Funtime not getting covered ?

GlobalBox
Heavyweight
Heavyweight
Posts: 2037
Joined: 10 Jun 2007, 02:57

Re: Funtime not getting covered ?

Post by GlobalBox »

Although I don't think its a step us I think it will tell us a little about Frankie's mindset, I think he has everything you need to get to the top but I would like to see him turn it up even
further when he has people in trouble, a couple of times I think the fight has gone on a couple of rounds too long when he has them ready to go, I think Frankie needs to up it when
the guy is going personally, because one day if they can hang about it might come back to haunt him, just a view.

Best of luck tonight to him and really hope its Theophane next as I think he wins that fairly comfortably as well.
Gazmac81
Heavyweight
Heavyweight
Posts: 2103
Joined: 04 Oct 2008, 10:06

Re: Funtime not getting covered ?

Post by Gazmac81 »

Are you staying at welter now then Frankie?
or is it just if the right fight fights come up

maybe the winner of upcoming Prizefighter would be good match for your fight after this if you are? :TU:


Frankie Gavin wrote:I am not worried bout any fighter in Britain believe me kell is quality an I would have to bring my a game but his got weaknesses like us all an if the fight ever happens or gets made then were see but it won't be for a while cause I won't be on Hearn bill as kell won't be on Warren bill but hopefully when I get that lil more experience over the rounds were see the best of me the better the fighter the better i will be I'm sure
cutthecacklebullyup
Heavyweight
Heavyweight
Posts: 136
Joined: 16 Aug 2010, 14:04

Re: Funtime not getting covered ?

Post by cutthecacklebullyup »

funtime certainly has the potential to be as good as any of our up and coming stars,and his performance against lomax was exceptional! perhaps he'S just not seen as charismatic and fashionable as some of the others in the promoters eyes.never the less his talent will shine through,world champ in the making! :TU:
Bennyblanco
Heavyweight
Heavyweight
Posts: 967
Joined: 19 Jul 2009, 05:01

Re: Funtime not getting covered ?

Post by Bennyblanco »

Has the tv running order been released at all?
Bard of Boxrec
Heavyweight
Heavyweight
Posts: 13114
Joined: 22 Feb 2002, 20:00

Re: Funtime not getting covered ?

Post by Bard of Boxrec »

lol at all the ridiculous hype about Frankie Gavin. People on this board are talking about him like he's freakin Rigondeaux, ffs.
tear up
Cruiserweight
Posts: 1832
Joined: 06 Dec 2010, 12:25

Re: Funtime not getting covered ?

Post by tear up »

G0mez wrote:Gavin vs Mutley is not televised ?? FFS.
x2 sorry guys but its not a comentater can shout about its 1 way traffic :box:
Camcas
Cruiserweight
Posts: 881
Joined: 12 Sep 2010, 14:18

Re: Funtime not getting covered ?

Post by Camcas »

Riddick Blowe wrote:lol at all the ridiculous hype about Frankie Gavin. People on this board are talking about him like he's freakin Rigondeaux, ffs.
X2
tear up
Cruiserweight
Posts: 1832
Joined: 06 Dec 2010, 12:25

Re: Funtime not getting covered ?

Post by tear up »

Camcas wrote:
Riddick Blowe wrote:lol at all the ridiculous hype about Frankie Gavin. People on this board are talking about him like he's freakin Rigondeaux, ffs.
X2
he is good very good but you gotta serve your time as a pro and have people talkin about on the up hell go the top but not just yet :box:
Bard of Boxrec
Heavyweight
Heavyweight
Posts: 13114
Joined: 22 Feb 2002, 20:00

Re: Funtime not getting covered ?

Post by Bard of Boxrec »

tear up wrote:
Camcas wrote:
Riddick Blowe wrote:lol at all the ridiculous hype about Frankie Gavin. People on this board are talking about him like he's freakin Rigondeaux, ffs.
X2
he is good very good but you gotta serve your time as a pro and have people talkin about on the up hell go the top but not just yet :box:
The guy just doesn't have the tools to go even near the top. If he doesn't have the pop to hurt the scrubs he's been facing with single shots, how is he going to put any sort of dent in the top guys? Any world class fighter will simply walk through him or constantly put him in long, tough wars of attrition since he doesn't have the pop to get him out of jail. Gavin's chin or defence haven't been tested yet, but he better be a Pernell Whitaker in that department to compensate for his clear lack of world class offense. something tells me he isn't though...

