Troll much?jameswilson wrote:Really hope the Brit wins this.
Paul McCloskey v Bredis Prescott
Re: Paul McCloskey v Bredis Prescott
Re: Paul McCloskey v Bredis Prescott
The people who think Prescott will stop McCloskey need to watch something other than Prescott's fight with Khan. Aside from that fight, Prescott hasn't even come close to stopping or seriously hurting a decent opponent.
Re: Paul McCloskey v Bredis Prescott
Agreed. If I remember correctly he connected with some bombs against Mitchell and they didn't have that much of an effect. McCloskey has a solid chin aswell.crusader wrote:The people who think Prescott will stop McCloskey need to watch something other than Prescott's fight with Khan. Aside from that fight, Prescott hasn't even come close to stopping or seriously hurting a decent opponent.
Re: Paul McCloskey v Bredis Prescott
He also connected with bombs all night against Harrison Cuello and Humberto Toledo--both of whom have been knocked out several times---and yet he couldn't stop them. Prescott even looked out on his feet in the last round of the Toledo fight.Deno1986 wrote:Agreed. If I remember correctly he connected with some bombs against Mitchell and they didn't have that much of an effect. McCloskey has a solid chin aswell.crusader wrote:The people who think Prescott will stop McCloskey need to watch something other than Prescott's fight with Khan. Aside from that fight, Prescott hasn't even come close to stopping or seriously hurting a decent opponent.
Re: Paul McCloskey v Bredis Prescott
I havn't seen the Cuello fight but vaguely remember the Toleda fight, more so for the biting incident than the fight itself.crusader wrote:He also connected with bombs all night against Harrison Cuello and Humberto Toledo--both of whom have been knocked out several times---and yet he couldn't stop them. Prescott even looked out on his feet in the last round of the Toledo fight.Deno1986 wrote:Agreed. If I remember correctly he connected with some bombs against Mitchell and they didn't have that much of an effect. McCloskey has a solid chin aswell.crusader wrote:The people who think Prescott will stop McCloskey need to watch something other than Prescott's fight with Khan. Aside from that fight, Prescott hasn't even come close to stopping or seriously hurting a decent opponent.
-
slapbangwhallop
- Cruiserweight
- Posts: 2031
- Joined: 13 Dec 2010, 08:27
Re: Paul McCloskey v Bredis Prescott
I thought this sort of braindead trolling was only on ESB! Obviously not.jameswilson wrote:Really hope the Brit wins this.
p.s. nice of them to alter the Butchers Apron for the night.
p.p.s. you are hilarious!

Re: Paul McCloskey v Bredis Prescott
slapbangwhallop wrote:I thought this sort of braindead trolling was only on ESB! Obviously not.jameswilson wrote:Really hope the Brit wins this.
p.s. nice of them to alter the Butchers Apron for the night.
p.p.s. you are hilarious!
![]()
He knows he'll always get a response from you.
-
slapbangwhallop
- Cruiserweight
- Posts: 2031
- Joined: 13 Dec 2010, 08:27
Re: Paul McCloskey v Bredis Prescott
oh thats what he is doing. I hadnt realised.Giancarlo wrote:slapbangwhallop wrote:He knows he'll always get a response from you.jameswilson wrote:Really hope the Brit wins this.
-
GreenLightning
- Cruiserweight
- Posts: 915
- Joined: 20 Jul 2011, 15:23
Re: Paul McCloskey v Bredis Prescott
McCloskey schools him, gotta laugh at those picking Prescott.
-
alexpaterson
- Heavyweight

- Posts: 4310
- Joined: 22 Feb 2009, 11:22
Re: Paul McCloskey v Bredis Prescott
Good comeback fight, get his rankings up a wee bit and a well known name. McClosley should have too much for the ridiculously one dimensional Prescott. If Prescott can't land his big shot early he won't land it ad he starts loading up and banking on the one shot which should suit McCloskey, as long as he stays focused at all time
-
jameswilson
- Heavyweight

- Posts: 13411
- Joined: 08 Jan 2004, 18:01
Re: Paul McCloskey v Bredis Prescott
Excuse me while I put my fishing rod away.
-
slapbangwhallop
- Cruiserweight
- Posts: 2031
- Joined: 13 Dec 2010, 08:27
Re: Paul McCloskey v Bredis Prescott
oh you were fishing, oh jesus you got me, it was that subtle and crafted that I didnt notice it was a sad trolling bag of a shite!jameswilson wrote:Excuse me while I put my fishing rod away.
Now %^*& off you %(^&ing pathetic £$&%!
Re: Paul McCloskey v Bredis Prescott
Should buy McCloskey some noise with the Khan connection.
Re: Paul McCloskey v Bredis Prescott
I'll be getting tickets as soon as they are on sale. The Odyssey in Belfast is a great venue for boxing. The atmosphere for the Rogan fights was unreal an now that Dudey's profile has risen due to the Khan fight I see a great attendance. McCloskey to win on points for me.
Re: Paul McCloskey v Bredis Prescott
McCloskey by a stretch, Prescott will swing a few times, miss, and then get countered. Could go on like that for 12 rounds.
Re: Paul McCloskey v Bredis Prescott
Breidis Brescott?leforge wrote:Brescott is there number 5.earsjohn wrote:Is he the highest ranked fighter that the WBA haven't already given a belt to? Given the number of belts they're prone to dish out, he's probably barely in their top 20.The Dark Destroyer wrote:WBA title eliminator? I hope Prescott wins then, I couldn't be bothered watching another six rounds of what we saw last time.
How did Prescott even get himself into an eliminator?
Good fight though.

