WHO ELSE WILL REFUSE TO BUY DEGALE v GROVES AS PPV?

danfoster
Heavyweight
Heavyweight
Posts: 651
Joined: 02 Feb 2009, 05:07

WHO ELSE WILL REFUSE TO BUY DEGALE v GROVES AS PPV?

Post by danfoster »

I was so looking forward to this card but i aint shelling out for £15 for a british title fight, sorry. It is a point of principle.

PPV is for special events, the creme de la creme.

anyone else changing their plans for Sat night now?
Gazmac81
Heavyweight
Heavyweight
Posts: 2103
Joined: 04 Oct 2008, 10:06

Re: WHO ELSE WILL REFUSE TO BUY DEGALE v GROVES AS PPV?

Post by Gazmac81 »

i think theres alot of intrest in this so will prob still sell

ill be watching on stream due to fact my cable is off the now but no doubt at last minute alot of people will buy.

if a pubs showing though best going there and using your 15 bucks for a few pints
earsjohn
Heavyweight
Heavyweight
Posts: 1691
Joined: 02 Sep 2006, 14:34

Re: WHO ELSE WILL REFUSE TO BUY DEGALE v GROVES AS PPV?

Post by earsjohn »

Not for £15 with the undercard as it stands, I won't. Maybe if Sky reduce to around £8 i'd be interested, but £15 is too steep in these straightened times for about 10 minutes entertainment.
big lennox
Heavyweight
Heavyweight
Posts: 2550
Joined: 06 Feb 2004, 13:44

Re: WHO ELSE WILL REFUSE TO BUY DEGALE v GROVES AS PPV?

Post by big lennox »

I was planning on going, but I don't think I can justify the £50 for it now.What a shame.
bad mamma jamma
Heavyweight
Heavyweight
Posts: 347
Joined: 15 Jun 2009, 05:31

Re: WHO ELSE WILL REFUSE TO BUY DEGALE v GROVES AS PPV?

Post by bad mamma jamma »

not worth it..dangerous if it sells cos any other fight where both boxers have pulses will be on ppv in future
SteveDow
Heavyweight
Heavyweight
Posts: 1800
Joined: 25 Aug 2009, 20:05

Re: WHO ELSE WILL REFUSE TO BUY DEGALE v GROVES AS PPV?

Post by SteveDow »

Was contemplating seriously buying tickets yesterday but not now and will also watch on a steam or go to a pub. I spend a fortune every year attending shows and buying PPV's but having this as PPV takes the mick without one of the two main events so stream or pub for me.
alexpaterson
Heavyweight
Heavyweight
Posts: 4310
Joined: 22 Feb 2009, 11:22

Re: WHO ELSE WILL REFUSE TO BUY DEGALE v GROVES AS PPV?

Post by alexpaterson »

I'll definetly be buying! I'm a sucker for hype and I'm really buzzing for this fight. I can see another fight being upgraded to try and sell better perhaps
freddydoesdallas
Cruiserweight
Posts: 9436
Joined: 02 Sep 2010, 13:48

Re: WHO ELSE WILL REFUSE TO BUY DEGALE v GROVES AS PPV?

Post by freddydoesdallas »

I think i'll still buy this. Went to a local show recently with a couple of mates who weren't into boxing recently and they loved it so said i'd get this card in and have a few beers. Don't want them to go off it already!
watson748
Heavyweight
Heavyweight
Posts: 84
Joined: 25 Feb 2009, 14:21

Re: WHO ELSE WILL REFUSE TO BUY DEGALE v GROVES AS PPV?

Post by watson748 »

earsjohn wrote:Not for £15 with the undercard as it stands, I won't. Maybe if Sky reduce to around £8 i'd be interested, but £15 is too steep in these straightened times for about 10 minutes entertainment.
+1

Even reducing it to a fiver would show that Sky are not using double standards regarding the Khan PPV fight.

