Watson v Purdy - spoiler
Watson v Purdy - spoiler
Watson done in the fifth.
Re: Watson v Purdy - spoiler
Just watched it looks like Purdy has Watsons number.Ian 'Mr' McNeilly wrote:Watson done in the fifth.
Re: Watson v Purdy - spoiler
Yeppyenest77 wrote:Just watched it looks like Purdy has Watsons number.Ian 'Mr' McNeilly wrote:Watson done in the fifth.
Re: Watson v Purdy - spoiler
Well done Purdy. Doesn't get enough recognition
Re: Watson v Purdy - spoiler
Like to see Purdy v Vassell next first fight was good.potnoodle wrote:Well done Purdy. Doesn't get enough recognition
Re: Watson v Purdy - spoiler
anyone got a link?
Re: Watson v Purdy - spoiler
It'll be on Hatton TV from 7.30pm tomorrow.gmanji wrote:anyone got a link?
PURDY vs WATSON REMATCH RESULT
Anyone know the result?
Re: Watson v Purdy - spoiler
Looks like those people on the betting thread who got on Purdy at 7/2 and 3/1 will be having a party tonight! Unfortunately I never got round to it although I did fancy the bet, no good saying that now!
Re: Watson v Purdy - spoiler
Ian 'Mr' McNeilly wrote:It'll be on Hatton TV from 7.30pm tomorrow.gmanji wrote:anyone got a link?
cheers
Re: PURDY vs WATSON REMATCH RESULT
Purdy won in the fifth - as it says on another thread.mbond007 wrote:Anyone know the result?
Re: Watson v Purdy - spoiler
Purdy seems to have found his stride as a professional now.
Watson is no mug, but has been flattened two consecutive times now.
I really rate Craig too. Is this a sign of Purdy being improved, Watson declined - or simply that he is Watson's bogeyman ?
Watson is no mug, but has been flattened two consecutive times now.
I really rate Craig too. Is this a sign of Purdy being improved, Watson declined - or simply that he is Watson's bogeyman ?
Re: Watson v Purdy - spoiler
We won't know for sure until Purdy faces someone else - a match-up against Vassell again would seem to make perfect sense and would be a great benchmark in terms of determining how he's progressed from their last encounter.G0mez wrote: Is this a sign of Purdy being improved, Watson declined - or simply that he is Watson's bogeyman ?