Re: Paul McCloskey v Bredis Prescott
If McCloskey wins it would be amazing to see the likes of Maidana come to Belfast, no idea if this is in the pipeline or not
-
slapbangwhallop
- Cruiserweight
- Posts: 2031
- Joined: 13 Dec 2010, 08:27
Re: Paul McCloskey v Bredis Prescott
John and Edward = Jedward.@matt___s wrote:Breidis Brescott?leforge wrote:Brescott is there number 5.earsjohn wrote: Is he the highest ranked fighter that the WBA haven't already given a belt to? Given the number of belts they're prone to dish out, he's probably barely in their top 20.
Good fight though.
Breidis Prescott = Brescott
Re: Paul McCloskey v Bredis Prescott
Actually, I think that if Prescott can land clean, he could this fight...
Does McCloskey believe he can win this? I'm not even sure... To me this smells like a "cashing in" job.
![[icon_shame.gif] :shame:](./images/smilies/icon_shame.gif)
Does McCloskey believe he can win this? I'm not even sure... To me this smells like a "cashing in" job.
Re: Paul McCloskey v Bredis Prescott
IMO this is a sh1t matchup and heres why - the winner wont get to fight Khan...
Re: Paul McCloskey v Bredis Prescott
Yeah, but the winner of the fight will be hunting for Amir Kahn, that's for sure.@matt___s wrote:IMO this is a sh1t matchup and heres why - the winner wont get to fight Khan...
Re: Paul McCloskey v Bredis Prescott
Whatever you say, Crease...Crease wrote:Actually, I think that if Prescott can land clean, he could this fight...
Does McCloskey believe he can win this? I'm not even sure... To me this smells like a "cashing in" job.
Our difference of opinion on Dudeys career will forever be intact if you think this is a "cashing in" fight. Prescott really isn't that special and McCloskey has the perfect style to beat him.
Re: Paul McCloskey v Bredis Prescott
Mate, Prescott is a decent fighter (I'm not pretending he's a knockout artist or anything) but it seems an odd fight for McCloskey to take considering that Prescott has been fighting up at Welterweight.Deno1986 wrote:Our difference of opinion on Dudeys career will forever be intact if you think this is a "cashing in" fight. Prescott really isn't that special and McCloskey has the perfect style to beat him.
Why didn't McCloskey go for Mabuza or Holt or better yet a fight against Kotelnik (that would let the division know that Paul means business, because it seems only elite fighters beat Kotelnik).
Re: Paul McCloskey v Bredis Prescott
I've read in BN this is a final elliminator to face khan thats why he's taken the fight. i want bredis to win in hopes of a repeat but i think mcClosky willCrease wrote:Mate, Prescott is a decent fighter (I'm not pretending he's a knockout artist or anything) but it seems an odd fight for McCloskey to take considering that Prescott has been fighting up at Welterweight.Deno1986 wrote:Our difference of opinion on Dudeys career will forever be intact if you think this is a "cashing in" fight. Prescott really isn't that special and McCloskey has the perfect style to beat him.
Why didn't McCloskey go for Mabuza or Holt or better yet a fight against Kotelnik (that would let the division know that Paul means business, because it seems only elite fighters beat Kotelnik).
Re: Paul McCloskey v Bredis Prescott
Prescott has never fought at Welterweight, he was a lightweight who has moved up to light-welterweight.Crease wrote:Mate, Prescott is a decent fighter (I'm not pretending he's a knockout artist or anything) but it seems an odd fight for McCloskey to take considering that Prescott has been fighting up at Welterweight.Deno1986 wrote:Our difference of opinion on Dudeys career will forever be intact if you think this is a "cashing in" fight. Prescott really isn't that special and McCloskey has the perfect style to beat him.
Why didn't McCloskey go for Mabuza or Holt or better yet a fight against Kotelnik (that would let the division know that Paul means business, because it seems only elite fighters beat Kotelnik).
Prescott has that name recognition amongst casual fans after he beat Khan so it would be an easy sell. Mabuza has recently switched up to welterweight and is fighting for the much coveted IBO title in September. Holt wouldn't travel to Belfast for a fight but he could be a possible opponent for Paul if he ever decided to chance it in America. I agree with you on Kotelnik as a potential opponent, he has been successful at the level Dudey is trying to reach and would provide a stern test. However it is Prescott who is coming to Belfast and gives the Irishman a great chance to get a rematch with Khan or the winner of Maidana-Guerrero which I think will be Guerrero by the way.