refere Ian Lewis ( Dallas fight, Hopkins fight)

Post Reply
boxbet
Heavyweight
Heavyweight
Posts: 363
Joined: 09 Sep 2005, 11:01

refere Ian Lewis ( Dallas fight, Hopkins fight)

Post by boxbet »

I thought boxing had sum corruption in it. To me this was clear in the Dallas fight, Promoters ref giving the fight to the promoters fighter. Then this ref fails to notice 2 knockdowns from hopkins to try to ensure house fighter wins. BUT then when I think all of boxing is a corrupt load of shit and more like WWE wrestling, Groves gets a descision which I thought Warren would never have allowed, I think there is hope in our sport!
Newport Daz
Cruiserweight
Posts: 687
Joined: 31 Aug 2010, 07:26

Re: refere Ian Lewis ( Dallas fight, Hopkins fight)

Post by Newport Daz »

boxbet wrote:I thought boxing had sum corruption in it. To me this was clear in the Dallas fight, Promoters ref giving the fight to the promoters fighter. Then this ref fails to notice 2 knockdowns from hopkins to try to ensure house fighter wins. BUT then when I think all of boxing is a corrupt load of shit and more like WWE wrestling, Groves gets a descision which I thought Warren would never have allowed, I think there is hope in our sport!
In fairness to IJL, BHop admitted that Pascal slipped both times in the post fight presser.
crusader
Heavyweight
Heavyweight
Posts: 16875
Joined: 19 Jan 2009, 20:14

Re: refere Ian Lewis ( Dallas fight, Hopkins fight)

Post by crusader »

Newport Daz wrote:
boxbet wrote:I thought boxing had sum corruption in it. To me this was clear in the Dallas fight, Promoters ref giving the fight to the promoters fighter. Then this ref fails to notice 2 knockdowns from hopkins to try to ensure house fighter wins. BUT then when I think all of boxing is a corrupt load of shit and more like WWE wrestling, Groves gets a descision which I thought Warren would never have allowed, I think there is hope in our sport!
In fairness to IJL, BHop admitted that Pascal slipped both times in the post fight presser.
The replays showed that Pascal went to the canvas immediatly after Hopkins hit him with a punch. According to the rules I believe those should have been ruled knockdowns regardless of what Bhop said. If the fight ended up being a draw again I'm sure Hopkins would have had a different opinion.
Loynesy
Heavyweight
Heavyweight
Posts: 1767
Joined: 26 Sep 2003, 08:29

Re: refere Ian Lewis ( Dallas fight, Hopkins fight)

Post by Loynesy »

Crusader

You know fight rules. The punch has to cause the knockdown, not facilitate it when the other fighter is already off balance. Both of the calls were correct under the rules.
boxbet
Heavyweight
Heavyweight
Posts: 363
Joined: 09 Sep 2005, 11:01

Re: refere Ian Lewis ( Dallas fight, Hopkins fight)

Post by boxbet »

Loynesy wrote:Crusader

You know fight rules. The punch has to cause the knockdown, not facilitate it when the other fighter is already off balance. Both of the calls were correct under the rules.
As long as its for the house fighter yeah?
crusader
Heavyweight
Heavyweight
Posts: 16875
Joined: 19 Jan 2009, 20:14

Re: refere Ian Lewis ( Dallas fight, Hopkins fight)

Post by crusader »

Loynesy wrote:Crusader

You know fight rules. The punch has to cause the knockdown, not facilitate it when the other fighter is already off balance. Both of the calls were correct under the rules.
In round ten Pascal was clearly balanced until Hopkins right him with a right hand. It was only after the punch landed that his balance went. In round eight Pascal would not have touched down if Hopkins hadn't landed a right hand.

We must have a different understanding of the rules. Under all of the sets of rules I have read a knockdown is to be called in the cases where a punch connects with a fighter and causes that fighter to touch down in some way. This means that if a fighter would not have gone down without getting hit it should be ruled a knockdown regardless of how balanced they were. Plenty of fighters get dropped largely due to being off balance; this is commonly referred to as a "balance shot" and most refs will start a count.
Last edited by crusader on 26 May 2011, 17:03, edited 1 time in total.
DIRT SUGAR
Heavyweight
Heavyweight
Posts: 1200
Joined: 29 Aug 2003, 11:48

Re: refere Ian Lewis ( Dallas fight, Hopkins fight)

Post by DIRT SUGAR »

My paper had interview with Ian today and he said that he didn't call the knockdowns as he felt Pascal was off-balance and he said the canvas was quite slippery and it was more to do with that than Hopkins' punches that caused Pascal to go down. He said he'd looked at re-runs of the fight and feels he made the right decision.
J
Heavyweight
Heavyweight
Posts: 8015
Joined: 17 Feb 2004, 12:39

Re: refere Ian Lewis ( Dallas fight, Hopkins fight)

Post by J »

Seriously pisses me off to hear refs such as Ian lated as bent.

i have no doubt he is straight as a die and makes decisions there and then in best of faith.
crusader
Heavyweight
Heavyweight
Posts: 16875
Joined: 19 Jan 2009, 20:14

Re: refere Ian Lewis ( Dallas fight, Hopkins fight)

Post by crusader »

I have seen Lewis ref a few world level fights now (Aydin-Dan, Briggs-Klitschko, Hopkins-Pascal) and I thought he did a poor job in all of them. I have also seen him turn in several atrocious scorecards. I'm not saying that Lewis is corrupt, but I do think that he is a poor official, regardless of whether his decisions are made in the best of faith.
whiskey
Heavyweight
Heavyweight
Posts: 11956
Joined: 27 Mar 2007, 14:52

Re: refere Ian Lewis ( Dallas fight, Hopkins fight)

Post by whiskey »

I dont think he was that bad in JP bs BH II.

Naturally the Dallas situ was awful, cant defend you on that one Ian.
iamasadlittleboy
Heavyweight
Heavyweight
Posts: 1877
Joined: 01 Mar 2010, 13:05

Re: refere Ian Lewis ( Dallas fight, Hopkins fight)

Post by iamasadlittleboy »

The Ainscough scorecard that IJL did the other month...****ing joke. He should have been dragged over the coals for that.
Post Reply