are sky not trying to attract fan's & just fleece loyal fans

Post Reply
hurlock
Heavyweight
Heavyweight
Posts: 5687
Joined: 29 Mar 2009, 04:23

are sky not trying to attract fan's & just fleece loyal fans

Post by hurlock »

apparently mitchell v murray is planned for ppv :shame:
palooka
Light Heavyweight
Posts: 15698
Joined: 20 Jan 2012, 15:31

Re: are sky not trying to attract fan's & just fleece loyal fans

Post by palooka »

Then they, (SKY and W arren) should explain why AND if the bout is to be PPV there should be some sort of organised email protest and boycott, allegedly there are 'streams' of fights. I would like to watch the bout but if it is PPV then I think someone is taking the piss; the fighters are not paid massive amounts so where does the dough go to?
:x :x :x :x :x
:x :x :x
:x
Cas
Cruiserweight
Posts: 338
Joined: 27 Jan 2011, 10:42

Re: are sky not trying to attract fan's & just fleece loyal fans

Post by Cas »

Are you serious?
palooka
Light Heavyweight
Posts: 15698
Joined: 20 Jan 2012, 15:31

Re: are sky not trying to attract fan's & just fleece loyal fans

Post by palooka »

Cas wrote:Are you serious?
I am :x
Camcas
Cruiserweight
Posts: 881
Joined: 12 Sep 2010, 14:18

Re: are sky not trying to attract fan's & just fleece loyal fans

Post by Camcas »

Not a chance this will be PPV its only a week after the Haye fight
Finn
Heavyweight
Heavyweight
Posts: 5509
Joined: 07 May 2009, 15:56

Re: are sky not trying to attract fan's & just fleece loyal fans

Post by Finn »

no one will pay to see murray v mitchell.
earsjohn
Heavyweight
Heavyweight
Posts: 1691
Joined: 02 Sep 2006, 14:34

Re: are sky not trying to attract fan's & just fleece loyal fans

Post by earsjohn »

The only thing that stops a fight being on PPV is when the numbers don't stack up. Sky judged that Khan - McCloskey was not a PPV, so Team Khan took their ball into the Prime Time playground and by all accounts (albeit highly dubious accounts by those with a vested interest in the success of PPV) it did good numbers. If a crap fight with a weak undercard on a crap channel can do good numbers then Sky/Warren can easily justify a decent fight, with a crap undercard on SBO being PPV (as in last night).

Organised email protests are very well intentioned but the only way that PPV will stop is if boxing fans refuse to buy them. Sky / Warren know that won't happen, so the fleecing will continue.
earsjohn
Heavyweight
Heavyweight
Posts: 1691
Joined: 02 Sep 2006, 14:34

Re: are sky not trying to attract fan's & just fleece loyal fans

Post by earsjohn »

simon fox wrote: the fighters are not paid massive amounts so where does the dough go to?
:x :x :x :x :x
:x :x :x
:x
Have you seen Warrens house, car, etc? He doesn't struggle for cash.
palooka
Light Heavyweight
Posts: 15698
Joined: 20 Jan 2012, 15:31

Re: are sky not trying to attract fan's & just fleece loyal fans

Post by palooka »

earsjohn wrote:
simon fox wrote: the fighters are not paid massive amounts so where does the dough go to?
:x :x :x :x :x
:x :x :x
:x
Have you seen Warrens house, car, etc? He doesn't struggle for cash.


No but I do and there was a photo of Kevin Mitchells mums' house on here a week or 2 ago. No disrespect intended but it looked like the Mitchell family weren't rolling in it either. If I; as a working man; am to pitch in then I'd prefer that the boxers got more of a share of the money, not already wealthy people.

(A pipe dream I know :( )
Post Reply