Evander Holyfield
-
THE MESSIAH
- Cruiserweight
- Posts: 306
- Joined: 23 Dec 2010, 16:55
Evander Holyfield
SKILL WISE.
Watc a prime holyfield, he had everything a fighter could want, slightly leaky defence but granite chin and punches in bunches, 8 punch cominations and fight all 12/15 rounds at pace.
Is he the best pure boxer at heavyweight ever?
If not who?
Watc a prime holyfield, he had everything a fighter could want, slightly leaky defence but granite chin and punches in bunches, 8 punch cominations and fight all 12/15 rounds at pace.
Is he the best pure boxer at heavyweight ever?
If not who?
-
keithmoonhangover
- Cruiserweight
- Posts: 16872
- Joined: 16 Sep 2010, 10:42
Re: HOLYFIELD HAS THERE EVER BEEN A BETTER HEAVYWEIGHT
Better natural boxers. Louis, Ali, Holmes.
Re: HOLYFIELD HAS THERE EVER BEEN A BETTER HEAVYWEIGHT
I loved watching Holyfield when I was younger. 'Evan Fields' has left many questions though...
Re: HOLYFIELD HAS THERE EVER BEEN A BETTER HEAVYWEIGHT
This topic should be moved over to Boxers Of The Past.
And the answer is: No.
And the answer is: No.
-
THE MESSIAH
- Cruiserweight
- Posts: 306
- Joined: 23 Dec 2010, 16:55
Re: HOLYFIELD HAS THERE EVER BEEN A BETTER HEAVYWEIGHT
Holyfiels is a current boxer.Crease wrote:This topic should be moved over to Boxers Of The Past.
And the answer is: No.
Re: HOLYFIELD HAS THERE EVER BEEN A BETTER HEAVYWEIGHT
Although I haven't seen a lot of them myself from what I've read Ezzard Charles and Gene Tunney were very skilled fighters.
Re: HOLYFIELD HAS THERE EVER BEEN A BETTER HEAVYWEIGHT
I rate Holyfield as quite possibly the best ever.
Sure he would have lost to some of the other greats ...but i think he would have beaten more of them than any other champion.
He could - and would - stand on the toes of the biggest and baddest heavies.
Sure he would have lost to some of the other greats ...but i think he would have beaten more of them than any other champion.
He could - and would - stand on the toes of the biggest and baddest heavies.
Re: HOLYFIELD HAS THERE EVER BEEN A BETTER HEAVYWEIGHT
Ezzard Charles was indeed very special ....shame he never had the oppurtunity to show his stuff while campaigning in his natural weight class.Matt W wrote:Although I haven't seen a lot of them myself from what I've read Ezzard Charles and Gene Tunney were very skilled fighters.
Not too sure on Tunney ..
Re: HOLYFIELD HAS THERE EVER BEEN A BETTER HEAVYWEIGHT
ali,holmes,frazier,foreman,louis,johnson,tyson,lewis,bowe(evidently)marciano,haye,toney
but if you add the roids he is level with most
but if you add the roids he is level with most
Re: HOLYFIELD HAS THERE EVER BEEN A BETTER HEAVYWEIGHT
cant get more skilled than Ali surely
i loved holyfield though back in the day , balls of steel
i loved holyfield though back in the day , balls of steel
Re: HOLYFIELD HAS THERE EVER BEEN A BETTER HEAVYWEIGHT
The best cruiserweight without question. He's a top 10 all-time heavyweight, but by no means the most skilled.
-
Bob & Weave
- Heavyweight

- Posts: 149
- Joined: 15 Nov 2009, 16:53
Re: HOLYFIELD HAS THERE EVER BEEN A BETTER HEAVYWEIGHT
"has there ever been a better heavyweight" - Yes
"Best skilled heavy ever - is he?" - No!
"Best skilled heavy ever - is he?" - No!
Re: HOLYFIELD HAS THERE EVER BEEN A BETTER HEAVYWEIGHT
this man is a quality poster lets keep him in british and irish, botp is the asshole of the body that is boxrec due to the dubious quality of posters u get there.Crease wrote:This topic should be moved over to Boxers Of The Past.
And the answer is: No.
Back to topic, yep holyfield had ferocious 15 round stamina, speed and combos, footwork, chin and heart, a incredible self beleif, but apart from his defence his power was also sporadic....early on he couldnt floor a top hw for love or money, later on he floored tyson,bowe,mercer and moorer and made lewis very wary of his power....
I do think mk 2 foreman had more of the total package as well as obviously ali, frazier,liston and holmes.....
Mk 2 foreman had incredible power and stamina, his defence was unorthodox and solid, heart and the same incredible will to win. Speed was a weakness but boy could he put his punches in bunches.....
Re: HOLYFIELD HAS THERE EVER BEEN A BETTER HEAVYWEIGHT
Best all rounder, had it all.
Not even worth talking about in fact.
No one had his skill set.
I would love for someone to try though.
Not even worth talking about in fact.
No one had his skill set.
I would love for someone to try though.
-
THE MESSIAH
- Cruiserweight
- Posts: 306
- Joined: 23 Dec 2010, 16:55
Re: HOLYFIELD HAS THERE EVER BEEN A BETTER HEAVYWEIGHT
Jon Saxon wrote:Best all rounder, had it all.
Not even worth talking about in fact.
No one had his skill set.
I would love for someone to try though.
