Board say NO to DeGale Groves rematch request

Asterix
Heavyweight
Heavyweight
Posts: 7128
Joined: 02 Nov 2007, 10:42

Re: Board say NO to DeGale Groves rematch request

Post by Asterix »

Haha, that puts Warren in his place.
Chambers2
Heavyweight
Heavyweight
Posts: 6499
Joined: 24 Feb 2004, 07:24

Re: Board say NO to DeGale Groves rematch request

Post by Chambers2 »

It'll happen at some point. I still reckon Degale's destined for World titles
crusader
Heavyweight
Heavyweight
Posts: 16875
Joined: 19 Jan 2009, 20:14

Re: Board say NO to DeGale Groves rematch request

Post by crusader »

Chambers2 wrote:It'll happen at some point. I still reckon Degale's destined for World titles
I agree
JC
Heavyweight
Heavyweight
Posts: 4578
Joined: 07 Jan 2004, 13:04

Re: Board say NO to DeGale Groves rematch request

Post by JC »

Good, I think DeGale needs to take it like a man, move on and use this loss as motivation. I don't think his management are doing him any favours by telling he's owed a rematch.

If he's got the talent, which he clearly has, he'll get his chance in the future.
alexpaterson
Heavyweight
Heavyweight
Posts: 4310
Joined: 22 Feb 2009, 11:22

Re: Board say NO to DeGale Groves rematch request

Post by alexpaterson »

I'm glad the rematch isn't happening! Hopefully both men move on and make a massive rematch down the line.
gobbles
Heavyweight
Heavyweight
Posts: 2682
Joined: 18 Dec 2003, 15:04

Re: Board say NO to DeGale Groves rematch request

Post by gobbles »

alexpaterson wrote:I'm glad the rematch isn't happening! Hopefully both men move on and make a massive rematch down the line.

I agree. Both will have really made their name in the wider public domain after Saturday. Everytime either fights a rematch will get a mention and it will be just massive in 18 months-2 years, which can only be good for British boxing
freddydoesdallas
Cruiserweight
Posts: 9436
Joined: 02 Sep 2010, 13:48

Re: Board say NO to DeGale Groves rematch request

Post by freddydoesdallas »

Good decision by the board. It was a close fight but not a robbery and to bow to demands of an immediate rematch would set a precedent
Asterix
Heavyweight
Heavyweight
Posts: 7128
Joined: 02 Nov 2007, 10:42

Re: Board say NO to DeGale Groves rematch request

Post by Asterix »

gobbles wrote:
alexpaterson wrote:I'm glad the rematch isn't happening! Hopefully both men move on and make a massive rematch down the line.
I agree. Both will have really made their name in the wider public domain after Saturday. Everytime either fights a rematch will get a mention and it will be just massive in 18 months-2 years, which can only be good for British boxing
I agree with both of you. :TU:
leforge
Heavyweight
Heavyweight
Posts: 7790
Joined: 04 Mar 2005, 12:44

Re: Board say NO to DeGale Groves rematch request

Post by leforge »

gobbles wrote:
alexpaterson wrote:I'm glad the rematch isn't happening! Hopefully both men move on and make a massive rematch down the line.

I agree. Both will have really made their name in the wider public domain after Saturday. Everytime either fights a rematch will get a mention and it will be just massive in 18 months-2 years, which can only be good for British boxing
Be much bigger fight then could fill a football ground with right promotion.
Josh1111
Cruiserweight
Posts: 874
Joined: 02 Sep 2010, 05:50

Re: Board say NO to DeGale Groves rematch request

Post by Josh1111 »

Groves should now try and get a euro shot whilst Degale should fight Anderson as a British eliminator
DougieC30
Heavyweight
Heavyweight
Posts: 586
Joined: 20 Dec 2009, 15:00

Re: Board say NO to DeGale Groves rematch request

Post by DougieC30 »

Agree with all on here, its a good thing they anit boxing again straight away. Let it simmer for a while then it could be huge in a year or two. I think Warren said he's goni try get Degale out again in July, if he does it will be interesting to see who he gets for him. As for Groves, this win opens so many doors for him so he could be in with anyone next.
IRLangmaid25
Cruiserweight
Posts: 3316
Joined: 01 Feb 2010, 19:08

Re: Board say NO to DeGale Groves rematch request

Post by IRLangmaid25 »

