Sorry F rank, Kell is COMPLETELY comfortable at welterweight
Re: Sorry F rank, Kell is COMPLETELY comfortable at welterweight
Completely agree with goldenears on this one.
It's all about opinions though.
It's all about opinions though.
Re: Sorry F rank, Kell is COMPLETELY comfortable at welterweight
Hi Ian,Ian 'Mr' McNeilly wrote:Completely agree with goldenears on this one.
It's all about opinions though.
How many people do you think used to watch Hamed in the hope that he would get "badly knocked out"?
Just for the record, i said "I would hate to see anyone hurt" that would be horrible, BUT I LOVE BRUTAL Ko's,(and I bet most on here do also)
I guess I must be nmore of the Michale Moorer type in that I love brutal horror movies and brutal ko's, of course one is acting and the other is real life but as long as no one gets hurts then its GREAT!
C'mon Ian, I love the artistic part of the game (countering and the like) but watching a fight without a great knockout is like turning a porno off before the money shot.
Re: Sorry F rank, Kell is COMPLETELY comfortable at welterweight
No I dont, please read my intial post carefully, I said "I hope I'm wrong"Ian 'Mr' McNeilly wrote:Jon Saxon wrote:BRUTAL ko coming once he really steps up.
Do you accept that your repeated use of the word 'brutal' (and now capitalisation for emphasis of it) gives the impression that you are really looking forward to him being badly knocked out?
I would of course prefer the British fighter to do well at all times and hope that NO fighter EVER gets hurt.
-
Final round
- Cruiserweight
- Posts: 4911
- Joined: 20 Oct 2010, 17:02
Re: Sorry F rank, Kell is COMPLETELY comfortable at welterweight
Fair enough mate, I agree on the quality aspect of a fight is the most important although Haye attacking Audley was a thankful respite to the boredom of the first two rounds!goldenears wrote:yep agreed. a spectacular KO is a special achievement, but there was something equally worrying as thrilling about the way, say, Pac floored Ricky H. I was there and whilst it was incredible for the next few minutes most people around were genuinely worried, but that was a one punch KO, like Martinez' against Williams - those things are incredible technically too, but watching what i would call a 'brutal' KO isn't what I pay my money for - i'd rather see 12 rounds of quality than someone just sparking someone else. Khan v Maidana was spectacular without anyone getting brutally KO'd - people get hurt in boxing, stunned, knocked over and when you see 2 fighters swimming in deep waters, refusing to lose, those are the most thrilling fights, not Khan getting flattened by Prescott haymakers after 30 seconds or Haye smashing Audley to pieces.Final round wrote:Kessler v Froch was brutal! but I see where you're coming from you don't want to see someone get beatdown continually round after round with no comeback but to most boxers a KO is like scoring goal of the year and it's a real achievement to get one at the higher end of the sport.goldenears wrote: i dont think that you're turning into an old woman. Boxing fans don't like to see fighters get badly hurt. As game as Sam Webb was, for instance, i thought they should have stopped that fight 3 rounds early as the result was not in doubt at that point.
I'm happier to see great displays of technical boxing mixed with fighters heart , like, say the Froch vs Kessler fight.
If you like sheer brutality go and watch UFC. Not interested in that personally.
Re: Sorry F rank, Kell is COMPLETELY comfortable at welterweight
I think you're losing it, Jon...you've already answered this question with a yes! Now it's a no!Jon Saxon wrote:No I dont, please read my intial post carefully, I said "I hope I'm wrong"Ian 'Mr' McNeilly wrote:Jon Saxon wrote:BRUTAL ko coming once he really steps up.
Do you accept that your repeated use of the word 'brutal' (and now capitalisation for emphasis of it) gives the impression that you are really looking forward to him being badly knocked out?
I would of course prefer the British fighter to do well at all times and hope that NO fighter EVER gets hurt.
Anyway, I read your post carefully which is why I phrased my question as 'gives the impression'...
Re: Sorry F rank, Kell is COMPLETELY comfortable at welterweight
Jon Saxon wrote:
Do you accept that your repeated use of the word 'brutal' (and now capitalisation for emphasis of it) gives the impression that you are really looking forward to him being badly knocked out?
Hi Ian,
Can I ask you this before I answer.
How many people do you think used to watch Hamed in the hope that he would get badly knocked out?
I feel that Brook has no real substance and will be on the end of a harsh dose of reality once he steps up to the higher echelons.