I mean Sky try desperately to give away £100,000.00 every week in their Super Six Football competition (which is free to enter) and yet they still screw boxing fans for even the slightest bit of home grown entertainment. :witzend:

I only refuse to buy Sky's PPV if they are joke fights like the Haye vs Harrison one or the Khan one. I bought Franks Magnificent 5.5 (or whatever it eventually turned out be) and thoroughly enjoyed it because all the fights were competitive. And I would have bought this one because although its not a top class world title fight it still was a world title fight and all the other fights (again) seemed to be very competitive. Now that Cleverlys fight is off, its taken the only major title away and this isn't a £15.00 PPV anymore plain and simple.

Perhaps they should just make all promotions like the Magnificent 7 and then if some fights fall through there are enough good quality ones to carry the show. That show was one of the best PPV's in recent boxing. :bow:
Final round
Cruiserweight
Posts: 4911
Joined: 20 Oct 2010, 17:02

Re: WHO ELSE WILL REFUSE TO BUY DEGALE v GROVES AS PPV?

Post by Final round »

I was going to buy it but not now, DeGale Groves will be good but not that good.
Tommy Gunn13
Heavyweight
Heavyweight
Posts: 3290
Joined: 10 Nov 2008, 13:11

Re: WHO ELSE WILL REFUSE TO BUY DEGALE v GROVES AS PPV?

Post by Tommy Gunn13 »

I wasnt buying it anyhow,id have gone down my local to watch it&spent more out of principal...Feel sorry to the many people who brought tickets,you have Groves-Degale&many one sided mismatches...its bollox if its kept as PPV
Andypittcov
Heavyweight
Heavyweight

Re: WHO ELSE WILL REFUSE TO BUY DEGALE v GROVES AS PPV?

Post by Andypittcov »

I'll be buying because I won't be able to resist, I'd agree with it not being value for money but I'll keep things in perspective, it's only £15 for a nights entertainment, taking the missus to the cinema costs more.
Eff me I've got mates who say I ain't paying £15 for that, then they go out spend £150 on a night out on the piss its quite ridiculous really.
Jeff Thomas
Heavyweight
Heavyweight
Posts: 3016
Joined: 30 Apr 2009, 06:32

Re: WHO ELSE WILL REFUSE TO BUY DEGALE v GROVES AS PPV?

Post by Jeff Thomas »

No chance, no disrespect to either fighter but zero possibility now
whiskey
Heavyweight
Heavyweight
Posts: 11956
Joined: 27 Mar 2007, 14:52

Re: WHO ELSE WILL REFUSE TO BUY DEGALE v GROVES AS PPV?

Post by whiskey »

I'd like to scream and shout about how I won't buy it.

But the truth is I will as always.

Besides i've got a new B&W subwoofer to put through it's paces on my home cinema system in glorious HD, hopefully it will capture the moment that Degale hits the deck with a huge THUD.

Or maybe not :D
earsjohn
Heavyweight
Heavyweight
Posts: 1691
Joined: 02 Sep 2006, 14:34

Re: WHO ELSE WILL REFUSE TO BUY DEGALE v GROVES AS PPV?

Post by earsjohn »

Andypittcov wrote:I'll be buying because I won't be able to resist, I'd agree with it not being value for money but I'll keep things in perspective, it's only £15 for a nights entertainment, taking the missus to the cinema costs more.
Eff me I've got mates who say I ain't paying £15 for that, then they go out spend £150 on a night out on the piss its quite ridiculous really.
But the comparison in this case is that you head off to the cinema happy to spend your £15 on Pirates of the Caribbean 4 only to be told that the tape is fcuked so you have to watch Marley & Me instead, with no chance of a refund.

(You'll have to adjust the films to suit your own taste, apologies if you would happily stump up £15 for a film about Rachel from Friends and a dog.)
smcb80
Cruiserweight
Posts: 195
Joined: 18 May 2011, 08:27

Re: WHO ELSE WILL REFUSE TO BUY DEGALE v GROVES AS PPV?

