ALL LICENCE HOLDERS

Post Reply
princess
Heavyweight
Heavyweight
Posts: 900
Joined: 06 Oct 2009, 18:11

ALL LICENCE HOLDERS

Post by princess »

Theres is a Boxing board AGM June 15th The Midlands Manchester We need all licence holders to turn out We are planning the biggest turnout ever We have to pull together on his one to stop licence fees going up again and get he sport we all love governed properly While Robert Smith is in Las Vegas at The IBF convention
We dont even sanction IBF title fights in Britain by the way and Charlie Giles is being wined and dined at Carls fight in Alantic City
We need to know if this is the reason licence fees are going up We are even going to ask if they flew out there first class or economy Ill guarentee it was first class Come on licence holders if you dont turn up You cant moan when the board screw us over See you all on the 15th Jane
Jeff Thomas
Heavyweight
Heavyweight
Posts: 3016
Joined: 30 Apr 2009, 06:32

Re: ALL LICENCE HOLDERS

Post by Jeff Thomas »

The prices for licences is ridiculous- best of luck with that
phil5555
Heavyweight
Heavyweight
Posts: 378
Joined: 02 Jan 2009, 10:28

Re: ALL LICENCE HOLDERS

Post by phil5555 »

What chance will small hall promoters have if the fees go up.
Benelio
Cruiserweight
Posts: 601
Joined: 02 May 2011, 05:57

Re: ALL LICENCE HOLDERS

Post by Benelio »

Edited by mod.
jonp
Heavyweight
Heavyweight
Posts: 2081
Joined: 29 Mar 2007, 12:44

Re: ALL LICENCE HOLDERS

Post by jonp »

Im going.
princess
Heavyweight
Heavyweight
Posts: 900
Joined: 06 Oct 2009, 18:11

Re: ALL LICENCE HOLDERS

Post by princess »

phil5555 wrote:What chance will small hall promoters have if the fees go up.

None we have to get all licence holders there if we get enough we can stop it But its no good moaning if we dont turn up
princess
Heavyweight
Heavyweight
Posts: 900
Joined: 06 Oct 2009, 18:11

Re: ALL LICENCE HOLDERS

Post by princess »

jonp wrote:Im going.

im ringing everyone today jon and put it on facebook and twiiter Jeff see you there and can u tell everyone cheers hun x
LeedsLad
Heavyweight
Heavyweight
Posts: 996
Joined: 02 Jul 2010, 06:15

Re: ALL LICENCE HOLDERS

Post by LeedsLad »

Is this an attempt by the IBF to get the board to sanction interalphabetty title fights?
Glyn Leach
Heavyweight
Heavyweight
Posts: 2135
Joined: 25 Dec 2007, 14:08

Re: ALL LICENCE HOLDERS

Post by Glyn Leach »

princess wrote:Theres is a Boxing board AGM June 15th The Midlands Manchester We need all licence holders to turn out We are planning the biggest turnout ever We have to pull together on his one to stop licence fees going up again and get he sport we all love governed properly While Robert Smith is in Las Vegas at The IBF convention
We dont even sanction IBF title fights in Britain by the way and Charlie Giles is being wined and dined at Carls fight in Alantic City
We need to know if this is the reason licence fees are going up We are even going to ask if they flew out there first class or economy Ill guarentee it was first class Come on licence holders if you dont turn up You cant moan when the board screw us over See you all on the 15th Jane
Good call Jane, this really is something that needs to be highlighted. The Board will never be as bad as FIFA, but still as a self-appointed body it should be whiter than white and such things as Smith attending the IBF conference just don't sit right. If you don't deal with them, why go? And if you do end up dealing with them, people being people will assume that a nice trip to Vegas had something to do with it. Just not a very smart move by Smith.

Re Giles in Atlantic City, obviously there should be a Board representative at any fight abroad involving a Brit — and there isn't, for instance when Michael Sprott fights in Germany. They all pay licence fees to the Board, if one is worth representing abroad, they all are — or none of them are. It also makes a nonsense of the Board knocking back Mick Hennessy's proposed Spanish show — you can bet your arse they would have had a representative there to make sure things ran accordingly, so why they flat refused it, and with no reason offered according to Hennessy, becomes questionable.

A rise in the licence fee at this point in time, in a recession, is unrealistic. Increased operating costs is no excuse, the Board should just swallow that, like so many of us are. For instance, BM's operating costs rise and rise, but there's no way I'd consider raising the cover price in the middle of a recession. You just can't do that, you have to suffer the losses when the whole country is struggling (and the Board can afford to suffer those losses far more than BM can, believe me). Sky's taking Khan-McCloskey off PPV reflects this attitude.

