Amir Khan = Britains Best Boxer

Deadendgeneration
Heavyweight
Heavyweight
Posts: 1906
Joined: 21 Feb 2009, 19:01

Re: Amir Khan = Britains Best Boxer

Post by Deadendgeneration »

banjo wrote:
Big-Beryl wrote:He's very fortunate to even be world champion IMO.
To win the title he beat Kotelnik far more convincingly than anyone else has.

Basically the only person to beat Kotelnik convincingly.
whiskey
Heavyweight
Heavyweight
Posts: 11956
Joined: 27 Mar 2007, 14:52

Re: Amir Khan = Britains Best Boxer

Post by whiskey »

observer1 wrote:
gomez is an idiot /thread
Yep your probably right. I'll refrain from discussing it any further in the future.

You have your opinions and I have mine on his actions/comments.
observer1
Heavyweight
Heavyweight
Posts: 1836
Joined: 27 Nov 2007, 22:30

Re: Amir Khan = Britains Best Boxer

Post by observer1 »

G0mez wrote:
observer1 wrote:
gomez is an idiot /thread
Yep your probably right. I'll refrain from discussing it any further in the future.

You have your opinions and I have mine on his actions/comments.
Everyone has opinions, the only difference here is that you think your Opinions are more reliable than facts :TU:
whiskey
Heavyweight
Heavyweight
Posts: 11956
Joined: 27 Mar 2007, 14:52

Re: Amir Khan = Britains Best Boxer

Post by whiskey »

observer1 wrote:
G0mez wrote:
observer1 wrote:
gomez is an idiot /thread
Yep your probably right. I'll refrain from discussing it any further in the future.

You have your opinions and I have mine on his actions/comments.
Everyone has opinions, the only difference here is that you think your Opinions are more reliable than facts :TU:
you want to keep this up do you ?
observer1
Heavyweight
Heavyweight
Posts: 1836
Joined: 27 Nov 2007, 22:30

Re: Amir Khan = Britains Best Boxer

Post by observer1 »

G0mez wrote:
observer1 wrote:
G0mez wrote: Yep your probably right. I'll refrain from discussing it any further in the future.

You have your opinions and I have mine on his actions/comments.
Everyone has opinions, the only difference here is that you think your Opinions are more reliable than facts :TU:
you want to keep this up do you ?
Keep what up? How about you reply to gobbles post where he tore apart your libelous BS comments ?
Craig14
Heavyweight
Heavyweight
Posts: 2933
Joined: 17 Jun 2010, 12:25

Re: Amir Khan = Britains Best Boxer

Post by Craig14 »

Observer do you come on here just to argue?
observer1
Heavyweight
Heavyweight
Posts: 1836
Joined: 27 Nov 2007, 22:30

Re: Amir Khan = Britains Best Boxer

Post by observer1 »

yid14 wrote:Observer do you come on here just to argue?
The whole point of a Forum is to debate/discuss.

Whether the whole point i come on here is to argue or not is irrelevant. If i have something to say, with something to back it up, then there should be no problem. Any disagreements? fair enough.

But when it comes to delusional fan boys spouting libelous crap, they need to be put in their place.

Anyone who didn't know any better and came on this forum will leave thinking Mayweather is a ducking fraud, Pacquaio is a cheating fraud, the best boxer is the one with the least losses on his resumé.

Seriously, this place is turning into ridiculous forums like BS each passing day.
Craig14
Heavyweight
Heavyweight
Posts: 2933
Joined: 17 Jun 2010, 12:25

Re: Amir Khan = Britains Best Boxer

Post by Craig14 »

observer1 wrote:
yid14 wrote:Observer do you come on here just to argue?
The whole point of a Forum is to debate/discuss.

Whether the whole point i come on here is to argue or not is irrelevant. If i have something to say, with something to back it up, then there should be no problem. Any disagreements? fair enough.

But when it comes to delusional fan boys spouting libelous crap, they need to be put in their place.

Anyone who didn't know any better and came on this forum will leave thinking Mayweather is a ducking fraud, Pacquaio is a cheating fraud, the best boxer is the one with the least losses on his resumé.

Seriously, this place is turning into ridiculous forums like BS each passing day.
Why are you still here then?
observer1
Heavyweight
Heavyweight
Posts: 1836
Joined: 27 Nov 2007, 22:30

Re: Amir Khan = Britains Best Boxer

Post by observer1 »

yid14 wrote:
observer1 wrote:
yid14 wrote:Observer do you come on here just to argue?
The whole point of a Forum is to debate/discuss.

Whether the whole point i come on here is to argue or not is irrelevant. If i have something to say, with something to back it up, then there should be no problem. Any disagreements? fair enough.

But when it comes to delusional fan boys spouting libelous crap, they need to be put in their place.

Anyone who didn't know any better and came on this forum will leave thinking Mayweather is a ducking fraud, Pacquaio is a cheating fraud, the best boxer is the one with the least losses on his resumé.

Seriously, this place is turning into ridiculous forums like BS each passing day.
Why are you still here then?
read first sentence
Captain Hook
Heavyweight
Heavyweight
Posts: 4730
Joined: 07 May 2007, 09:40

Re: Amir Khan = Britains Best Boxer

Post by Captain Hook »

The Dark Destroyer wrote:It comes to something when a fighter goes after the number one guy, gets turned downed and then goes after the other title holder in the division and is criticised for it.
Well said....

And Bradley has no fights lined up against anyone has he? Hasn't he fallen out with his promoters?

Khan wants Bradley in December but Bradley is worried he'll lose and that will scupper his chance of a pay day vs Manny or Floyd, the fights he really wants, for cash rather than legacy reasons.
Post Reply