Post by smcb80 »

can't find anything on the ppv on sky's site. no way will they charge £15 for this
Andypittcov
Heavyweight
Heavyweight

Re: WHO ELSE WILL REFUSE TO BUY DEGALE v GROVES AS PPV?

Post by Andypittcov »

earsjohn wrote:
Andypittcov wrote:I'll be buying because I won't be able to resist, I'd agree with it not being value for money but I'll keep things in perspective, it's only £15 for a nights entertainment, taking the missus to the cinema costs more.
Eff me I've got mates who say I ain't paying £15 for that, then they go out spend £150 on a night out on the piss its quite ridiculous really.
But the comparison in this case is that you head off to the cinema happy to spend your £15 on Pirates of the Caribbean 4 only to be told that the tape is fcuked so you have to watch Marley & Me instead, with no chance of a refund.

(You'll have to adjust the films to suit your own taste, apologies if you would happily stump up £15 for a film about Rachel from Friends and a dog.)
:shame: Marley and me is better than pirates of the carribean.
freddydoesdallas
Cruiserweight
Posts: 9436
Joined: 02 Sep 2010, 13:48

Re: WHO ELSE WILL REFUSE TO BUY DEGALE v GROVES AS PPV?

Post by freddydoesdallas »

earsjohn wrote:
Andypittcov wrote:I'll be buying because I won't be able to resist, I'd agree with it not being value for money but I'll keep things in perspective, it's only £15 for a nights entertainment, taking the missus to the cinema costs more.
Eff me I've got mates who say I ain't paying £15 for that, then they go out spend £150 on a night out on the piss its quite ridiculous really.
But the comparison in this case is that you head off to the cinema happy to spend your £15 on Pirates of the Caribbean 4 only to be told that the tape is fcuked so you have to watch Marley & Me instead, with no chance of a refund.

(You'll have to adjust the films to suit your own taste, apologies if you would happily stump up £15 for a film about Rachel from Friends and a dog.)
Either way, the missus is happy and you get rewards later on in the night :box:
freddydoesdallas
Cruiserweight
Posts: 9436
Joined: 02 Sep 2010, 13:48

Re: WHO ELSE WILL REFUSE TO BUY DEGALE v GROVES AS PPV?

Post by freddydoesdallas »

BIGMARK wrote:If Sky dropped the price to say 6.99 maybe i would still buy it but not 15 quid. I wonder what Sky are thinking of doing?
As many others have mentioned before, a sliding pricing scale for boxing would be good. I'd buy a lot more if they varied it up a bit. Saturday nights fight costing the same as Haye v Wlad is a bit daft
Tommy Gunn13
Heavyweight
Heavyweight
Posts: 3290
Joined: 10 Nov 2008, 13:11

Re: WHO ELSE WILL REFUSE TO BUY DEGALE v GROVES AS PPV?

Post by Tommy Gunn13 »

Andypittcov wrote:I'll be buying because I won't be able to resist, I'd agree with it not being value for money but I'll keep things in perspective, it's only £15 for a nights entertainment, taking the missus to the cinema costs more.
Eff me I've got mates who say I ain't paying £15 for that, then they go out spend £150 on a night out on the piss its quite ridiculous really.
It called out of Principal many wont buy it...No disrespect to you,but its people like you who buy these PPV which arent worthy why they keep on selling them on PPV....
earsjohn
Heavyweight
Heavyweight
Posts: 1691
Joined: 02 Sep 2006, 14:34

Re: WHO ELSE WILL REFUSE TO BUY DEGALE v GROVES AS PPV?

Post by earsjohn »

freddydoesdallas wrote:
earsjohn wrote:
Andypittcov wrote:I'll be buying because I won't be able to resist, I'd agree with it not being value for money but I'll keep things in perspective, it's only £15 for a nights entertainment, taking the missus to the cinema costs more.
Eff me I've got mates who say I ain't paying £15 for that, then they go out spend £150 on a night out on the piss its quite ridiculous really.
But the comparison in this case is that you head off to the cinema happy to spend your £15 on Pirates of the Caribbean 4 only to be told that the tape is fcuked so you have to watch Marley & Me instead, with no chance of a refund.

