World Level Fighters

Post Reply
JAHamilton77
Heavyweight
Heavyweight
Posts: 613
Joined: 06 Mar 2006, 13:14

World Level Fighters

Post by JAHamilton77 »

I have heard a lot of the British posters refer to fighters as national level and European level fighters. I am not too concerned with these levels. Beyond that there is world level/world class type fighters, I am curious to see what British fighters are considered to be World Level.

I mean obviously Khan, Froch, and Haye qualify. After these three obvious ones, is there anyone else considered to be a world class fighter?
Shambles
Cruiserweight
Posts: 458
Joined: 06 Feb 2011, 15:20

Re: World Level Fighters

Post by Shambles »

JAHamilton77 wrote:I have heard a lot of the British posters refer to fighters as national level and European level fighters. I am not too concerned with these levels. Beyond that there is world level/world class type fighters, I am curious to see what British fighters are considered to be World Level.

I mean obviously Khan, Froch, and Haye qualify. After these three obvious ones, is there anyone else considered to be a world class fighter?

Burns maybe?
whicker
Heavyweight
Heavyweight
Posts: 4550
Joined: 01 Jan 2008, 01:52

Re: World Level Fighters

Post by whicker »

At the moment, it's so hard to say, seeing as British fighters are match very much below world level. EG the guy Cleverley is fighting, looks to be a fringe European/Eu level challenger at best.

Until a British fighter takes on a beats a bona fide world level opponent, it's hard to say.
Hounddawg
Heavyweight
Heavyweight
Posts: 4035
Joined: 26 Feb 2008, 07:50

Re: World Level Fighters

Post by Hounddawg »

It's early but Cleverly and Barker look decent.
Tommy Gunn13
Heavyweight
Heavyweight
Posts: 3290
Joined: 10 Nov 2008, 13:11

Re: World Level Fighters

Post by Tommy Gunn13 »

Obvisly Haye,Khan&Froch... Burns is a world champ but i dont think hes world level(martinez win flatterd him he wouldnt beat him again) Cleverly looks class but i think he will fall short against Pascal,Cloud&Dawson.... I like Barker but like Cleverly he would fail to hang wiv the top guns.. Then Degale,Price&Gavin there the three who Could be are next world champs after those already mentioned...Degale has that something about him that i dont like&Naz had that(then i got to like Naseem)class i think....Big Pricey could be coming thru at the right time&would beat all are boys bar Haye right now&could come on to the world stage at the right time....Then with Frankie Gavin maybe we have the best of the bunch with him,Just worried his power will let him down at top level,but that didnt stop Pernell Whitaker(who frankie said is his fav boxer) Frankie Gavin could be the british Whitaker :TU:
tear up
Cruiserweight
Posts: 1832
Joined: 06 Dec 2010, 12:25

Re: World Level Fighters

Post by tear up »

jonlcfc1 wrote:
JAHamilton77 wrote:I have heard a lot of the British posters refer to fighters as national level and European level fighters. I am not too concerned with these levels. Beyond that there is world level/world class type fighters, I am curious to see what British fighters are considered to be World Level.

I mean obviously Khan, Froch, and Haye qualify. After these three obvious ones, is there anyone else considered to be a world class fighter?

Burns maybe?
he world champ and took it from a world class champ how he not world class come on now :witzend:
JC
Heavyweight
Heavyweight
Posts: 4578
Joined: 07 Jan 2004, 13:04

Re: World Level Fighters

Post by JC »

JAHamilton77 wrote:I have heard a lot of the British posters refer to fighters as national level and European level fighters. I am not too concerned with these levels. Beyond that there is world level/world class type fighters, I am curious to see what British fighters are considered to be World Level.

I mean obviously Khan, Froch, and Haye qualify. After these three obvious ones, is there anyone else considered to be a world class fighter?
I think some of it is semantics.

There are obviously the world champs who have to be world class. Being at 'European level' can mean being at the stage of competing for a European title. But winning the EBU title often leads directly to a title shot. Fighters like Rhodes, Macklin and McClosky would probably just be considered world level contenders in the US but in Europe the presence of the EBU title complicates the picture.
whicker
Heavyweight
Heavyweight
Posts: 4550
Joined: 01 Jan 2008, 01:52

Re: World Level Fighters

Post by whicker »

Tommy Gunn13 wrote:Obvisly Haye,Khan&Froch... Burns is a world champ but i dont think hes world level(martinez win flatterd him he wouldnt beat him again) Cleverly looks class but i think he will fall short against Pascal,Cloud&Dawson.... I like Barker but like Cleverly he would fail to hang wiv the top guns.. Then Degale,Price&Gavin there the three who Could be are next world champs after those already mentioned...Degale has that something about him that i dont like&Naz had that(then i got to like Naseem)class i think....Big Pricey could be coming thru at the right time&would beat all are boys bar Haye right now&could come on to the world stage at the right time....Then with Frankie Gavin maybe we have the best of the bunch with him,Just worried his power will let him down at top level,but that didnt stop Pernell Whitaker(who frankie said is his fav boxer) Frankie Gavin could be the british Whitaker :TU:

The thing with Price is he really hasn't fought anyone of note yet. He got a bronze at the Olympics, and but after 10 pro fights we could do with seeing him now against a well know opponent- someone who would really test him.

