hamdan v pawsey

patron
Heavyweight
Heavyweight
Posts: 448
Joined: 26 Mar 2008, 08:39

hamdan v pawsey

Post by patron »

what did you think of the decision in the main event last night,i thought it was a promoters result.all the best
rb63
Heavyweight
Heavyweight
Posts: 62
Joined: 21 Dec 2008, 00:47

Re: hamdan v pawsey

Post by rb63 »

Hamdan won easily.
Brute
Heavyweight
Heavyweight
Posts: 6993
Joined: 03 Dec 2005, 03:05

Re: hamdan v pawsey

Post by Brute »

I thought Nader did enough to win. Great fight.
Sweet P
Heavyweight
Heavyweight
Posts: 3669
Joined: 23 Mar 2003, 04:18

Re: hamdan v pawsey

Post by Sweet P »

Nader took it 116-112 in my opinion. There were a few close rounds but Nader did a bit more. Just my opinion and a rematch would be great.
I have to say, the whole card last night was great, Good tough fights.
Beltane
Heavyweight
Heavyweight
Posts: 4058
Joined: 02 Aug 2007, 02:12

Re: hamdan v pawsey

Post by Beltane »

Great fight and card with Nader just that bit busier and earned the judge's decision.
patron
Heavyweight
Heavyweight
Posts: 448
Joined: 26 Mar 2008, 08:39

Re: hamdan v pawsey

Post by patron »

Beltane wrote:Great fight and card with Nader just that bit busier and earned the judge's decision.
i had pawsey 2up going into the 11th, nader come home well but igave the 11th a draw,naders charge home swayed the judges,i can,t see how he won it easily,he got the nod and credit to him,i thought it was a good night, i still don,t believe a trainer of a fighter should be the promoter also,same as a fighter promoting his own fights,all of wich is just my opinion. all the best
dberry
Heavyweight
Heavyweight
Posts: 3350
Joined: 05 Jan 2010, 02:15

Re: hamdan v pawsey

Post by dberry »

patron wrote:
Beltane wrote:Great fight and card with Nader just that bit busier and earned the judge's decision.
i had pawsey 2up going into the 11th, nader come home well but igave the 11th a draw,naders charge home swayed the judges,i can,t see how he won it easily,he got the nod and credit to him,i thought it was a good night, i still don,t believe a trainer of a fighter should be the promoter also,same as a fighter promoting his own fights,all of wich is just my opinion. all the best
You do realise that the judges score each round individually then hand their score cards for the round in before the start of each round, don't you?
patron
Heavyweight
Heavyweight
Posts: 448
Joined: 26 Mar 2008, 08:39

Re: hamdan v pawsey

Post by patron »

dberry wrote:
patron wrote:
Beltane wrote:Great fight and card with Nader just that bit busier and earned the judge's decision.
i had pawsey 2up going into the 11th, nader come home well but igave the 11th a draw,naders charge home swayed the judges,i can,t see how he won it easily,he got the nod and credit to him,i thought it was a good night, i still don,t believe a trainer of a fighter should be the promoter also,same as a fighter promoting his own fights,all of wich is just my opinion. all the best
You do realise that the judges score each round individually then hand their score cards for the round in before the start of each round, don't you?
actually i thought they were sending dirty jokes,thanks for enlightening me on that point.all the best
dberry
Heavyweight
Heavyweight
Posts: 3350
Joined: 05 Jan 2010, 02:15

Re: hamdan v pawsey

Post by dberry »

:lol: Nice. Dirty jokes................. :o you know, they probably are.
All the best to you too sir.
buster007
Heavyweight
Heavyweight
Posts: 1899
Joined: 11 Oct 2007, 00:58

Re: hamdan v pawsey

Post by buster007 »

i thought they r writing their shopping list.

doh!!!
Mark pawsey
Cruiserweight
Posts: 340
Joined: 27 Aug 2010, 11:14

Re: hamdan v pawsey

Post by Mark pawsey »

Brute wrote:I thought Nader did enough to win. Great fight.
What do you mean he did enough to win? Who was the champion?
buster007
Heavyweight
Heavyweight
Posts: 1899
Joined: 11 Oct 2007, 00:58

Re: hamdan v pawsey

Post by buster007 »

means nader won.
Mark pawsey
Cruiserweight
Posts: 340
Joined: 27 Aug 2010, 11:14

Re: hamdan v pawsey

Post by Mark pawsey »

buster007 wrote:means nader won.
Ok but saying he did enough to win, is talking like he was the title holder. I've spoken to a few people about the fIght, all the people I've spoke to that know boxing say Daniel won, than all the people that, I've spokan to that don't know much about boxing say it was close.
Brute
Heavyweight
Heavyweight
Posts: 6993
Joined: 03 Dec 2005, 03:05

Re: hamdan v pawsey

Post by Brute »

It's a matter of opinion.
buster007
Heavyweight
Heavyweight
Posts: 1899
Joined: 11 Oct 2007, 00:58

