BURNS V COOK
-
nelsoninfour
- Heavyweight

BURNS V COOK
Anyone agree that this is a 50/50 fight if so the bookies have burns at 1/5 on.
Dont all lump on it before i can get on it?
Dont all lump on it before i can get on it?
Re: BURNS V COOK
Cook has an excellent chance of pulling this off despite his inactivity and Burns' good form IMO.
I'll be having a few quid on Cook.
I'll be having a few quid on Cook.
-
billy nelson
- Heavyweight

- Posts: 1966
- Joined: 12 Apr 2010, 12:49
Re: BURNS V COOK
Dont throw your money away mate.Ben Carey wrote:Cook has an excellent chance of pulling this off despite his inactivity and Burns' good form IMO.
I'll be having a few quid on Cook.
-
jameswilson
- Heavyweight

- Posts: 13434
- Joined: 08 Jan 2004, 18:01
Re: BURNS V COOK
I think it is closer than many think, however this depends on whether Cook is close to the form he was in during his peak years. I remember being absolutely gutted when his fight with Scott Harrison fell through because I was convinced he was gonna beat Harrison.
-
nelsoninfour
- Heavyweight

Re: BURNS V COOK
Come on Billy all scots like a punt surely even you got to admit the bookies prices are a bit out.billy nelson wrote:Dont throw your money away mate.Ben Carey wrote:Cook has an excellent chance of pulling this off despite his inactivity and Burns' good form IMO.
I'll be having a few quid on Cook.
Think Ricky should be favourite but should be closer in the betting.
I probably think Ricky will win but as a gambler then Cook a good price.
Your doing a good job and success breeds success and long may it continue for you as you seem like a 24/7 lover of the game
Re: BURNS V COOK
Remember Cook beat Arthur to win the title and Burns isnt the strongest of world champions is he. I do think Burns is a good fighter, but Cook was some fighter before he got by Martinez and was one of the form British fighters.
Is his Dad training him for this fight? Why was he out of the ring for so long?
Is his Dad training him for this fight? Why was he out of the ring for so long?
-
boxingfarmer30
- Heavyweight

Re: BURNS V COOK
billy nelson wrote:Dont throw your money away mate.Ben Carey wrote:Cook has an excellent chance of pulling this off despite his inactivity and Burns' good form IMO.
I'll be having a few quid on Cook.
Re: BURNS V COOK
Scott Harrison would have obliterated cook. Cook boxed well against an empty shell of Alex Arthur and won a close decision. There's no way cook can cope with burns speed, workrate and variety. Burns by late stoppage.
Re: BURNS V COOK
I got to go for Burns based on activity. He has been the more active fighter and should win this by decision.
Re: BURNS V COOK
Poor match. Cook should have actually had to fight his way into the rankings. Burns inside 8
Re: BURNS V COOK
I don't like a cook who burns stuff.
Re: BURNS V COOK
Awful, shame on youcrusader wrote:I don't like a cook who burns stuff.
Re: BURNS V COOK
Nicky Cook inactive for 2 years, then fights Al-Hamidi and gets a world title shot. Gota love boxing.