I really hope that licence holders will attend this meeting in force and make their feelings known. Good luck Jane, I can be certain that you, for one, will let them have it. I just hope your fellow licence holders have your balls and stand up to be counted.
Scottrf
Cruiserweight
Posts: 1146
Joined: 30 Nov 2010, 05:43

Re: ALL LICENCE HOLDERS

Post by Scottrf »

The BBBofC doesn't sanction IBF title fights? So Wlad would lose that belt if fighting in this country, or Cloud if he fought Cleverly here? You wouldn't be able to have an IBF title fight in Britain? Can someone explain how it works please.
princess
Heavyweight
Heavyweight
Posts: 900
Joined: 06 Oct 2009, 18:11

Re: ALL LICENCE HOLDERS

Post by princess »

LeedsLad wrote:Is this an attempt by the IBF to get the board to sanction interalphabetty title fights?
God i hope not but its the licence holders that paid for the trip to Vegas
jonny
Heavyweight
Heavyweight
Posts: 707
Joined: 29 Mar 2004, 08:42

Re: ALL LICENCE HOLDERS

Post by jonny »

We have had many IBF title fights over here Hatton, Calzaghe, Woods Ingle were all IBF World champions and Michael Hunter, Jason Booth both challenging Steve Molitor for there title, plus others
princess
Heavyweight
Heavyweight
Posts: 900
Joined: 06 Oct 2009, 18:11

Re: ALL LICENCE HOLDERS

Post by princess »

Glyn Leach wrote:
princess wrote:Theres is a Boxing board AGM June 15th The Midlands Manchester We need all licence holders to turn out We are planning the biggest turnout ever We have to pull together on his one to stop licence fees going up again and get he sport we all love governed properly While Robert Smith is in Las Vegas at The IBF convention
We dont even sanction IBF title fights in Britain by the way and Charlie Giles is being wined and dined at Carls fight in Alantic City
We need to know if this is the reason licence fees are going up We are even going to ask if they flew out there first class or economy Ill guarentee it was first class Come on licence holders if you dont turn up You cant moan when the board screw us over See you all on the 15th Jane
Good call Jane, this really is something that needs to be highlighted. The Board will never be as bad as FIFA, but still as a self-appointed body it should be whiter than white and such things as Smith attending the IBF conference just don't sit right. If you don't deal with them, why go? And if you do end up dealing with them, people being people will assume that a nice trip to Vegas had something to do with it. Just not a very smart move by Smith.

Re Giles in Atlantic City, obviously there should be a Board representative at any fight abroad involving a Brit — and there isn't, for instance when Michael Sprott fights in Germany. They all pay licence fees to the Board, if one is worth representing abroad, they all are — or none of them are. It also makes a nonsense of the Board knocking back Mick Hennessy's proposed Spanish show — you can bet your arse they would have had a representative there to make sure things ran accordingly, so why they flat refused it, and with no reason offered according to Hennessy, becomes questionable.

A rise in the licence fee at this point in time, in a recession, is unrealistic. Increased operating costs is no excuse, the Board should just swallow that, like so many of us are. For instance, BM's operating costs rise and rise, but there's no way I'd consider raising the cover price in the middle of a recession. You just can't do that, you have to suffer the losses when the whole country is struggling (and the Board can afford to suffer those losses far more than BM can, believe me). Sky's taking Khan-McCloskey off PPV reflects this attitude.

I really hope that licence holders will attend this meeting in force and make their feelings known. Good luck Jane, I can be certain that you, for one, will let them have it. I just hope your fellow licence holders have your balls and stand up to be counted.
Cheers Glyn just got to get them all there supporting it I fought abroad 34 times in my career paid 5% of my purse to the board and never had a representive there Actually im lying I did when Lennox Lewis fought Vitali in LA i was on the undercard fighting Riker They came to that one Funny that aint it
The licence holders have to turn up to this AGM If this kind of thing carries on it will end up worse than FIFA
Glyn Leach
Heavyweight
Heavyweight
Posts: 2135
Joined: 25 Dec 2007, 14:08

Re: ALL LICENCE HOLDERS

Post by Glyn Leach »

jonny wrote:We have had many IBF title fights over here Hatton, Calzaghe, Woods Ingle were all IBF World champions and Michael Hunter, Jason Booth both challenging Steve Molitor for there title, plus others
Had. That's the word in question Jonny. Different from having.
Scottrf
Cruiserweight
Posts: 1146
Joined: 30 Nov 2010, 05:43

Re: ALL LICENCE HOLDERS

Post by Scottrf »

Glyn Leach wrote:
jonny wrote:We have had many IBF title fights over here Hatton, Calzaghe, Woods Ingle were all IBF World champions and Michael Hunter, Jason Booth both challenging Steve Molitor for there title, plus others
Had. That's the word in question Jonny. Different from having.
Yeah, when did it start and what is the impact r.e. my previous post?
jonny
Heavyweight
Heavyweight
Posts: 707
Joined: 29 Mar 2004, 08:42

Re: ALL LICENCE HOLDERS

Post by jonny »