-
Londonirish
- Heavyweight

- Posts: 3064
- Joined: 20 Nov 2008, 13:02
Re: HOLYFIELD HAS THERE EVER BEEN A BETTER HEAVYWEIGHT
THE MESSIAH wrote:Holyfiels is a current boxer.Crease wrote:This topic should be moved over to Boxers Of The Past.
And the answer is: No.
Spot on Messiah
-
THE MESSIAH
- Cruiserweight
- Posts: 306
- Joined: 23 Dec 2010, 16:55
Re: HOLYFIELD HAS THERE EVER BEEN A BETTER HEAVYWEIGHT
HAYE? Foreman? Frazier? Tyson?hurlock wrote:ali,holmes,frazier,foreman,louis,johnson,tyson,lewis,bowe(evidently)marciano,haye,toney
but if you add the roids he is level with most
The question is skill set. YOu honestly think HAYE has better skills than Holyfield?
Re: HOLYFIELD HAS THERE EVER BEEN A BETTER HEAVYWEIGHT
keithmoonhangover wrote:Better natural boxers. Louis, Ali, Holmes.
NO.
Louis was chinny and slow of foot,
Ali did not have an all round skill set no body punching etc etc..
Holmes slow of foot could not throw a hook of the jab.
C'mon any of you experts BRING IT!
-
keithmoonhangover
- Cruiserweight
- Posts: 16872
- Joined: 16 Sep 2010, 10:42
Re: HOLYFIELD HAS THERE EVER BEEN A BETTER HEAVYWEIGHT
I would counter by saying that Holyfield wasn't as accurate as Ali, Louis and Holmes.Jon Saxon wrote:keithmoonhangover wrote:Better natural boxers. Louis, Ali, Holmes.
NO.
Louis was chinny and slow of foot,
Ali did not have an all round skill set no body punching etc etc..
Holmes slow of foot could not throw a hook of the jab.
C'mon any of you experts BRING IT!
He also didn't have as good a jab as them.
He also had a lot less power than Louis.
-
THE MESSIAH
- Cruiserweight
- Posts: 306
- Joined: 23 Dec 2010, 16:55
Re: HOLYFIELD HAS THERE EVER BEEN A BETTER HEAVYWEIGHT
Londonirish wrote:THE MESSIAH wrote:Holyfiels is a current boxer.Crease wrote:This topic should be moved over to Boxers Of The Past.
And the answer is: No.
Spot on Messiah
Re: HOLYFIELD HAS THERE EVER BEEN A BETTER HEAVYWEIGHT
hurlock wrote:ali,holmes,frazier,foreman,louis,johnson,tyson,lewis,bowe(evidently)marciano,haye,toney
but if you add the roids he is level with most
Where do I start?
Ali? no body punching
Marciano...jeez
Holmes: slow afoot not hood of the jab
Foreman? = mummy
Hold on... are we talking skill set here? if so then Im not even going to bother pointing out anything more because its not even open to debate.
Re: HOLYFIELD HAS THERE EVER BEEN A BETTER HEAVYWEIGHT
Gazmac81 wrote:cant get more skilled than Ali surely
i loved holyfield though back in the day , balls of steel
Ali did not have a good body punching skills of even a great inside game, (other than pulling peoples heads down which was very good)so no mate Holyfield is the beter all rounder.
-
THE MESSIAH
- Cruiserweight
- Posts: 306
- Joined: 23 Dec 2010, 16:55
Re: HOLYFIELD HAS THERE EVER BEEN A BETTER HEAVYWEIGHT
PRIME HOLYFIELD.
THE MOST SKILLED HEAVYWEIGHT OF ALL TIME.
THE MOST SKILLED HEAVYWEIGHT OF ALL TIME.
-
keithmoonhangover
- Cruiserweight
- Posts: 16872
- Joined: 16 Sep 2010, 10:42
Re: HOLYFIELD HAS THERE EVER BEEN A BETTER HEAVYWEIGHT
Where was Holyfield's inside fighting against Riddick Bowe?Jon Saxon wrote:Gazmac81 wrote:cant get more skilled than Ali surely
i loved holyfield though back in the day , balls of steel
Ali did not have a good body punching skills of even a great inside game, (other than pulling peoples heads down which was very good)so no mate Holyfield is the beter all rounder.
Re: HOLYFIELD HAS THERE EVER BEEN A BETTER HEAVYWEIGHT
keithmoonhangover wrote:I would counter by saying that Holyfield wasn't as accurate as Ali, Louis and Holmes.Jon Saxon wrote:keithmoonhangover wrote:Better natural boxers. Louis, Ali, Holmes.
NO.
Louis was chinny and slow of foot,
Ali did not have an all round skill set no body punching etc etc..
Holmes slow of foot could not throw a hook of the jab.
C'mon any of you experts BRING IT!
He also didn't have as good a jab as them.
He also had a lot less power than Louis.
A good a jab if not better, the reason? he threw 3 types, staight jab (which even outjabed Bowe & Lewis at times and also a good 'up jab', HOWEVER Holy's double jab was the stuff of legend! he gave people with good jabs fits, for long periods he outjabbed Bowe who's jab (who's IMO) was the equal of Alis and Holmes (as in straigh jab from a big man).
Accurate?? ffs go back and look at Holys career, mate you are dead wrong here.
Go back and look at the combo the finished Tyson in the 1st fight, Tysons head was like a magnet to Holy's fists, sure Ali finishing Foreman was great but look at this from 6.01 secs http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=cb_IenOmK20
Is there a better HW COMBO finish at the highest level than this?
Methinks not!