Re: hamdan v pawsey

Post by buster007 »

mark,

i watched it and was hoping it was a draw.

i thought it was one of those fights where both fighters did plenty to say they don't deserve to lose. i feel for the fighters who put so much work into competing for a few minutes, showing a huge ticker in a war of a fight, but fights like this can be difficult to score.

naders punches were harder, but maybe didn't throw as many. he did catch many on the gloves too, that may have been the difference for the judges to award him the win.
D J Pawsey
Light Heavyweight
Posts: 207
Joined: 18 Jul 2011, 05:26

Re: hamdan v pawsey

Post by D J Pawsey »

I will say this about the fight. I personally think i won the fight 8 rounds to 4. Everyone else is entitled to there say. Nadar Told me i won before the decsion was read out.
A rematch would be great. We could do it in my home town of Condobolin. I just fought him on his home turf. Gary dean scored it 119 to 112 what a joke.
I'm ready to right now!!!
Brute
Heavyweight
Heavyweight
Posts: 6993
Joined: 03 Dec 2005, 03:05

Re: hamdan v pawsey

Post by Brute »

If it was as good as the fight the other night a rematch would be great. :box:
Mark pawsey
Cruiserweight
Posts: 340
Joined: 27 Aug 2010, 11:14

Re: hamdan v pawsey

Post by Mark pawsey »

patron wrote:
dberry wrote:
patron wrote: i had pawsey 2up going into the 11th, nader come home well but igave the 11th a draw,naders charge home swayed the judges,i can,t see how he won it easily,he got the nod and credit to him,i thought it was a good night, i still don,t believe a trainer of a fighter should be the promoter also,same as a fighter promoting his own fights,all of wich is just my opinion. all the best
You do realise that the judges score each round individually then hand their score cards for the round in before the start of each round, don't you?
actually i thought they were sending dirty jokes,thanks for enlightening me on that point.all the best
I think Garry Dean was sending dirty jokes, he must of been. I don't know what he was doing. I don't think he was watching the fight anyway.
Last edited by Mark pawsey on 06 Aug 2011, 14:56, edited 1 time in total.
#1 BoXa
Light Heavyweight
Posts: 216
Joined: 05 Aug 2011, 10:58

Re: hamdan v pawsey

Post by #1 BoXa »

Nader Hamdan won almost every round well done at the age of 37 , and all credit to his great trainer who is also my trainer Mick Akaway who has brought the best out in him... Nader "The Lionheart is the Bernard Hopkins of Aus..
buster007
Heavyweight
Heavyweight
Posts: 1899
Joined: 11 Oct 2007, 00:58

Re: hamdan v pawsey

Post by buster007 »

u have plenty of credibility, :)
Mark pawsey
Cruiserweight
Posts: 340
Joined: 27 Aug 2010, 11:14

Re: hamdan v pawsey

Post by Mark pawsey »

#1 BoXa wrote:Nader Hamdan won almost every round well done at the age of 37 , and all credit to his great trainer who is also my trainer Mick Akaway who has brought the best out in him... Nader "The Lionheart is the Bernard Hopkins of Aus..
Is your name Garry Dean?
D J Pawsey
Light Heavyweight
Posts: 207
Joined: 18 Jul 2011, 05:26

Re: hamdan v pawsey

Post by D J Pawsey »

#1boxa get ya head out of your ass. He won every round please and who gives 2 f..ks who you train with Nadar has already said in the daily telegraph he will not give me a rematch tells me all i need to know about the fight. Also before the decision was read out he told me he thought i won.
He is Chasing Stigletz hate to break it to him but Robert is fighting Kesller.
Nadar i'm hear waiting for the call the judges won't be needed this time it won,t go the distance
boxheadtrinidad
Light Heavyweight
Posts: 38
Joined: 07 Aug 2011, 08:28

Re: hamdan v pawsey

Post by boxheadtrinidad »

Hamdan did come home strong in late rounds, But i thought Pawsey was did enough...
boxheadtrinidad
Light Heavyweight
Posts: 38
Joined: 07 Aug 2011, 08:28

Re: hamdan v pawsey

Post by boxheadtrinidad »

D J Pawsey wrote:I will say this about the fight. I personally think i won the fight 8 rounds to 4. Everyone else is entitled to there say. Nadar Told me i won before the decsion was read out.
A rematch would be great. We could do it in my home town of Condobolin. I just fought him on his home turf. Gary dean scored it 119 to 112 what a joke.
I'm ready to right now!!!
:TU: if it goes to condo, get me a ticket....
boxheadtrinidad
Light Heavyweight
Posts: 38
Joined: 07 Aug 2011, 08:28

Re: hamdan v pawsey

Post by boxheadtrinidad »

#1 BoXa wrote:Nader Hamdan won almost every round well done at the age of 37 , and all credit to his great trainer who is also my trainer Mick Akaway who has brought the best out in him... Nader "The Lionheart is the Bernard Hopkins of Aus..
:lol: more like Bernard Tomic bahahahaha...
Post Reply