I think the Board got it right, was a voluntary defence for both James DeGale and George Groves and the judges at ringside got decision right so there is no justification for an immediate rematch between DeGale and Groves at all, although when they are both in possession of world title fights I would not rule out a tasty rematch in the future packing out the O2 again. Groves' aim should be win the Lonsdale outright go for a European title shot and after that who knows. DeGale's aim should be get back into the ring as soon as possible rebuild his confidence with the aim of pushing again for the British title in the next 12-18 months when he has got a good run of results in tough fights that has restored his confidence and has won an eliminator for the title.
Pat Butcher
Heavyweight
Heavyweight
Posts: 227
Joined: 06 Jul 2008, 04:40

Re: Board say NO to DeGale Groves rematch request

Post by Pat Butcher »

Superb use of that photograph for that story :TU:
stujones
Heavyweight
Heavyweight
Posts: 27513
Joined: 29 Aug 2003, 15:08

Re: Board say NO to DeGale Groves rematch request

Post by stujones »

It is a good decision not to grant an immediate rematch based on the result. Whilst I like to see immediate rematches for robberies, it shouldn't be the case for close decision. Is Kenny Anderson going to be the Mandatory (He was supposed to be fighting Groves in an eliminator). I can see Degale being installed as the next mandatory, and I would also agree with that. I do appreciate the "get back in the line" message of the BBBoC in that press release, but its not a very deep line is it. We don't really know where we stand with Magee, and who could also be considered..... Fielding?
Ezzard
Heavyweight
Heavyweight
Posts: 11181
Joined: 12 May 2005, 09:20

Re: Board say NO to DeGale Groves rematch request

Post by Ezzard »

Groves got his win and if i were him i'd hold off for a rematch until there's a world belt involved. Groves has secured himself a big money fight for the future with that win.
rapid2
Heavyweight
Heavyweight
Posts: 93
Joined: 22 Jan 2010, 20:02

Re: Board say NO to DeGale Groves rematch request

Post by rapid2 »

good.
cocobongo
Heavyweight
Heavyweight
Posts: 358
Joined: 09 Jun 2010, 13:02

Re: Board say NO to DeGale Groves rematch request

Post by cocobongo »

just a query what is the boards policy on ordering rematches why is this different to say when they orded a fury big john rematch?
Pat Butcher
Heavyweight
Heavyweight
Posts: 227
Joined: 06 Jul 2008, 04:40

Re: Board say NO to DeGale Groves rematch request

Post by Pat Butcher »

cocobongo wrote:just a query what is the boards policy on ordering rematches why is this different to say when they orded a fury big john rematch?
Difference between the Fury - McDermott result to this is the Fury fight was a controvertial decision. Groves - DeGale was just tight but no robbery
King Tubby
Heavyweight
Heavyweight
Posts: 6306
Joined: 16 Nov 2007, 06:52

Re: Board say NO to DeGale Groves rematch request

Post by King Tubby »

Is the Groves fight being shown on Sky this week?
THEBUTCH
Heavyweight
Heavyweight
Posts: 6645
Joined: 27 Jan 2004, 08:51

Re: Board say NO to DeGale Groves rematch request

Post by THEBUTCH »

Glad to see the Board found their balls and made the right decision.

Grove has got his own career to get on with now....he's the man.

Does this mean Warren will revert to his old ways of WBU titles again :?? :lol:
Bard of Boxrec
Heavyweight
Heavyweight
Posts: 13114
Joined: 22 Feb 2002, 20:00

Re: Board say NO to DeGale Groves rematch request

Post by Bard of Boxrec »

Why is everyone talking about this 'big money fight down the line for 'world honours'??'

Does everyone really think BOTH guys will get far enough for this to be realistic? I'm saying neither even get past Euro level.
Camcas
Cruiserweight
Posts: 881
Joined: 12 Sep 2010, 14:18

Re: Board say NO to DeGale Groves rematch request

Post by Camcas »

I would rather see them fight each other again than someone like Anderson or Smith
milpool
Cruiserweight
Posts: 5402
Joined: 18 May 2011, 13:38

Re: Board say NO to DeGale Groves rematch request

Post by milpool »

Pat Butcher wrote:
Superb use of that photograph for that story :TU:
My thoughts exactly ;;-)
Ketchel
Heavyweight
Heavyweight
Posts: 868
Joined: 17 Nov 2008, 14:18

Re: Board say NO to DeGale Groves rematch request

Post by Ketchel »

Camcas wrote:I would rather see them fight each other again than someone like Anderson or Smith
The Groves v Degale fight was not that great that I would not want to see it again in the short term. The Groves V Anderson fight however was a cracker and Anderson came in a short notice for that fight. Groves V Anderson II with Anderson getting full notice would be the fight I'd rather see.
Post Reply