Corbett and Tyson: Much in Common?

BoxBuzz · Post by **BoxBuzz** » 01 Jul 2011, 22:39

jaclem2 wrote:...all of you missed the most obvious similarity between tyson and corbett....their striking physical resemblance ....

I don't know....seems to me that Tyson physically strikes with far more authority than Jim. Not much resemblance in how they physically strike IMHO.

jaclem2 · Post by **jaclem2** » 02 Jul 2011, 02:20

...buzz...i wonder how many knuckle draggers here are pondering your post and missing your playing with the language and some even agreeing that yes, tyson did hit harder than corbett..

kal.majeed · Post by **kal.majeed** » 03 Jul 2011, 15:08

For those interested or intrigued (note the Klitschko-Haye post and UPDATE) by historical data combined with numerology, here are some details about the upcoming (expected) bouts – Mayweather Jr. vs. Ortiz and Pacquiao vs. Marquez III. By the way, the other Klitschko (Vitali) is expected to win over Tomasz Adamek aka “Goral” [5 letters – identical to “David”] just as his younger brother counterpart (comparable type of details as Klitschko-Haye).

Jimmy McLarnin is a near identical match to Manny Pacquiao – the letter number total [13 letters] and similar type first names. Not to mention, they both rise from flyweight to welterweight (and above) with great success. Also, their birthdates are only two days apart – Jimmy (December 19th) and Manny (December 17th).

Jimmy [5 letters] has a trilogy with a boxer (without a stoppage loss) named Barney Ross [10 letters] – all three bouts end with controversial decisions.

Manny [5 letters] has a trilogy with a boxer (without a stoppage loss) named Juan Manuel [10 letters] – all three bouts end with controversial decisions (???).

Henry Armstrong – birth name Henry Melody Jackson [18 letters] and Floyd Mayweather Jr. – birth name Floyd Joy Mayweather [18 letters] also share a great deal of history and numerology data in common. They both rise from around featherweight to around middleweight – with a great deal of success. Also, Henry [5 letters] is born in the state of Missouri [8 letters] and Floyd [5 letters] is born in the state of Michigan [8 letters]. In addition, Henry [5 letters] dies in a matching year and decade (1988) and Floyd [5 letters] is born in a matching year and decade (1977).

In 1941, Henry [5 letters] challenges a boxer named Zivic [5 letters] for the world WW title but loses via a cut stoppage in the 12th round.

Seventy years later (2011), Floyd [5 letters] challenges a boxer named Ortiz [5 letters] for a world WW title but loses via a cut stoppage in the 12th round (???).

Note: The great Jimmy (Manny’s historic and number counterpart) is never matched with the great Henry (Floyd’s historic and number counterpart). Also, the history and numerology trend as depicted for the Klitschko-Haye match is by far more reliable but I just wanted to do something a little different (plus, I’m quite busy – much work to do)…

P.S.

Needless to say, this is assuming that these matches all materialize (as scheduled); do not be surprised if there are reschedules, cancellations or “behind-the-scenes” arrangements…

Giancarlo · Post by **Giancarlo** » 03 Jul 2011, 17:26

You seem to pick first names, last names, nicknames etc to suit whatever it is you are trying to "prove".

kal.majeed · Post by **kal.majeed** » 03 Jul 2011, 17:47

Giancarlo wrote:You seem to pick first names, last names, nicknames etc to suit whatever it is you are trying to "prove".

Hello again. Although it may appear as such, it is actually FAR more complex than that - I guess I should have first referenced something I learned in school (one of the few times I paid attention).

http://www.google.com/#sclient=psy&hl=e ... 62&bih=651

I’m not really trying to “prove” anything (I have saved those details for my book) – just trying (for those interested) to educate/entertain…

Giancarlo · Post by **Giancarlo** » 03 Jul 2011, 18:05

kal.majeed wrote:
Giancarlo wrote:You seem to pick first names, last names, nicknames etc to suit whatever it is you are trying to "prove".
Hello again. Although it may appear as such, it is actually FAR more complex than that - I guess I should have first referenced something I learned in school (one of the few times I paid attention).

http://www.google.com/#sclient=psy&hl=e ... 62&bih=651

I’m not really trying to “prove” anything (I have saved those details for my book) – just trying (for those interested) to educate/entertain…

Remind me, what is the book about?

kal.majeed · Post by **kal.majeed** » 03 Jul 2011, 18:25

Click on my name link and check out my profile - all the (vital) details are there....

Giancarlo · Post by **Giancarlo** » 03 Jul 2011, 20:32

kal.majeed wrote:Click on my name link and check out my profile - all the (vital) details are there....