Face it people, the guy has shown absolutely nothing as a pro to warrant this ridiculous hype!
jessi
Heavyweight
Heavyweight
Posts: 3008
Joined: 11 Jul 2010, 11:59

Re: Funtime not getting covered ?

Post by jessi »

Riddick Blowe wrote:
tear up wrote:
Camcas wrote: X2
he is good very good but you gotta serve your time as a pro and have people talkin about on the up hell go the top but not just yet :box:
The guy just doesn't have the tools to go even near the top. If he doesn't have the pop to hurt the scrubs he's been facing with single shots, how is he going to put any sort of dent in the top guys? Any world class fighter will simply walk through him or constantly put him in long, tough wars of attrition since he doesn't have the pop to get him out of jail. Gavin's chin or defence haven't been tested yet, but he better be a Pernell Whitaker in that department to compensate for his clear lack of world class offense. something tells me he isn't though...

Face it people, the guy has shown absolutely nothing as a pro to warrant this ridiculous hype!
i dont think you understand boxing :shame:
damianhucker1
Heavyweight
Heavyweight
Posts: 3071
Joined: 20 Sep 2008, 17:36

Re: Funtime not getting covered ?

Post by damianhucker1 »

Stupid to hype Frankie so much , doesnt need any added pressure , let him learn his trade , no matter what he says on here he knows himself he wouldnt beat Kell Brook , but hes a boxer , hes hardly going to write on a public forum that he doesnt believe he would beat him , if he says it off the cuff he maybe believes it but if he really thought about it he in my opinion would know hes not quite ready yet , this is no criticism of Frankie who i think is a fantastic prospect but just give him time , he will reach his level one day but no need to add extra pressure of saying what he can possibly end up doing in future .
jessi
Heavyweight
Heavyweight
Posts: 3008
Joined: 11 Jul 2010, 11:59

Re: Funtime not getting covered ?

Post by jessi »

damianhucker1 wrote:Stupid to hype Frankie so much , doesnt need any added pressure , let him learn his trade , no matter what he says on here he knows himself he wouldnt beat Kell Brook , but hes a boxer , hes hardly going to write on a public forum that he doesnt believe he would beat him , if he says it off the cuff he maybe believes it but if he really thought about it he in my opinion would know hes not quite ready yet , this is no criticism of Frankie who i think is a fantastic prospect but just give him time , he will reach his level one day but no need to add extra pressure of saying what he can possibly end up doing in future .
if we are going to write our opinion on a boxers futre i think some how a boxing forum is the place to do it, no ones saying (frankie included) he would beat brook tomorrow, but maybe a year or so down the line ! have a nice day :wink:
damianhucker1
Heavyweight
Heavyweight
Posts: 3071
Joined: 20 Sep 2008, 17:36

Re: Funtime not getting covered ?

Post by damianhucker1 »

jessi wrote:
damianhucker1 wrote:Stupid to hype Frankie so much , doesnt need any added pressure , let him learn his trade , no matter what he says on here he knows himself he wouldnt beat Kell Brook , but hes a boxer , hes hardly going to write on a public forum that he doesnt believe he would beat him , if he says it off the cuff he maybe believes it but if he really thought about it he in my opinion would know hes not quite ready yet , this is no criticism of Frankie who i think is a fantastic prospect but just give him time , he will reach his level one day but no need to add extra pressure of saying what he can possibly end up doing in future .
if we are going to write our opinion on a boxers futre i think some how a boxing forum is the place to do it, no ones saying (frankie included) he would beat brook tomorrow, but maybe a year or so down the line ! have a nice day :wink:
Time will tell , but at this point i believe it just adds extra pressure , maybe your right , impossible to say just yet though
hurlock
Heavyweight
Heavyweight
Posts: 5687
Joined: 29 Mar 2009, 04:23

Re: Funtime not getting covered ?

Post by hurlock »

Riddick Blowe wrote:
tear up wrote:
Camcas wrote: X2
he is good very good but you gotta serve your time as a pro and have people talkin about on the up hell go the top but not just yet :box:
The guy just doesn't have the tools to go even near the top. If he doesn't have the pop to hurt the scrubs he's been facing with single shots, how is he going to put any sort of dent in the top guys? Any world class fighter will simply walk through him or constantly put him in long, tough wars of attrition since he doesn't have the pop to get him out of jail. Gavin's chin or defence haven't been tested yet, but he better be a Pernell Whitaker in that department to compensate for his clear lack of world class offense. something tells me he isn't though...

