Jim Watt - how did he fair ?

ThereByTheGrace
Cruiserweight
Posts: 4016
Joined: 04 Sep 2010, 05:22

Re: Jim Watt - how did he fair ?

Post by ThereByTheGrace »

Jim Watt is the most honest pundit Sky have - thats why he is on commentary.

I thought he was toe-riffic.
alexpaterson
Heavyweight
Heavyweight
Posts: 4310
Joined: 22 Feb 2009, 11:22

Re: Jim Watt - how did he fair ?

Post by alexpaterson »

ThereByTheGrace wrote:Jim Watt is the most honest pundit Sky have - thats why he is on commentary.

I thought he was toe-riffic.
Toe-tally agree
mkirkhope
Cruiserweight
Posts: 231
Joined: 19 Sep 2010, 08:20

Re: Jim Watt - how did he fair ?

Post by mkirkhope »

G0mez wrote:I think analysing/reading is a fight skill he posseses - but as the main rep for Sky's commentary he always sours the occaision with his totally glass half empty approach for me.

For the most part he moans about technical mistakes, rather than give due credit for the other guy having success. If something happens 9/10 times he will pour scorn on those making an error rather than congratulate the one taking full advantage of it. And that colours the action a lot.

He never seems happy behind a mic, like the grumpy old neighbour who you dread to knock on his door when your ball goes over his fence.

Like was said previously, all the casual fans watching Saturday were lead to believe they'd witnessed the worst attempt at a fight in the history of boxing. Whilst Haye's mouth did him no favours in defeat, the fight commentary did him zero favours !
The overall commentary did him lots of favours - If you listened to Rawling with your eyes closed you would think Haye pushed Wlad all the way. And that's why I like Watt. He calls it like it is instead of doing the usual Sky hype job. Even casual fans aren't stupid. My mates watching in the pub who don't see a lot of boxing could tell that fight was a very poor damp squib without being able to hear Jim Watt tell them that.

Long live the Watt!
Datsue
Heavyweight
Heavyweight

Re: Jim Watt - how did he fair ?

Post by Datsue »

Grilling Machine wrote:Crankcase. He's not sitting down on his wheeeeels!

Rawling was watching an exciting fight. I guess he transforms into a DVD player.

I cannot believe that you just made a G1 Transformers reference in a Jim Watt thread, & that I got that reference without having to resort to Wikipedia.

I have wasted my life.
black panther
Heavyweight
Heavyweight
Posts: 4097
Joined: 11 Dec 2003, 07:06

Re: Jim Watt - how did he fair ?

Post by black panther »

bengulnaci1 wrote:Jim Watt is class, he called the tactics required to be Wlad from the off and was bang on during the fight.

'I believed Wladimir, I didn't believe Haye...' some weeks before the fight was genius.

Honestly, he might be dour, negative and all that, but he is best, most unbiased commentator we have ever had.

Sometimes he gets it wrong, but he is, for the majority, bang on :TU:

He gets a lot of unwarranted stick on these boards.

x2 I've always thought Watt was/is an excellent commentator.
bruthead
Heavyweight
Heavyweight
Posts: 280
Joined: 03 Jan 2010, 07:30

Re: Jim Watt - how did he fair ?

Post by bruthead »

ThereByTheGrace wrote:Jim Watt is the most honest pundit Sky have - thats why he is on commentary.
Watt is a class act. We need to hear less of Johnny Nelson and Adam Smith telling people what they want to hear and more of Jim Watt telling it like it is.

Watt is negative when he has reason to be negative. He loves watching Mayweather and Manny.
Post Reply