"An insider speaks"

What are you an "insider" to?

kal.majeed · Post by **kal.majeed** » 03 Jul 2011, 21:00

Giancarlo wrote:
kal.majeed wrote:Click on my name link and check out my profile - all the (vital) details are there....

"An insider speaks"

What are you an "insider" to?

Do I really have to answer that - can't you tell??? LOL!?!?

Try me - I don't know what you are interested in or I would offer up some evidence (but feel free to test me - keep it clean)...

Giancarlo · Post by **Giancarlo** » 04 Jul 2011, 00:13

kal.majeed wrote:
Giancarlo wrote:
kal.majeed wrote:Click on my name link and check out my profile - all the (vital) details are there....

"An insider speaks"

What are you an "insider" to?
Do I really have to answer that - can't you tell??? LOL!?!?

Try me - I don't know what you are interested in or I would offer up some evidence (but feel free to test me - keep it clean)...

This is a boxing forum, of sorts.

So, I'd have to think you are claiming some inside knowledge of boxing.

If so, it's not coming through in your posts.

jaclem2 · Post by **jaclem2** » 04 Jul 2011, 01:23

..majeed....just checked your profile....boojie boojie boojie...

kal.majeed · Post by **kal.majeed** » 04 Jul 2011, 07:10

To Giancarlo: Anything (in general) - check out the 'interests' section (and include geopolitical topics as well)....

To jaclem2: It may appear as such but if it were true, I would not be on this blog, now would I?? Remember, I have a book to promote...

jaclem2 · Post by **jaclem2** » 05 Jul 2011, 01:27

..i can hardly wait for fall...is there a publication date?

jaclem2 · Post by **jaclem2** » 05 Jul 2011, 01:32

...uh..what may be what if what were true? just askin....

kal.majeed · Post by **kal.majeed** » 05 Jul 2011, 08:45

To Giancarlo: Hope I didn’t scare you away – I guess you are not much of a ‘conspiracy theorist’ (lol). That’s fine – if you are interested (but did not want to ask about) the most popular conspiracy ‘topics’ – UFOs, JFK assassination and the Apollo 11 Moon landing – well, all the (vital) details are in the book (so, you don’t have to ask, for I will not be able to tell you – until its published). If it’s about boxer/sports fantasy match-ups, I’ve given some insight into that on my other post “Secret to Fantasy Boxer Match-ups Revealed”.

To jaclem2: No offense taken – perception does not always equal reality. Now, as far as an actual “publication date”, there may be some problems with that. As previously mentioned, the book is about far more than just boxing and primarily is a scientific, philosophical, historical and metaphysical analysis and account of the Universe (its origin and current ‘state’).

It exposes the vast incompetence, deceptions and outright lies within scientific, philosophical and cultural data – as it pertains to the Universe (in general). Now, I’m sure you are sensible enough to see that this can be perceived as an ‘attack’ by those communities (in general) and the great many problems and consequences that may result. The publisher has been concerned about the potential ‘trouble’ and I believe (once they see all the data) may option out their support.

There is an old eastern saying, “When the student is ready, the teacher (or master) will appear”.

I believe, “When the book is ready (and I have quite a bit more work to do) the publisher (with full support) will appear”.

P.S.

By the way, if you (or anyone else) know of such a publisher, feel free to contact me via “PM”.

kal.majeed · Post by **kal.majeed** » 05 Jul 2011, 11:41

Now for a comparison that may be too obvious to notice - Carlos Monzon [6 letters in each name – 12 total] and Marvin Hagler [6 letters in each name – 12 total].

They are both Hall-of-Fame ex-middleweight world champions born in the western hemisphere – want more (read on)…

Monzon [6 letters] is born in the nation of Argentina [9 letters] – Hagler [6 letters] is born in the state of New Jersey [9 letters].

Monzon [6 letters] fights virtually his entire career (1963-77) as a middleweight - Hagler [6 letters] fights virtually his entire career (1973-87) as a middleweight.

Both Monzon [6 letters] and Hagler [6 letters] have only three career defeats (avenging two of the three by kayo) and each amass over fifty kayo wins (without a kayo by loss).

Monzon [6 letters] becomes the South American middleweight champion in 1967 by defeating a boxer with the alias “Gallego” [7 letters] – Hagler [6 letters] becomes the North American middleweight champion in 1977 by defeating a boxer with the alias “The Worm” [7 letters].

