 32 and probably has another year or two before you'll start seeing him slide. Recent fighters like Calzaghe, Lennox lewis, Bhops, Juan manuel Marquez, Sergio Martinez and the Klitschko brothers were/are older then him and produced some of their best performances after 32. The common theme to a lot of them is that they seem to take care of themselves outside of the ring and live the lives of athletes staying out of the spotlight.

Alot of the fighters in the past who had great careers in their 20's and looked terrible in the 30's also had a history of drug, alcohol, gaining huge weight jumps between fights, jail and maritol problems that all combined to end their careers early.

Pacman is probably one of the best conditioned athletes in the world plus will have access to the very best legal nutrients and supplements around and no that dosen't mean he's taking peds, infact if you know how to get the best from these the results can still be great.
U a doctor :DD
Loynesy
Heavyweight
Heavyweight
Posts: 1767
Joined: 26 Sep 2003, 08:29

Re: should pacquio be this good @ this stage of his career???

Post by Loynesy »

Exit - you pretty much nailed it with that post.
Asterix
Heavyweight
Heavyweight
Posts: 7128
Joined: 02 Nov 2007, 10:42

Re: should pacquio be this good @ this stage of his career???

Post by Asterix »

Juan Manuel Marquez is something like 5 years older and he's still kicking arse. :box:
REAL_DEAL
Heavyweight
Heavyweight
Posts: 5030
Joined: 09 Jul 2003, 06:42

Re: should pacquio be this good @ this stage of his career???

Post by REAL_DEAL »

thats cause he drinks his own piss.
Newport Daz
Cruiserweight
Posts: 687
Joined: 31 Aug 2010, 07:26

Re: should pacquio be this good @ this stage of his career???

Post by Newport Daz »

On ESB the writers are asking why Pac looked so bad and whether age/wars are catching up with him. Looks like people are having very different opinions on Pac's performance.
whiskey
Heavyweight
Heavyweight
Posts: 11956
Joined: 27 Mar 2007, 14:52

Re: should pacquio be this good @ this stage of his career???

Post by whiskey »

Shane threw almost half the same amount of punches during the Pac fight as opposed to the Mayweather fight.

Yet even as lame as his effort was, he landed 82 shots as opposed to 94 on Floyd... with just half the output.

I think he touched gloves more often than he landed power shots.
crusader
Heavyweight
Heavyweight
Posts: 16875
Joined: 19 Jan 2009, 20:14

Re: should pacquio be this good @ this stage of his career???

Post by crusader »

Mosley landed 20% of his total punches aganst both Pac/PBF and when you bifurcate total punches into power shots and jabs he landed at nearly the same percentage against both guys.

http://www.BS.com/forums/view. ... y-compubox

http://www.BS.com/forums/view. ... y-compubox
Final round
Cruiserweight
Posts: 4911
Joined: 20 Oct 2010, 17:02

Re: should pacquio be this good @ this stage of his career???

Post by Final round »

G0mez wrote:Shane threw almost half the same amount of punches during the Pac fight as opposed to the Mayweather fight.

Yet even as lame as his effort was, he landed 82 shots as opposed to 94 on Floyd... with just half the output.

I think he touched gloves more often than he landed power shots.
Far too much touching of gloves by Mosley it's like he kept trying to remind Pacquaio that he was a real nice guy really, 'please don't knock me out!'
grannyman
Cruiserweight
Posts: 183
Joined: 09 Feb 2011, 11:36

Re: should pacquio be this good @ this stage of his career???

Post by grannyman »

I love watching Pac-man, but I do get fed up listening to the crowd "OOOOHH and AAAHHHH" over three shot combo's that miss by half a foot. He's amazing but I think you need see something wicked before you cream your pants.
Final round
Cruiserweight
Posts: 4911
Joined: 20 Oct 2010, 17:02

Re: should pacquio be this good @ this stage of his career???

Post by Final round »

crusader wrote:Mosley landed 20% of his total punches aganst both Pac/PBF and when you bifurcate total punches into power shots and jabs he landed at nearly the same percentage against both guys.

http://www.BS.com/forums/view. ... y-compubox

http://www.BS.com/forums/view. ... y-compubox
Very similair performances,. terrible really.

Fight to win or go out on your back otherwise why bother unless your a journeyman who needs the money Mosley doesn't.
Shirow
Heavyweight
Heavyweight
Posts: 1718
Joined: 29 Nov 2003, 11:15

Re: should pacquio be this good @ this stage of his career???

Post by Shirow »

I think the fact that Pacquaio no longer weight drains has extended his ability to perform at this level. He said his legs were tight and that seemed to be the case, his legs looked lifeless compared to normal. Maybe it's age maybe not.

As has been said That Marquez can compete at the highest level at his age after a long career over his natural weight is even more impressive.
Post Reply