if i'm a mug my prediction must have been lucky......improved fighter? a young rhodes would not have lost to lockett nor made matthew hatton look magic......the win over a weight-drained moore flattered him...wesley05 wrote:out of his depth get real you mug look what a better fighter he is under dave get a griplos2 wrote:coldwell out of his depth....los2 wrote:i think rhodes will stink this one out....he's been sparring curtis woodhouse...what type of preparation is that?
Rhodes-Canelo build up
Re: Rhodes-Canelo build up
Re: Rhodes-Canelo build up
Lol you seem obsessed with genitalia now please go back to your kennel and dont be rude this is a boxing discusion forum.SOUTHPAW wrote:I CAN TYPE HOW I WANT TO JUST LIKE U CAN SAY WANT U WANT....HOWEVER I FIND U A BIT OF A PRICK...HAVE U EVER BOXED...DONT TELL ME TO CHILL OUT WHEN A PRICK LIKE U COMES ON HERE AND TALKS SO MUCH BOLLOCKS...Jon Saxon wrote:listen uppercase boy chill out its only boxing, this is a forum and everyone has a say but typing in uppercase just looks...kinda 'Jeremy Kyle'ish'SOUTHPAW wrote: I WISH U WOULD SHUT UP........WASNT U ON HERE A FEW WEEKS AGO SLAGGING ANOTHER BOXER FROM SHEFFIELD OFF.....IF HIS ARSE HAD GONE LIKE U SAY HE COULD HAVE JUMPED ON THE FLOOR AT ANYTIME..BUT HE STOOD FIRM TOOK HIS LICKS UNTIL HE COULDNT TAKE THEM NO MORE....HE SIMPLY GOT BEAT BY A FUTURE SUPER STAR WHO ON THE NIGHT WAS PUNCH PERFECT....
I think the ginger gets his ass handed to him by a ragey speedster, he aint all that.
lets not get personal as its.....well...kinda cheap.
Re: Rhodes-Canelo build up
Hi Ian...Ian 'Mr' McNeilly wrote:Jon Saxon wrote:http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=5gNJsdRDQYwIan 'Mr' McNeilly wrote:There's quite a bit of sh1te being talked on the forums about Rhodes. Should expect it I suppose. A lot of numpties saying things like Rhodes simply went for the money; he was ignoring his corner; didn't even try, etc.
Just shows complete ignorance of how a match up like this plays out.![]()
Aye, great analogy! Castro threw even f*cking less than Rhodes and Jackson got sloppy, which Alvarez didn't. What a load of sh1te
Perhalps you didnt understand what I meant?
What i meant was that Castro got the worst beating I have ever saw but yet still in his HEART believed he could pull it off...and he did.
Ryan never had the belief in the first place.
That was my point.
-
Final round
- Cruiserweight
- Posts: 4911
- Joined: 20 Oct 2010, 17:02
Re: Rhodes-Canelo build up
He did go for it but was unable to do what he wanted to do due to Alvarez's dominance.Jon Saxon wrote:People want him to go for it and he didnt, thats the bottom line.Final round wrote:There's seems to be a complete lack of respect for Rhodes's performance on different boxing forums. It amazes me how fans of the sport can call his performance rubbish I think they'd rather someone go all out swinging with no thought behind it and then get knocked out.Ian 'Mr' McNeilly wrote:There's quite a bit of sh1te being talked on the forums about Rhodes. Should expect it I suppose. A lot of numpties saying things like Rhodes simply went for the money; he was ignoring his corner; didn't even try, etc.
Just shows complete ignorance of how a match up like this plays out.
at least Rhodes didn't get on his bicycle for 12 rounds, he did what he could but was beaten in all departments.
Would you rather he swung for the hills and got ktfo?
I could do that with no training
Re: Rhodes-Canelo build up
Final round wrote:He did go for it but was unable to do what he wanted to do due to Alvarez's dominance.Jon Saxon wrote:People want him to go for it and he didnt, thats the bottom line.Final round wrote: There's seems to be a complete lack of respect for Rhodes's performance on different boxing forums. It amazes me how fans of the sport can call his performance rubbish I think they'd rather someone go all out swinging with no thought behind it and then get knocked out.
at least Rhodes didn't get on his bicycle for 12 rounds, he did what he could but was beaten in all departments.
Would you rather he swung for the hills and got ktfo?
I could do that with no training
See above.
Re: Rhodes-Canelo build up
Just an annoying twat then?Jon Saxon wrote:Dan Dares wrote:Are you one of those annoying twats that constantly posts song lyrics on facebook?Jon Saxon wrote:"You better lose yourself in the music, the moment
You own it, you better never let it go
You only get one shot, do not miss your chance to blow
This opportunity comes once in a lifetime"
No I'm not.
