Are you off your fcking nut' Do you think brook being a top ingle fighter from a kid' has no movement or skill' just raw power' you are delusional' kell would absolutely destroy him.gobbles wrote:Gavin wins - easily
Brook V Gavin
Re: Brook V Gavin
-
IRLangmaid25
- Cruiserweight
- Posts: 3316
- Joined: 01 Feb 2010, 19:08
Re: Brook V Gavin
I'll take Brook over Gavin for me.
Re: Brook V Gavin
it would be a good fight and kell has called for it but the silence from gavin and mr wa rren has been deafening. i personally think that kell would walk straight thru gavin but i am biased.
gobbles - i know you are a knowledgeable fella. just curious as to why you back gavin so emphatically? interested to know your reasoning ...
gobbles - i know you are a knowledgeable fella. just curious as to why you back gavin so emphatically? interested to know your reasoning ...
-
horndawg80
- Cruiserweight
- Posts: 486
- Joined: 26 Apr 2011, 00:25
Re: Brook V Gavin
Sorry I am being a doughnut. I don't think my keyboard likes Frank W a r r en! I know Kell is with Matchroom, it is on every other post!!!!
I was referring to Jennings.
I was referring to Jennings.
Re: Brook V Gavin
People read to much into a bad performance IMO
Groves v Anderson was shocking and because of that people had written him off against degale and then he beat him boxing really well
Gavins last fight want that impressive agreed but he is an amazing talent and although I couldn't pick a winner as kell brook is relatively untested also, all I'm saying is don't write Gavin off
Groves v Anderson was shocking and because of that people had written him off against degale and then he beat him boxing really well
Gavins last fight want that impressive agreed but he is an amazing talent and although I couldn't pick a winner as kell brook is relatively untested also, all I'm saying is don't write Gavin off
-
Happy Slapper
- Heavyweight

- Posts: 499
- Joined: 20 Jul 2008, 16:22
Re: Brook V Gavin
Boring fight I reckon. Brook probably edges a decision.
-
Frankie Gavin
- Heavyweight

- Posts: 393
- Joined: 09 Jul 2009, 17:39
Re: Brook V Gavin
I don't mind who I fight like I always have said if I keep winning titles will come an if its kell I fight next so be it
Re: Brook V Gavin
Calm down dear, it's only an opinionhoot wrote:Are you off your fcking nut' Do you think brook being a top ingle fighter from a kid' has no movement or skill' just raw power' you are delusional' kell would absolutely destroy him.gobbles wrote:Gavin wins - easily
-
Counter-puncher
- Heavyweight

- Posts: 39141
- Joined: 20 May 2008, 11:41
Re: Brook V Gavin
all i will say is it looked to me, against jennings, that kell needed to get his feet set to punch and was waiting a bit to do so.
and that Gavin would give him a tough time getting his feet set for power shots, keeping him a little bit offbalance. IMO
and that Gavin would give him a tough time getting his feet set for power shots, keeping him a little bit offbalance. IMO
Re: Brook V Gavin
yet jennings gets opportunities (cotto, brook) and puts in really negative performances. not sure i'd want this.horndawg80 wrote:Powder Puff Vs Kell Brook
(Only one winner and it isn't our Brummie friend)
I think Gavin should take on Jennings and see where he is at. Both are with allegedly. It would be easy to make although Jennings is slightly delusional thinking he should be fighting for world titles.
-
Counter-puncher
- Heavyweight

- Posts: 39141
- Joined: 20 May 2008, 11:41
Re: Brook V Gavin
i think you're badly underestimating a close decision loss to Mutley and a win over Ross Minter, in terms of Jennings' formline...Autobarn wrote:yet jennings gets opportunities (cotto, brook) and puts in really negative performances. not sure i'd want this.horndawg80 wrote:Powder Puff Vs Kell Brook
(Only one winner and it isn't our Brummie friend)
I think Gavin should take on Jennings and see where he is at. Both are with allegedly. It would be easy to make although Jennings is slightly delusional thinking he should be fighting for world titles.
Re: Brook V Gavin
Gavin isn't ready for Brook yet.
-
Pugilist-specialist
- Heavyweight

- Posts: 1632
- Joined: 11 Jul 2008, 04:37
Re: Brook V Gavin
It would appear that his team agree with you. They withdrew him from an English title contest with Amar and are now looking towards Curtis Woodhouse.Cas wrote:Gavin isn't ready for Brook yet.
-
mickey1975
- Heavyweight