In 1969, Monzon [6 letters] has a draw with a boxer (first and middle) named Carlos Alberto that Monzon later avenges via kayo – in 1979, Hagler [6 letters] has a draw with a boxer (first and middle) similar sounding named Vito Gabrielo that Hagler later avenges via kayo.

In 1970, Monzon [6 letters] becomes world middleweight champion by stopping a defending champion (and former European middleweight champion) named Nino [4 letters] with the bout referee named Rudolf [6 letters] - in 1980, Hagler [6 letters] becomes world middleweight champion by stopping a defending champion (and former European middleweight champion) named Alan [4 letters] with the bout referee named Carlos [6 letters].

Monzon [6 letters] has three successful world middleweight title defenses (via stoppages) in 1971 – Hagler [6 letters] has three successful world middleweight title defenses (via stoppages) in 1981.

Both Monzon [6 letters] and Hagler [6 letters] have successful title defenses over two welterweight champions – one from Latin America (Napoles for Monzon; Duran for Hagler) and one from the U.S. (Griffith for Monzon; Hearns for Hagler). Napoles is a 2-time world welterweight champion, Griffith (from the U.S Virgin Islands) is a 2-time world middleweight champion, Duran is a future world middleweight champion and Hearns is a future world middleweight and 2-time world light-heavyweight champion.

Monzon [6 letters] is the first to stop top contender Tony Licata [10 letters] with the bout referee named Tony Perez [9 letters] – Hagler [6 letters] is the first to stop top contender John Mugabi [10 letters] with the bout referee named Mills Lane [9 letters].

Monzon [6 letters] announces his retirement after a close and controversial decision of a 1977 world middleweight title defense (never to fight again) – Hagler [6 letters] announces his retirement after a close and controversial decision of a 1987 world middleweight title defense (never to fight again).

Monzon [6 letters] had reigned as world middleweight champion for seven consecutive years (1970-77) – Hagler [6 letters] had reigned as world middleweight champion for seven consecutive years (1980-87).

Monzon [6 letters] and Hagler [6 letters] both acted in Italian films.

BoxBuzz · Post by **BoxBuzz** » 05 Jul 2011, 15:11

yep (3 letters) okee dokee 3X3 Letters.

BoxBuzz · Post by **BoxBuzz** » 05 Jul 2011, 21:24

Mysteriously, a genuine anagram of Corbett-Tyson is "best not to cry"

This remarkably stupefying fact happens to be precisely as flabbergasting as it is unexplainable.

kal.majeed · Post by **kal.majeed** » 05 Jul 2011, 21:39

To readers: If you didn’t like the rest, maybe you’ll like this one…

Muhammad Ali – birth name Cassius Clay [11 letters] and Lennox Lewis [11 letters].

Both Ali and Lewis are born in nations that are ‘United’ (States for Ali and Kingdom for Lewis).

To maintain simplicity and to avoid repetition the names “Ali” and “Lewis” will be used to represent the aforementioned full names and letter numbers.

Ali [1960 Olympic gold medalist] in Italy [5 letters] – Lewis [1988 Olympic gold medalist] in Korea [5 letters].

Ali is the first to defeat and stop a challenger named Daniels from New York [7 letters] in a bout with a referee named Conn [4 letters] – Lewis is the first to defeat and stop a challenger named Mason from Jamaica [7 letters] in a bout with a referee named Vann [4 letters].

Ali becomes a top contender by stopping (on cuts) a British/European champion named Cooper [6 letters] in a bout with a referee named Tommy [5 letters] – Lewis becomes a top contender by stopping (on cuts) a French/European champion named Chanet [6 letters] in a bout with a referee named Franz [5 letters].

Ali becomes world heavyweight champion by defeating a boxer named Liston [6 letters] – Lewis officially becomes world heavyweight champion by defeating a boxer named Tucker [6 letters].

Ali has a successful title defense against a former world heavyweight champion named Floyd Patterson [14 letters] – Lewis has a successful title defense against a former world heavyweight champion named Henry Akinwande [14 letters].

Ali’s first loss is to a boxer known as “Smokin” [6 letters] – Lewis’ first loss is to a boxer known as “Atomic” [6 letters].

Ali’s second loss is to a boxer with the last name Norton [6 letters] – Lewis’ second loss is to a boxer with the last name Rahman [6 letters].

Both Ali and Lewis avenge their first/only two losses – and neither victor (Smokin, Norton or Atomic, Rahman) ever face each other.

Both Ali and Lewis become 3-time world heavyweight champions.

BoxBuzz · Post by **BoxBuzz** » 05 Jul 2011, 23:17

Continuing on in the same vein......Is it possible these icons are one and the same?

