Have sky replaced Khan with Froch?

Post Reply
rapid2
Heavyweight
Heavyweight
Posts: 93
Joined: 22 Jan 2010, 20:02

Have sky replaced Khan with Froch?

Post by rapid2 »

Sky always seem to be leaving someone out in the cold. :lol:
Josh1111
Cruiserweight
Posts: 874
Joined: 02 Sep 2010, 05:50

Re: Have sky replaced Khan with Froch?

Post by Josh1111 »

Khan has left himself out in the cold by getting greedy and wanting PPV for a crap fight. When sky pulled his last fight from PPV to normal sky, he spat his dummy out and went to primetime
Camcas
Cruiserweight
Posts: 881
Joined: 12 Sep 2010, 14:18

Re: Have sky replaced Khan with Froch?

Post by Camcas »

Much rather watch Froch than Khan so can't say im really bothered
deadpan
Heavyweight
Heavyweight
Posts: 3172
Joined: 22 Apr 2004, 04:46

Re: Have sky replaced Khan with Froch?

Post by deadpan »

Much rather listen to Froch than Khan as well.
stujones
Heavyweight
Heavyweight
Posts: 27513
Joined: 29 Aug 2003, 15:08

Re: Have sky replaced Khan with Froch?

Post by stujones »

Josh1111 wrote:Khan has left himself out in the cold by getting greedy and wanting PPV for a crap fight. When sky pulled his last fight from PPV to normal sky, he spat his dummy out and went to primetime
Naughty, Naughty Khan....... Sky signed the fight to be on Sky Box Office - they are the ones that baulked on a deal.
Josh1111
Cruiserweight
Posts: 874
Joined: 02 Sep 2010, 05:50

Re: Have sky replaced Khan with Froch?

Post by Josh1111 »

The Dark Destroyer wrote:
Josh1111 wrote:Khan has left himself out in the cold by getting greedy and wanting PPV for a crap fight. When sky pulled his last fight from PPV to normal sky, he spat his dummy out and went to primetime
I doubt he personally made that decision.
Yea i know that but its Khan's fault who he has in his team. Look at the shambles with Ariza, his team sack him but then Khan employs him again.
liamlion
Heavyweight
Heavyweight
Posts: 1956
Joined: 06 Jan 2005, 09:56

Re: Have sky replaced Khan with Froch?

Post by liamlion »

stujones wrote:
Josh1111 wrote:Khan has left himself out in the cold by getting greedy and wanting PPV for a crap fight. When sky pulled his last fight from PPV to normal sky, he spat his dummy out and went to primetime
Naughty, Naughty Khan....... Sky signed the fight to be on Sky Box Office - they are the ones that baulked on a deal.
Clearly however the agreement was made on the proviso that the undercard would be competitive and decent (e.g. a quality control clause). It became apparent in the week leading up to the fight that this wasnt going to be the case and Sky clearly activated the clause in the contract that saw the fight pulled from Box Office.

I note that Team Khan did not attempt to sue Sky for breach of contract - which clearly implies that in pulling the fight from Box Office, Sky hadnt done anything that wasnt permitted in the contract.

Sky exercised correct and proper judgment.
ThereByTheGrace
Cruiserweight
Posts: 4016
Joined: 04 Sep 2010, 05:22

Re: Have sky replaced Khan with Froch?

Post by ThereByTheGrace »

liamlion wrote:
stujones wrote:
Josh1111 wrote:Khan has left himself out in the cold by getting greedy and wanting PPV for a crap fight. When sky pulled his last fight from PPV to normal sky, he spat his dummy out and went to primetime
Naughty, Naughty Khan....... Sky signed the fight to be on Sky Box Office - they are the ones that baulked on a deal.
Clearly however the agreement was made on the proviso that the undercard would be competitive and decent (e.g. a quality control clause). It became apparent in the week leading up to the fight that this wasnt going to be the case and Sky clearly activated the clause in the contract that saw the fight pulled from Box Office.

I note that Team Khan did not attempt to sue Sky for breach of contract - which clearly implies that in pulling the fight from Box Office, Sky hadnt done anything that wasnt permitted in the contract.

Sky exercised correct and proper judgment.

Correct - its not like Sky - being happy NOT to take our money!! The set up for the "homecoming" was a farce from the outset - they didnt even have a main event when SBO announced PPV - obviously thought that Khan was fighting a bigger name than they ended up with.
Yes We Can
Cruiserweight
Posts: 2087
Joined: 29 Sep 2010, 17:16

Re: Have sky replaced Khan with Froch?

Post by Yes We Can »

Lets be honest, we pay for Sky so we are able to watch all of our top boxers. It shouldnt be one or the other, thats pointless and is an attitude that will continue to leave boxing as a minority sport.
mkirkhope
Cruiserweight
Posts: 231
Joined: 19 Sep 2010, 08:20

Re: Have sky replaced Khan with Froch?

Post by mkirkhope »

funtime wrote:Lets be honest, we pay for Sky so we are able to watch all of our top boxers. It shouldnt be one or the other, thats pointless and is an attitude that will continue to leave boxing as a minority sport.
Agree, but given the choice of seeing one with quality shows or having both but on terrible ppv bills like Khan's ended up as then I'd take the one.
whiskey
Heavyweight
Heavyweight
Posts: 11956
Joined: 27 Mar 2007, 14:52

Re: Have sky replaced Khan with Froch?

Post by whiskey »

funtime wrote:Lets be honest, we pay for Sky so we are able to watch all of our top boxers. It shouldnt be one or the other, thats pointless and is an attitude that will continue to leave boxing as a minority sport.
Yeah let's be honest,

The guy was hell bent on charging 'his loyal fans' £15.00 for the fight, even it meant dropping the marquee Sky platform in favour of a PPV channel to do so.

There's your attitude for it being in trouble funtime.
rhino222
Heavyweight
Heavyweight
Posts: 6618
Joined: 09 Sep 2005, 09:38

Re: Have sky replaced Khan with Froch?

Post by rhino222 »

liamlion wrote:
stujones wrote:
Josh1111 wrote:Khan has left himself out in the cold by getting greedy and wanting PPV for a crap fight. When sky pulled his last fight from PPV to normal sky, he spat his dummy out and went to primetime
Naughty, Naughty Khan....... Sky signed the fight to be on Sky Box Office - they are the ones that baulked on a deal.
Clearly however the agreement was made on the proviso that the undercard would be competitive and decent (e.g. a quality control clause). It became apparent in the week leading up to the fight that this wasnt going to be the case and Sky clearly activated the clause in the contract that saw the fight pulled from Box Office.

I note that Team Khan did not attempt to sue Sky for breach of contract - which clearly implies that in pulling the fight from Box Office, Sky hadnt done anything that wasnt permitted in the contract.

Sky exercised correct and proper judgment.
for the good and benefit of us lot i might add!!!
Post Reply