Glyn Leach wrote:
jonny wrote:We have had many IBF title fights over here Hatton, Calzaghe, Woods Ingle were all IBF World champions and Michael Hunter, Jason Booth both challenging Steve Molitor for there title, plus others
Had. That's the word in question Jonny. Different from having.
Booth v Molitor was only last year (9 months ago actually) its down to the promoters to put the fights on not the Board. IBF have been in this country for years since I thing when Glen McCrory was there champion probably even further. Clinton woods had many defences over here.
Last edited by jonny on 02 Jun 2011, 05:58, edited 2 times in total.
jonny
Heavyweight
Heavyweight
Posts: 707
Joined: 29 Mar 2004, 08:42

Re: ALL LICENCE HOLDERS

Post by jonny »

Because Jane Couch says they dont sanction them doesn't mean its right Glyn
princess
Heavyweight
Heavyweight
Posts: 900
Joined: 06 Oct 2009, 18:11

Re: ALL LICENCE HOLDERS

Post by princess »

jonny wrote:Because Jane Couch says they dont sanction them doesn't mean its right Glyn
We ARE afflitated to the IBF But currently have no IBF champions or any IBF fights coming up Thats not to say that wont change because it probably will Now Robert is at the convention My point was simply The licence holders are paying for the trip and Jonny im just trying to stand up for the licence holders and believe me Its not often GL agrees with me He is simply pointing out the fact something not right Hennessy was refused to hold the Fury v Chisora abroad By the board and represent certain fighters abroad which is wrong we all pay licence fees and should all be treated the same
AliAsghar
Cruiserweight
Posts: 110
Joined: 31 May 2011, 18:01

Re: ALL LICENCE HOLDERS

Post by AliAsghar »

princess wrote:
jonny wrote:Because Jane Couch says they dont sanction them doesn't mean its right Glyn
We ARE afflitated to the IBF But currently have no IBF champions or any IBF fights coming up Thats not to say that wont change because it probably will Now Robert is at the convention My point was simply The licence holders are paying for the trip and Jonny im just trying to stand up for the licence holders and believe me Its not often GL agrees with me He is simply pointing out the fact something not right Hennessy was refused to hold the Fury v Chisora abroad By the board and represent certain fighters abroad which is wrong we all pay licence fees and should all be treated the same

definitley all should be treated the same well said!!!
Glyn Leach
Heavyweight
Heavyweight
Posts: 2135
Joined: 25 Dec 2007, 14:08

Re: ALL LICENCE HOLDERS

Post by Glyn Leach »

jonny wrote:Because Jane Couch says they dont sanction them doesn't mean its right Glyn
Hands up, I could have put it better Jonny, fair play mate — we just haven't been in their orbit for a while and there's no sign of it changing, so why are they of concern to us?
jonny
Heavyweight
Heavyweight
Posts: 707
Joined: 29 Mar 2004, 08:42

Re: ALL LICENCE HOLDERS

Post by jonny »

Glyn Leach wrote:
jonny wrote:Because Jane Couch says they dont sanction them doesn't mean its right Glyn
Hands up, I could have put it better Jonny, fair play mate — we just haven't been in their orbit for a while and there's no sign of it changing, so why are they of concern to us?
Yeah I see what you mean Glyn...But we could very soon Have the IBF heavyweight Champion :TU: together with his WBA
Glyn Leach
Heavyweight
Heavyweight
Posts: 2135
Joined: 25 Dec 2007, 14:08

Re: ALL LICENCE HOLDERS

Post by Glyn Leach »

jonny wrote:
Glyn Leach wrote:
jonny wrote:Because Jane Couch says they dont sanction them doesn't mean its right Glyn
Hands up, I could have put it better Jonny, fair play mate — we just haven't been in their orbit for a while and there's no sign of it changing, so why are they of concern to us?
Yeah I see what you mean Glyn...But we could very soon Have the IBF heavyweight Champion :TU: together with his WBA
True and I'm sure there will be loads of IBF types in Hamburg for the Board representatives to talk to. But the Vegas jaunt seems a bit unnecessary in the current financial climate — it's one of those where I find myself asking whether they'd be bothering if the conference was being staged in Kazakhstan.
princess
Heavyweight
Heavyweight
Posts: 900
Joined: 06 Oct 2009, 18:11

Re: ALL LICENCE HOLDERS

Post by princess »

Thanks steve Wood Miranda Carter mickey helliett Jon Pegg Steve Goodwin Glyn Rhodes Dean Powell Tommy Gilmour PJ Rowson and everyone else who is rounding up ALL Licence holders for the boards AGM JUNE 15TH Manchester Anyone else that can help get in touch We are looking for the biggest turnout to a AGM
jonp
Heavyweight
Heavyweight
Posts: 2081
Joined: 29 Mar 2007, 12:44

Re: ALL LICENCE HOLDERS

Post by jonp »

If anybody from our neck of the woods wants to go but cant get a lift contact me you can get in with us
jonny
Heavyweight
Heavyweight
Posts: 707
Joined: 29 Mar 2004, 08:42

Re: ALL LICENCE HOLDERS

Post by jonny »

How much are the license fees going up by for promoters
Post Reply