Face it people, the guy has shown absolutely nothing as a pro to warrant this ridiculous hype!
everyone loves gavin from the ams. where he was or is a legend.i think he is a little burnt out but has bags of class.fw aint going to accelerate him fwd if he's up at welter were he wont do nothing imo.
hoot
Heavyweight
Heavyweight
Posts: 192
Joined: 12 Jun 2008, 16:58

Re: Funtime not getting covered ?

Post by hoot »

I like gavin and think his time will come. SO if he aint going to campain at walter'
What is the point' what will happen to the WBO int continental belt'
if he doesent defend it within 120 days. Will he be stripped as brook was. ?
Bard of Boxrec
Heavyweight
Heavyweight
Posts: 13114
Joined: 22 Feb 2002, 20:00

Re: Funtime not getting covered ?

Post by Bard of Boxrec »

jessi wrote:
Riddick Blowe wrote:
tear up wrote: he is good very good but you gotta serve your time as a pro and have people talkin about on the up hell go the top but not just yet :box:
The guy just doesn't have the tools to go even near the top. If he doesn't have the pop to hurt the scrubs he's been facing with single shots, how is he going to put any sort of dent in the top guys? Any world class fighter will simply walk through him or constantly put him in long, tough wars of attrition since he doesn't have the pop to get him out of jail. Gavin's chin or defence haven't been tested yet, but he better be a Pernell Whitaker in that department to compensate for his clear lack of world class offense. something tells me he isn't though...

Face it people, the guy has shown absolutely nothing as a pro to warrant this ridiculous hype!
i dont think you understand boxing :shame:
Care to elaborate, scribe? Or are you a relative of his?
wesley05
Heavyweight
Heavyweight

Re: Funtime not getting covered ?

Post by wesley05 »

Piss poor :witzend: wish a would have watched price drop
Pugilist-specialist
Heavyweight
Heavyweight
Posts: 1632
Joined: 11 Jul 2008, 04:37

Re: Funtime not getting covered ?

Post by Pugilist-specialist »

jessi wrote:
danfoster wrote:
jessi wrote: let me tell you how good gavin is ! frank would put him in with amir khan within 1 year !
i promise you he wouldent dare put degale in with froch with in 2 years !
degale needs these big fights early as frank knows he hasent got world class ability !
your see my friend. :TU:
i noticed gavin went very quiet when kell asked for a shot at the WBO inter-continental (which he got stripped of before gavin got his shot)

how would you rate gavin's chances against kell?
as frankie said himself "kell is quality", but i still think frankie would be to good for him this time next year !
Why would Frankie have to wait until he's nearly 27?
jessi
Heavyweight
Heavyweight
Posts: 3008
Joined: 11 Jul 2010, 11:59

Re: Funtime not getting covered ?

Post by jessi »

Pugilist-specialist wrote:
jessi wrote:
danfoster wrote: i noticed gavin went very quiet when kell asked for a shot at the WBO inter-continental (which he got stripped of before gavin got his shot)

how would you rate gavin's chances against kell?[/quo
as frankie said himself "kell is quality", but i still think frankie would be to good for him this time next year !
Why would Frankie have to wait until he's nearly 27?
because his still a novice pro no matter what his age, fight wont happen for 2 years atleast now anyway
Bard of Boxrec
Heavyweight
Heavyweight
Posts: 13114
Joined: 22 Feb 2002, 20:00

Re: Funtime not getting covered ?

Post by Bard of Boxrec »

Brook would beat Gavin - and I don't rate Brook
Pugilist-specialist
Heavyweight
Heavyweight
Posts: 1632
Joined: 11 Jul 2008, 04:37

Re: Funtime not getting covered ?

Post by Pugilist-specialist »

jessi wrote:
Pugilist-specialist wrote:
jessi wrote: Why would Frankie have to wait until he's nearly 27?
because his still a novice pro no matter what his age, fight wont happen for 2 years atleast now anyway
Will Frankie be ready at 28?
iamasadlittleboy
Heavyweight
Heavyweight
Posts: 1877
Joined: 01 Mar 2010, 13:05

Re: Funtime not getting covered ?

Post by iamasadlittleboy »

Poor performance last night by Funtime, though he got the important win and dominated pretty much every second of the bout...just he looked lacking (and the could he had explains it).
Post Reply