(You'll have to adjust the films to suit your own taste, apologies if you would happily stump up £15 for a film about Rachel from Friends and a dog.)
Either way, the missus is happy and you get rewards later on in the night :box:
...or she spends the night grizzling about a dead mutt and any attempts at intimacy leave you confined to the dog house....
Andypittcov
Heavyweight
Heavyweight

Re: WHO ELSE WILL REFUSE TO BUY DEGALE v GROVES AS PPV?

Post by Andypittcov »

Tommy Gunn13 wrote:
Andypittcov wrote:I'll be buying because I won't be able to resist, I'd agree with it not being value for money but I'll keep things in perspective, it's only £15 for a nights entertainment, taking the missus to the cinema costs more.
Eff me I've got mates who say I ain't paying £15 for that, then they go out spend £150 on a night out on the piss its quite ridiculous really.
It called out of Principal many wont buy it...No disrespect to you,but its people like you who buy these PPV which arent worthy why they keep on selling them on PPV....
If you don't mind me asking tommy, what principle are you talking about?
Tommy Gunn13
Heavyweight
Heavyweight
Posts: 3290
Joined: 10 Nov 2008, 13:11

Re: WHO ELSE WILL REFUSE TO BUY DEGALE v GROVES AS PPV?

Post by Tommy Gunn13 »

Andypittcov wrote:
Tommy Gunn13 wrote:
Andypittcov wrote:I'll be buying because I won't be able to resist, I'd agree with it not being value for money but I'll keep things in perspective, it's only £15 for a nights entertainment, taking the missus to the cinema costs more.
Eff me I've got mates who say I ain't paying £15 for that, then they go out spend £150 on a night out on the piss its quite ridiculous really.
It called out of Principal many wont buy it...No disrespect to you,but its people like you who buy these PPV which arent worthy why they keep on selling them on PPV....
If you don't mind me asking tommy, what principle are you talking about?
My spelling :roll: Id rather pay more going down the pub for the fight than buy it from sky out of PRINCIPLE :bow:
Andypittcov
Heavyweight
Heavyweight

Re: WHO ELSE WILL REFUSE TO BUY DEGALE v GROVES AS PPV?

Post by Andypittcov »

Tommy Gunn13 wrote:
Andypittcov wrote:
Tommy Gunn13 wrote: It called out of Principal many wont buy it...No disrespect to you,but its people like you who buy these PPV which arent worthy why they keep on selling them on PPV....
If you don't mind me asking tommy, what principle are you talking about?
My spelling :roll: Id rather pay more going down the pub for the fight than buy it from sky out of PRINCIPLE :bow:
Yeah what principle? I would imagine your principle is not to pay for something that isn't worth the money? In that case why pay £3 for a shit pint of lager of worse £2.50 for a soft drink.
Tommy Gunn13
Heavyweight
Heavyweight
Posts: 3290
Joined: 10 Nov 2008, 13:11

Re: WHO ELSE WILL REFUSE TO BUY DEGALE v GROVES AS PPV?

Post by Tommy Gunn13 »

Andypittcov wrote:
Tommy Gunn13 wrote:
Andypittcov wrote: If you don't mind me asking tommy, what principle are you talking about?
My spelling :roll: Id rather pay more going down the pub for the fight than buy it from sky out of PRINCIPLE :bow:
Yeah what principle? I would imagine your principle is not to pay for something that isn't worth the money? In that case why pay £3 for a shit pint of lager of worse £2.50 for a soft drink.
yes id rather put £15 in my landlords pocket than in skys....only interested in the main fight,nothing else worth watching,unless Cleverley gets a live one which i doubt he will anyhow....you keep filling skys pockets even more!! bet u pay to watch that wrestling shite aswell :lol:
Post Reply