- Posts: 23018
- Joined: 02 Mar 2009, 12:54
Re: Brook V Gavin
Whats the point in signing to fight Amar though when you can almost guarantee he will pull out? Woodhouse will be an easy fight for him but can see the promoters angle, ex Birmingham footballer, etc.Pugilist-specialist wrote:It would appear that his team agree with you. They withdrew him from an English title contest with Amar and are now looking towards Curtis Woodhouse.Cas wrote:Gavin isn't ready for Brook yet.
Re: Brook V Gavin
Kevin Mcintyre had made Matchmakers aware month ago that he would fight Gavin if hes looking for welterweight fight.
hes in Prizefighter now but July would have been ideal
hes in Prizefighter now but July would have been ideal
-
wesley05
- Heavyweight

Re: Brook V Gavin
Kell would pick Gavin off for around 4 rounds then stop him IMO but can't see w@rren riskin his little sweet pea with kell ;;-)
-
TerribleTerry
- Heavyweight

- Posts: 5272
- Joined: 29 Aug 2003, 12:30
Re: Brook V Gavin
Frankie Gavin would outbox Kell once he had adjusted to his speed - all round better fundamentals and better boxing skills.
I have always thought Brook carries his chin to high - Gavin would find it.
I have always thought Brook carries his chin to high - Gavin would find it.
Re: Brook V Gavin
I'm not convinced that Frankie is a bone fide welter where as Brook looks like he has to make weight to get to 10 stone 7. Gavin is talented and has some lovely moves, he also has power; not shocking KO power but he hits hard enough from the looks of it. Frankie is not running around the ring jabbing away, every bout I've seen him in he is pressing the fight. If he punched light the other fella would push him back and walk him down.
At welter I imagine Kell Brook would be too strong and hit too hard; at light welter or catch weight (say 144) then Frankie is in with a real chance. He hit Muttley some lovely body shots and I imagine Brook would expend more energy actually throwing shots than Muttley.
At welter I imagine Kell Brook would be too strong and hit too hard; at light welter or catch weight (say 144) then Frankie is in with a real chance. He hit Muttley some lovely body shots and I imagine Brook would expend more energy actually throwing shots than Muttley.
-
horndawg80
- Cruiserweight
- Posts: 486
- Joined: 26 Apr 2011, 00:25
Re: Brook V Gavin
I'm not an Frankie Gavin fan but he would nail Amar! I've seen Amar and he is pony!
Re: Brook V Gavin
I disagree my friend, he is not pony. He is rangy, slippery and a difficult awkward fighter.horndawg80 wrote:I'm not an Frankie Gavin fan but he would nail Amar! I've seen Amar and he is pony!
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=G79eEyMQpIo
-
horndawg80
- Cruiserweight
- Posts: 486
- Joined: 26 Apr 2011, 00:25
Re: Brook V Gavin
He has been a pro for 8 years now and IMO there are half a dozen UK welterweights better than him.
Maybe he is so slippery they can't get him into the ring? October 2009 was his last outing.
Maybe he is so slippery they can't get him into the ring? October 2009 was his last outing.
-
TerribleTerry
- Heavyweight

- Posts: 5272
- Joined: 29 Aug 2003, 12:30
Re: Brook V Gavin
I would back him to beat Brook right now.MachoMan09 wrote:In 18-24 months time, Frankie would box Kell's ears off.
-
Counter-puncher
- Heavyweight

- Posts: 39141
- Joined: 20 May 2008, 11:41
Re: Brook V Gavin
horndawg80 wrote:He has been a pro for 8 years now and IMO there are half a dozen UK welterweights better than him.
Maybe he is so slippery they can't get him into the ring? October 2009 was his last outing.
posted from another thread:
G0mez wrote:I know Adnan and have his number. He is still working out, I spar sometimes with his brother Mo and Adnan is without a promoter and elimnator fights have fell through of late up in scotland etc.Counter-puncher wrote:amar certainly big at the weight and extremely awkward but i would guess there's more to it than that behind him fighting twice in 4 years.....G0mez wrote:When I was at a weigh in at Nottingham before Frankie signed terms with anyone, he was stood near Amar (think it was Witter vs Bradley) and he is a big lad, more suited to 154 than 147.
But Amar is unorthadox, pretty strong and slippery - not a great recipe to showcase a fighter; It's likely the reason he hasn't fought too often of late either.
.
He wants to fight, believe me.
Re: Brook V Gavin
Terrible Terry time to revisit this post' Brook would smash gavin to bits in one'TerribleTerry wrote:I would back him to beat Brook right now.MachoMan09 wrote:In 18-24 months time, Frankie would box Kell's ears off.