Re: Rhodes-Canelo build up
Raw nerve wee baws?Dan Dares wrote:Just an annoying twat then?Jon Saxon wrote:Dan Dares wrote: Are you one of those annoying twats that constantly posts song lyrics on facebook?
No I'm not.
You sir are uncouth.
Last edited by Jon Saxon on 20 Jun 2011, 11:18, edited 1 time in total.
Re: Rhodes-Canelo build up
Gotcha. Looked like the stone-headed devil stumbled about and got lucky to me 8)Jon Saxon wrote:Hi Ian...Ian 'Mr' McNeilly wrote:Jon Saxon wrote: http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=5gNJsdRDQYw![]()
Aye, great analogy! Castro threw even f*cking less than Rhodes and Jackson got sloppy, which Alvarez didn't. What a load of sh1te
Perhalps you didnt understand what I meant?
What i meant was that Castro got the worst beating I have ever saw but yet still in his HEART believed he could pull it off...and he did.
Ryan never had the belief in the first place.
That was my point.
Re: Rhodes-Canelo build up
lets get back on track
Can't really say it any better than how Mickey put it really oh and Mickey you were BANG on about the card girls too.......
This sums it up for me, Alverez was class that night, simple as that. maybe he had a good day at the office and Ryan had a bad one i don't know, but the guy gave a master class.Rhodes was just outclassed by a wide margin. He didn't bottle it, he didn't run, he came forward, stayed in range, and took his lumps. He just wasn't good enough against a guy who looks like he might just be a special talent. No shame in that.
As an aside, anyone else think the ringcard/Corona girls were different class?
Can't really say it any better than how Mickey put it really oh and Mickey you were BANG on about the card girls too.......
Re: Rhodes-Canelo build up
WELL HAVE U EVER BOXED......PLEASE DONT TELL ME TO GO BACK TO MY KENNEL SUNSHINE.....CHEAP IS WHAT U ARE SAYING ABOUT WHAT HAPPENED...HE DIDNT BOTTLE IT LIKE U SAY...HE JUST GOT BEAT BY A VERY GOOD KIDJon Saxon wrote:Lol you seem obsessed with genitalia now please go back to your kennel and dont be rude this is a boxing discusion forum.SOUTHPAW wrote:I CAN TYPE HOW I WANT TO JUST LIKE U CAN SAY WANT U WANT....HOWEVER I FIND U A BIT OF A PRICK...HAVE U EVER BOXED...DONT TELL ME TO CHILL OUT WHEN A PRICK LIKE U COMES ON HERE AND TALKS SO MUCH BOLLOCKS...Jon Saxon wrote: listen uppercase boy chill out its only boxing, this is a forum and everyone has a say but typing in uppercase just looks...kinda 'Jeremy Kyle'ish'
I think the ginger gets his ass handed to him by a ragey speedster, he aint all that.
lets not get personal as its.....well...kinda cheap.
Re: Rhodes-Canelo build up
SOUTHPAW wrote:WELL HAVE U EVER BOXED......PLEASE DONT TELL ME TO GO BACK TO MY KENNEL SUNSHINE.....CHEAP IS WHAT U ARE SAYING ABOUT WHAT HAPPENED...HE DIDNT BOTTLE IT LIKE U SAY...HE JUST GOT BEAT BY A VERY GOOD KIDJon Saxon wrote:Lol you seem obsessed with genitalia now please go back to your kennel and dont be rude this is a boxing discusion forum.SOUTHPAW wrote: I CAN TYPE HOW I WANT TO JUST LIKE U CAN SAY WANT U WANT....HOWEVER I FIND U A BIT OF A PRICK...HAVE U EVER BOXED...DONT TELL ME TO CHILL OUT WHEN A PRICK LIKE U COMES ON HERE AND TALKS SO MUCH BOLLOCKS...
lets not get personal as its.....well...kinda cheap.
Your an angry man arent you? lol
what "happened" was that he never laid it on the line.
ALL the forums are saying that he put in a non effort so shut it wee sacks.
Im done with you.
Re: Rhodes-Canelo build up
I'll keep mine pleasant as i'm a...well, a pleasant kinda guy.Your an angry man arent you? lol
what "happened" was that he never laid it on the line.
ALL the forums are saying that he put in a non effort so shut it wee sacks.
Im done with you.
I honestly didn't see it that way at all, he never got the chance to get going mate, surely you could see that? Alvarez was bang on the money that night and as it turns out those body shots were hurting Ryan almost from the word go. Not sure if you have ever boxed but no matter how much you want to win or 'lay it on the line' as you say, sometimes it gets beaten out of you.
