Holyfield in boxing news...

Post Reply
Jon Saxon
Heavyweight
Heavyweight
Posts: 1657
Joined: 22 Feb 2009, 16:16

Holyfield in boxing news...

Post by Jon Saxon »

got it spot on regarding the Haye fight.

He was right, Wlad won but there wasn't much in it really, one wouldn't and the other couldn't.
Last edited by Jon Saxon on 07 Jul 2011, 10:56, edited 1 time in total.
Bricks
Heavyweight
Heavyweight
Posts: 3916
Joined: 28 Apr 2008, 12:42

Re: Holyfield in boxing news...

Post by Bricks »

It's spelt "won" not "one".
Jon Saxon
Heavyweight
Heavyweight
Posts: 1657
Joined: 22 Feb 2009, 16:16

Re: Holyfield in boxing news...

Post by Jon Saxon »

mugabi wrote:It's spelt "won" not "one".

You got a speling fetish?, I don't give a fuk how it's spelt as long as you understand.


Dickhead.
Bricks
Heavyweight
Heavyweight
Posts: 3916
Joined: 28 Apr 2008, 12:42

Re: Holyfield in boxing news...

Post by Bricks »

Jon Saxon wrote:
mugabi wrote:It's spelt "won" not "one".

You got a speling fetish?, I don't give a fuk how it's spelt as long as you understand.


Dickhead.
hahahhaha "speling" fetish.....we need to clamp down on this sort of idiot lowering the tone here...
Jon Saxon
Heavyweight
Heavyweight
Posts: 1657
Joined: 22 Feb 2009, 16:16

Re: Holyfield in boxing news...

Post by Jon Saxon »

mugabi wrote:
Jon Saxon wrote:
mugabi wrote:It's spelt "won" not "one".

You got a speling fetish?, I don't give a fuk how it's spelt as long as you understand.


Dickhead.
hahahhaha "speling" fetish.....we need to clamp down on this sort of idiot lowering the tone here...

That was the point dolt, sarcasm aint your best point is it? (notice how i dont use "lol" or "hahahaha")
Post Reply