They have NEVER been seen at the same place at the same time!

Brett Paul Dunbar · Post by **Brett Paul Dunbar** » 06 Jul 2011, 01:02

kal.majeed wrote:To Giancarlo: Hope I didn’t scare you away – I guess you are not much of a ‘conspiracy theorist’ (lol). That’s fine – if you are interested (but did not want to ask about) the most popular conspiracy ‘topics’ – UFOs, JFK assassination and the Apollo 11 Moon landing – well, all the (vital) details are in the book (so, you don’t have to ask, for I will not be able to tell you – until its published). If it’s about boxer/sports fantasy match-ups, I’ve given some insight into that on my other post “Secret to Fantasy Boxer Match-ups Revealed”.

Oh right you're a loon.

UFOs: various explanations for different incidents, none are convincingly inexplicable. Not all are explained as the reports don't include enough data to distinguish between the various possibilities.

JFK: Shot by Lee Harvey Oswald, bullet 2 can essentially only have been fired from the window at which Oswald was standing. An obsessive acting alone is quite hard to stop as they can strike out of the blue and no one has any inkling of what they plan.

Apollo 11: Nasa built a huge rocket and used it to transport people to the moon. One Apollo experiment is ongoing; using a mirror placed on the moon and a laser to measure lunar recession. If you feel so inclined you can even perform your own observations.

Numerology (what you are doing) is looking through sets of figures looking for coincidences and finding them at about the rate would expect from chance. In order to have credibility you must construct a falsifiable model and test it. e.g. predict a significant number of fights and see whether you can do better than chance.

jaclem2 · Post by **jaclem2** » 06 Jul 2011, 02:16

..majeed and coocoo have the same number of letters. coincidence? perhaps not.

Giancarlo · Post by **Giancarlo** » 06 Jul 2011, 03:11

Brett Paul Dunbar wrote:
kal.majeed wrote:To Giancarlo: Hope I didn’t scare you away – I guess you are not much of a ‘conspiracy theorist’ (lol). That’s fine – if you are interested (but did not want to ask about) the most popular conspiracy ‘topics’ – UFOs, JFK assassination and the Apollo 11 Moon landing – well, all the (vital) details are in the book (so, you don’t have to ask, for I will not be able to tell you – until its published). If it’s about boxer/sports fantasy match-ups, I’ve given some insight into that on my other post “Secret to Fantasy Boxer Match-ups Revealed”.
Oh right you're a loon.

Yep, a 100% bona fide.

He'll fit in well with the other patients here.

kal.majeed · Post by **kal.majeed** » 06 Jul 2011, 07:04

Guys, you are completely misunderstanding what I'm saying - I referenced the 'conspiracy' topics as GENERAL references - I did not say anything specific - just that many people are interested in those topics (and they will be clarified in the book).

I did not say that aliens and UFOs exist or anything about Lee Harvey Oswald or anything specific about NASA - again, just general references.

Why would I make such claims - without proof - when I'm trying to promote a book - come on, now?!?

As I previously stated, the numerology data are for entertainment purposes only - never said I was Nostradamus...

BoxBuzz · Post by **BoxBuzz** » 06 Jul 2011, 08:08

At least I have offered proof in the case of Duran=Haggard.

Corbett and Tyson: Much in Common?

Re: Corbett and Tyson: Much in Common?

Re: Corbett and Tyson: Much in Common?

Re: Corbett and Tyson: Much in Common?

Re: Corbett and Tyson: Much in Common?

Re: Corbett and Tyson: Much in Common?

Re: Corbett and Tyson: Much in Common?

Re: Corbett and Tyson: Much in Common?

Re: Corbett and Tyson: Much in Common?

Re: Corbett and Tyson: Much in Common?

Re: Corbett and Tyson: Much in Common?

Re: Corbett and Tyson: Much in Common?

Re: Corbett and Tyson: Much in Common?

Re: Corbett and Tyson: Much in Common?

Re: Corbett and Tyson: Much in Common?

Re: Corbett and Tyson: Much in Common?

Re: Corbett and Tyson: Much in Common?

Re: Corbett and Tyson: Much in Common?

Re: Corbett and Tyson: Much in Common?

Re: Corbett and Tyson: Much in Common?

Re: Corbett and Tyson: Much in Common?

Re: Corbett and Tyson: Much in Common?

Re: Corbett and Tyson: Much in Common?

Re: Corbett and Tyson: Much in Common?

Re: Corbett and Tyson: Much in Common?

Re: Corbett and Tyson: Much in Common?