Also with the non effort comment, thats just silly really, he wouldn't have battled to the 12th round with lack of effort mate, certainly not with the punishment he was getting.
Just my opinion like, but i just don't agree with you on those points.
-
Final round
- Cruiserweight
- Posts: 4911
- Joined: 20 Oct 2010, 17:02
Re: Rhodes-Canelo build up
Crazyboy wrote:I'll keep mine pleasant as i'm a...well, a pleasant kinda guy.Your an angry man arent you? lol
what "happened" was that he never laid it on the line.
ALL the forums are saying that he put in a non effort so shut it wee sacks.
Im done with you.
I honestly didn't see it that way at all, he never got the chance to get going mate, surely you could see that? Alvarez was bang on the money that night and as it turns out those body shots were hurting Ryan almost from the word go. Not sure if you have ever boxed but no matter how much you want to win or 'lay it on the line' as you say, sometimes it gets beaten out of you.
Also with the non effort comment, thats just silly really, he wouldn't have battled to the 12th round with lack of effort mate, certainly not with the punishment he was getting.
Just my opinion like, but i just don't agree with you on those points.
You're wasting your time mate, Rhodes effort didn't meet his standards an thats that.
God forbid that he came up against someone who was better than him in all departments but he still pursued and tried to engage with no luck.
Re: Rhodes-Canelo build up
Who's this rangey speedster then? Alvarez ain't all that? You talking out of your arse, as usual. Did someone bum rape you in Sheffield?Jon Saxon wrote:I think the ginger gets his ass handed to him by a ragey speedster, he aint all that.
Re: Rhodes-Canelo build up
Wow the 'guardian of Sheffield' has returned with words of wisdom!Dan Dares wrote:Who's this rangey speedster then? Alvarez ain't all that? You talking out of your arse, as usual. Did someone bum rape you in Sheffield?Jon Saxon wrote:I think the ginger gets his ass handed to him by a ragey speedster, he aint all that.
To answer your question I believe that a come backing Paul Williams (and he's not even that fast)ices the ginger and what about Martinez? (who btw can still make LM)
However think about this...how many rounds do you think Ryan would have lasted with a peak Paul Williams? I'm guessing about as long as it takes for you to type your shitey biased Sheffield posts.
I like Ryan but he didn't lay it on the line AND ANY OF YOU PEOPLE WHO DISAGREE ON THIS FORUM ARE LYING TO YOURSELVES, face it, the boxing world at large (outside Sheffield:-) knows this and there are many posts & comments about it.
PS Oh yes.. in the words of the great Koysta Tyszu "please don't be rude" as it only shows your persona in a bad light.
Re: Rhodes-Canelo build up
So now you know.
-
Monte Fisto
- Cruiserweight
- Posts: 2978
- Joined: 23 Jan 2011, 15:36
Re: Rhodes-Canelo build up
great job by Saul, a potential banana skin and he walked it. I think we will all get a treat following his career.95gerog wrote:I think Alverez will become a great! However I believe Rhodes is gonna provide an upset tomorrow night.
Re: Rhodes-Canelo build up
I like reading your posts. They're usually highly opinionated and inflammatory. You like to have a ding-dong with Sir Ian, which makes for interesting reading on here. Sometimes you make some valid points. Difficult to find though, amongst all the vitriol, snide and drivel.Jon Saxon wrote:Wow the 'guardian of Sheffield' has returned with words of wisdom!Dan Dares wrote:Who's this rangey speedster then? Alvarez ain't all that? You talking out of your arse, as usual. Did someone bum rape you in Sheffield?Jon Saxon wrote:I think the ginger gets his ass handed to him by a ragey speedster, he aint all that.
To answer your question I believe that a come backing Paul Williams (and he's not even that fast)ices the ginger and what about Martinez? (who btw can still make LM)
However think about this...how many rounds do you think Ryan would have lasted with a peak Paul Williams? I'm guessing about as long as it takes for you to type your shitey biased Sheffield posts.
I like Ryan but he didn't lay it on the line AND ANY OF YOU PEOPLE WHO DISAGREE ON THIS FORUM ARE LYING TO YOURSELVES, face it, the boxing world at large (outside Sheffield:-) knows this and there are many posts & comments about it.
PS Oh yes.. in the words of the great Koysta Tyszu "please don't be rude" as it only shows your persona in a bad light.