Sprott? Skelton? Someone like that? But then people might start saying "Oh, it's far too early... " but why? If he is world class, he will need to be able to comfortably stop guys like these.
Shambles
Cruiserweight
Posts: 458
Joined: 06 Feb 2011, 15:20

Re: World Level Fighters

Post by Shambles »

tear up wrote:
jonlcfc1 wrote:
JAHamilton77 wrote:I have heard a lot of the British posters refer to fighters as national level and European level fighters. I am not too concerned with these levels. Beyond that there is world level/world class type fighters, I am curious to see what British fighters are considered to be World Level.

I mean obviously Khan, Froch, and Haye qualify. After these three obvious ones, is there anyone else considered to be a world class fighter?

Burns maybe?
he world champ and took it from a world class champ how he not world class come on now :witzend:
What??
Datsue
Heavyweight
Heavyweight

Re: World Level Fighters

Post by Datsue »

tear up wrote:
jonlcfc1 wrote:
JAHamilton77 wrote:I have heard a lot of the British posters refer to fighters as national level and European level fighters. I am not too concerned with these levels. Beyond that there is world level/world class type fighters, I am curious to see what British fighters are considered to be World Level.

I mean obviously Khan, Froch, and Haye qualify. After these three obvious ones, is there anyone else considered to be a world class fighter?

Burns maybe?
he world champ and took it from a world class champ how he not world class come on now :witzend:

Get what you're saying mate but he's a bloke with one "world class" win, over a bloke who was world class because... Because he knocked out Nicky Cook. & since then Burnsy hasn't exactly been falling over himself to bring over a succession of tough Mexicans, Thais & South American former champions to cement his status as world class, has he? It's more the old-skool WBO route of "I've beaten a fringe-ish contender for a title, from now on you shall act as if I beat Alexis Arguello & Juan Manuel Marquez on the same night whilst I fight a succession of unheard of Africans".

I think that's why people are willing to put question marks against Burnsy. After all, Kev Mitchell beat Prescott, didn't he? But we saw what happened when the bar was raised again...
damianhucker1
Heavyweight
Heavyweight
Posts: 3071
Joined: 20 Sep 2008, 17:36

Re: World Level Fighters

Post by damianhucker1 »

Kell Brook ? depends on how he would do against the top guys , impossible to say but i think hes world level but not Elite level .
whicker
Heavyweight
Heavyweight
Posts: 4550
Joined: 01 Jan 2008, 01:52

Re: World Level Fighters

Post by whicker »

damianhucker1 wrote:Kell Brook ? depends on how he would do against the top guys , impossible to say but i think hes world level but not Elite level .
Yeah- he does look to have real potential.

Along the same lines, lets not forget Ryan Rhodes- he has a world title shot coming up. He was ood against Moore- if he can come through and win the World title, he must be up there.
ShadrachSimmo
Cruiserweight
Posts: 4738
Joined: 20 Oct 2010, 05:42

Re: World Level Fighters

Post by ShadrachSimmo »

J-C wrote:
JAHamilton77 wrote:I have heard a lot of the British posters refer to fighters as national level and European level fighters. I am not too concerned with these levels. Beyond that there is world level/world class type fighters, I am curious to see what British fighters are considered to be World Level.

I mean obviously Khan, Froch, and Haye qualify. After these three obvious ones, is there anyone else considered to be a world class fighter?
I think some of it is semantics.

There are obviously the world champs who have to be world class. Being at 'European level' can mean being at the stage of competing for a European title. But winning the EBU title often leads directly to a title shot. Fighters like Rhodes, Macklin and McClosky would probably just be considered world level contenders in the US but in Europe the presence of the EBU title complicates the picture.
Good points made. I think there's defo a difference between being world class and being a world class contender. Barker is defo on the track to becoming a contender he's looking good.
jessi
Heavyweight
Heavyweight
Posts: 3008
Joined: 11 Jul 2010, 11:59

Re: World Level Fighters

Post by jessi »

JAHamilton77 wrote:I have heard a lot of the British posters refer to fighters as national level and European level fighters. I am not too concerned with these levels. Beyond that there is world level/world class type fighters, I am curious to see what British fighters are considered to be World Level.

I mean obviously Khan, Froch, and Haye qualify. After these three obvious ones, is there anyone else considered to be a world class fighter?
i would say at this moment in time the answer is NO ! of course we would all love to see rhodes do well, cleverly and burns are up there but not proven yet, and of course we have loads of prospects, but right now its just the 3 you already mentioned :TU:
tear up
Cruiserweight
Posts: 1832
Joined: 06 Dec 2010, 12:25

Re: World Level Fighters

Post by tear up »

Datsue wrote:
tear up wrote:
jonlcfc1 wrote:
Burns maybe?
he world champ and took it from a world class champ how he not world class come on now :witzend:

Get what you're saying mate but he's a bloke with one "world class" win, over a bloke who was world class because... Because he knocked out Nicky Cook. & since then Burnsy hasn't exactly been falling over himself to bring over a succession of tough Mexicans, Thais & South American former champions to cement his status as world class, has he? It's more the old-skool WBO route of "I've beaten a fringe-ish contender for a title, from now on you shall act as if I beat Alexis Arguello & Juan Manuel Marquez on the same night whilst I fight a succession of unheard of Africans".

I think that's why people are willing to put question marks against Burnsy. After all, Kev Mitchell beat Prescott, didn't he? But we saw what happened when the bar was raised again...
well surely he world class he beat a man who was rated world class so how does that stand burns not only because he only beat one world rated fighter :box:
Post Reply