Now back to my motivation, well to answer you directly yes in all truth I really love watching "brutal" Ko's, for example I particularly like Tim Witherspoon Vs Anders Eckland, and obviously Jackson v Graham.
I can see an Amir Khan v Prescot brutal KO coming the way of Brook.
Anyway WHO doesn't like watching "brutal" ko's? I mean don't we all love the beautiful violence that boxing gives us?
I never want to see any fighter hurt EVER in this sport but I LOVE watching someone getting KTFO, there's nothing better!
Don't you like seeing the likes of David Haye sparking someone Ian?[/quote]
Are you a politician, Jon?
Actually, I don't like seeing brutal KOs. Don't know if it's because I'm getting older or what. When Craig Watson got up on automatic pilot after being cracked by Lee Purdy, and obviously had no clue as to where he was, I was a bit uncomfortable. Think I'm turning into an old woman.[/quote]
lol thats odd i thought I said yes![/quote]
Here's a reminder, above...
As for Naz, fully agree, loads of people watched him hoping he'd get iced...same as they did with Ali.
Re: Sorry F rank, Kell is COMPLETELY comfortable at welterweight
Are you a politician, Jon?Ian 'Mr' McNeilly wrote:Jon Saxon wrote:
Do you accept that your repeated use of the word 'brutal' (and now capitalisation for emphasis of it) gives the impression that you are really looking forward to him being badly knocked out?
Hi Ian,
Can I ask you this before I answer.
How many people do you think used to watch Hamed in the hope that he would get badly knocked out?
I feel that Brook has no real substance and will be on the end of a harsh dose of reality once he steps up to the higher echelons.
Now back to my motivation, well to answer you directly yes in all truth I really love watching "brutal" Ko's, for example I particularly like Tim Witherspoon Vs Anders Eckland, and obviously Jackson v Graham.
I can see an Amir Khan v Prescot brutal KO coming the way of Brook.
Anyway WHO doesn't like watching "brutal" ko's? I mean don't we all love the beautiful violence that boxing gives us?
I never want to see any fighter hurt EVER in this sport but I LOVE watching someone getting KTFO, there's nothing better!
Don't you like seeing the likes of David Haye sparking someone Ian?
Actually, I don't like seeing brutal KOs. Don't know if it's because I'm getting older or what. When Craig Watson got up on automatic pilot after being cracked by Lee Purdy, and obviously had no clue as to where he was, I was a bit uncomfortable. Think I'm turning into an old woman.[/quote]
lol thats odd i thought I said yes![/quote]
Here's a reminder, above...
As for Naz, fully agree, loads of people watched him hoping he'd get iced...same as they did with Ali.[/quote]
No Ian, it is you who are wrong, by stating "badly knocked out" there is a direct implication that I wanted to see Brook hurt. I love great ko's but not "bad" ko's.
For example I didn't like the Mercer ko of Morrison, that to me is a bad ko.
So you are wrong.
Re: Sorry F rank, Kell is COMPLETELY comfortable at welterweight
You're getting out of your weight class here, Jon.Jon Saxon wrote:
No Ian, it is you who are wrong, by stating "badly knocked out" there is a direct implication that I wanted to see Brook hurt. I love great ko's but not "bad" ko's.
For example I didn't like the Mercer ko of Morrison, that to me is a bad ko.
So you are wrong.
First you answered yes, then you forgot you had answered and said no to the same question.
I initially asked if you accepted that your words 'gave the impression' - and you agree, above...and then you tell me I'm wrong after agreeing with me.
-
Final round
- Cruiserweight
- Posts: 4911
- Joined: 20 Oct 2010, 17:02
Re: Sorry F rank, Kell is COMPLETELY comfortable at welterweight
Don't blame you mate. You're not the only one. I'm not but, you know...Final round wrote:I'm confused.
-
Final round
- Cruiserweight
- Posts: 4911
- Joined: 20 Oct 2010, 17:02
-
Rocky Balboa
- Heavyweight

- Posts: 1851
- Joined: 24 Jan 2004, 16:38
Re: Sorry F rank, Kell is COMPLETELY comfortable at welterweight
BANG ON!Pugilist-specialist wrote:It's nice to see that allegedly is consistent when speaking about fighters that have left him.
It's a pity that Terence didn't ask him about Calzaghe's money.
And its a Pity he wasn't asked about the time when he went head-to-head with a Mr Donald King!