jAsterix wrote:I agree with glahn.Deserter wrote:Really?!glahn wrote:he's probably at his peak.
Well, I'll answer you both at the same time, as i'm amazed that you think having a year's lay-off followed by one fight against Spada constitutes the type of preparation needed to get Barker to his 'peak'.
A fighter reaches his peak not just through genetics (age) but through experience and fights that provide significant 'learns'. 27 is still fairly young in boxing terms these days and there's no indication of imminent physical decline on Barker's part. By contrast, I defy anyone to tell me that having a lengthy lay-off followed by one 12-rounder against a fighter well short of world-class is the perfect way for a fighter to peak.... I'm willing to bet even those closest to him would say that if he'd had another two/three bouts at fringe world-level he'd be sharper, more experienced and thus a better fighter i.e. at his peak in terms of hitting the perfect balance between physical development and experience.