I knew you were gonna respond with 'rangey speedsters' Martinez and Williams, very boring. And it's got no relevance how many rounds Rhodes would have gone with a 'prime' Paul Williams - if my aunt had bollocks she'd be my uncle. It's easy to slag off fighters that are not 'world class' as you call it. Your comment that Alvarez 'isn't all that' wasn't about Alvarez, it was about Rhodes. That's disrespectful and childish.
You obviously read a lot about boxing (a lot more than me anyway) but methinks you digest too many of the par-boiled opinions of boxing journalists and other forum posters, and spew them out on here in bad English. You are hackneyed, and like a regional version of Scot Gilifoid who posts on the awful black and yellow website that I bet you're all over.
'I don't think he gave it enough' would have done, rather than posting all the bullshit analogies and song lyrics to get your spiteful little points across. You should wash your words clean.
Sorry about the bum rape thing though.
-
wesley05
- Heavyweight

Re: Rhodes-Canelo build up
Sup prise sup prise mr "Jon Saxon" slaggin off the Sheffield boys again av had this argument with this muppet before
up most respect to Ryan for goin over there in that atmosphere what a boy still our champ ![[icon_notworthy.gif] :bow:](./images/smilies/icon_notworthy.gif)
Re: Rhodes-Canelo build up
Dan...I think I love you.Dan Dares wrote:I like reading your posts. They're usually highly opinionated and inflammatory. You like to have a ding-dong with Sir Ian, which makes for interesting reading on here. Sometimes you make some valid points. Difficult to find though, amongst all the vitriol, snide and drivel.Jon Saxon wrote:Wow the 'guardian of Sheffield' has returned with words of wisdom!Dan Dares wrote: Who's this rangey speedster then? Alvarez ain't all that? You talking out of your arse, as usual. Did someone bum rape you in Sheffield?
To answer your question I believe that a come backing Paul Williams (and he's not even that fast)ices the ginger and what about Martinez? (who btw can still make LM)
However think about this...how many rounds do you think Ryan would have lasted with a peak Paul Williams? I'm guessing about as long as it takes for you to type your shitey biased Sheffield posts.
I like Ryan but he didn't lay it on the line AND ANY OF YOU PEOPLE WHO DISAGREE ON THIS FORUM ARE LYING TO YOURSELVES, face it, the boxing world at large (outside Sheffield:-) knows this and there are many posts & comments about it.
PS Oh yes.. in the words of the great Koysta Tyszu "please don't be rude" as it only shows your persona in a bad light.
I knew you were gonna respond with 'rangey speedsters' Martinez and Williams, very boring. And it's got no relevance how many rounds Rhodes would have gone with a 'prime' Paul Williams - if my aunt had bollocks she'd be my uncle. It's easy to slag off fighters that are not 'world class' as you call it. Your comment that Alvarez 'isn't all that' wasn't about Alvarez, it was about Rhodes. That's disrespectful and childish.
You obviously read a lot about boxing (a lot more than me anyway) but methinks you digest too many of the par-boiled opinions of boxing journalists and other forum posters, and spew them out on here in bad English. You are hackneyed, and like a regional version of Scot Gilifoid who posts on the awful black and yellow website that I bet you're all over.
'I don't think he gave it enough' would have done, rather than posting all the bullshit analogies and song lyrics to get your spiteful little points across. You should wash your words clean.
Sorry about the bum rape thing though.
-
curtis wood
- Heavyweight

- Posts: 935
- Joined: 23 May 2010, 03:23
Re: Rhodes-Canelo build up
john saxon your talking total rubbish ryan trained for 12 solid weeks got himself in the best shape hes probably ever been in to then go to mexico and not try? come on mate it doesnt make sense he got beat by a top top fighter who was just a step ahead of ryan all night ryan gave it his best shot but wasnt good enough on the night thats sometimes the way it goes do you really think he didnt try? show him a bit more respect than you are doing im pretty sure over the last decade hes earned it ![[icon_shame.gif] :shame:](./images/smilies/icon_shame.gif)
Re: Rhodes-Canelo build up
Sorry mate but he never laid it on the line and i'm not the only one who thinks that, I sat up during the night and waited for Ryan to shick all those HBO & Mexican nobs who think that the gingers the dogs baws.curtis wood wrote:john saxon your talking total rubbish ryan trained for 12 solid weeks got himself in the best shape hes probably ever been in to then go to mexico and not try? come on mate it doesnt make sense he got beat by a top top fighter who was just a step ahead of ryan all night ryan gave it his best shot but wasnt good enough on the night thats sometimes the way it goes do you really think he didnt try? show him a bit more respect than you are doing im pretty sure over the last decade hes earned it
I really like Ryan both as a fighter and as a person and I would have loved for him to went out there like the old spice boy and lay it all on the line and punch the gingers kunt in.