Sorry about the grim title. I'm not going anywhere just yet (touch wood) but look at this............
http://uk.ufc.com/fighter
How nice does that look. I don't mind weight divisions but i'd love boxing to look like this again.
Agree completely. Shame its too late to ever get to that nowJeff Thomas wrote:![]()
Sorry about the grim title. I'm not going anywhere just yet (touch wood) but look at this............
http://uk.ufc.com/fighter
How nice does that look. I don't mind weight divisions but i'd love boxing to look like this again.
I don't think so; it's come full circleJosh1111 wrote:Agree completely. Shame its too late to ever get to that nowJeff Thomas wrote:![]()
Sorry about the grim title. I'm not going anywhere just yet (touch wood) but look at this............
http://uk.ufc.com/fighter
How nice does that look. I don't mind weight divisions but i'd love boxing to look like this again.
I agree with you Jeff, Utopia for boxing fans.Jeff Thomas wrote:![]()
Sorry about the grim title. I'm not going anywhere just yet (touch wood) but look at this............
http://uk.ufc.com/fighter
How nice does that look. I don't mind weight divisions but i'd love boxing to look like this again.
One title, one champion- one single, fair ratings system! It could easily be doneScottrf wrote:Jeff, two options:
1. You get to fight for the WBO title in a winnable matchup.
2. You can abolish the alphabet belts and create a single governing body.
What do you choose?
But would you fight for a dodgy title if you got the chance Jeff?Jeff Thomas wrote:One title, one champion- one single, fair ratings system! It could easily be doneScottrf wrote:Jeff, two options:
1. You get to fight for the WBO title in a winnable matchup.
2. You can abolish the alphabet belts and create a single governing body.
What do you choose?
Easily how? You would have to get 3 of the organisations to pull out and give up the money they are currently making.Jeff Thomas wrote:One title, one champion- one single, fair ratings system! It could easily be done
1. Get a national commision in the States.Scottrf wrote:Easily how? You would have to get 3 of the organisations to pull out and give up the money they are currently making.Jeff Thomas wrote:One title, one champion- one single, fair ratings system! It could easily be done
Nice idea can't see it happening though.keithmoonhangover wrote:1. Get a national commision in the States.Scottrf wrote:Easily how? You would have to get 3 of the organisations to pull out and give up the money they are currently making.Jeff Thomas wrote:One title, one champion- one single, fair ratings system! It could easily be done
2. Get all the national commisions to band together FIFA style.
3. Get the new organisation to publish completely independant rankings.
4. Appoint a champion on merit - like the Ring Magazine title.
5. Commisions refuse to sanction alphabet titles.
You also need to get the boxers to stop recognising the alphabet titles. Why would they if it can get them extra money by calling a fight a 'World Title Fight'? Would casual fans be clued up enough to differentiate between this new body and the WBC for example? Would the promoters be willing to ignore them if it means sacrificing money?keithmoonhangover wrote:1. Get a national commision in the States.Scottrf wrote:Easily how? You would have to get 3 of the organisations to pull out and give up the money they are currently making.Jeff Thomas wrote:One title, one champion- one single, fair ratings system! It could easily be done
2. Get all the national commisions to band together FIFA style.
3. Get the new organisation to publish completely independant rankings.
4. Appoint a champion on merit - like the Ring Magazine title.
5. Commisions refuse to sanction alphabet titles.
If, say the BBBofC refused to sanction the title, then it wouldn't happen.Scottrf wrote:You also need to get the boxers to stop recognising the alphabet titles. Why would they if it can get them extra money by calling a fight a 'World Title Fight'? Would casual fans be clued up enough to differentiate between this new body and the WBC for example? Would the promoters be willing to ignore them if it means sacrificing money?keithmoonhangover wrote:1. Get a national commision in the States.Scottrf wrote: Easily how? You would have to get 3 of the organisations to pull out and give up the money they are currently making.
2. Get all the national commisions to band together FIFA style.
3. Get the new organisation to publish completely independant rankings.
4. Appoint a champion on merit - like the Ring Magazine title.
5. Commisions refuse to sanction alphabet titles.
Choose to ignore the titles! Why aren't the ibo or WBF or wbu taken seriously? Why should the big four be considered serious?Scottrf wrote:Easily how? You would have to get 3 of the organisations to pull out and give up the money they are currently making.Jeff Thomas wrote:One title, one champion- one single, fair ratings system! It could easily be done
Where's all the money to do this going to come from. What about the lawsuits from the sanctioning bodies, who will take it to court? Cental government in the US aren't going to spend the money to do this. Commissions are pretty powerless most of them, it's only really nevada that have any serious clout.keithmoonhangover wrote:1. Get a national commision in the States.Scottrf wrote:Easily how? You would have to get 3 of the organisations to pull out and give up the money they are currently making.Jeff Thomas wrote:One title, one champion- one single, fair ratings system! It could easily be done
2. Get all the national commisions to band together FIFA style.
3. Get the new organisation to publish completely independant rankings.
4. Appoint a champion on merit - like the Ring Magazine title.
5. Commisions refuse to sanction alphabet titles.
I'm sure the BBBofC used to refuse to sanction one governing body, back in the late 80's. It might have been the WBO? My memory isn't what it used to be. Maybe Ezzard will remember.Datsue wrote:As others have said it's all a bit long-shotty (& I am well aware that they have their own fair share of problems & that it's not some sort of fistic utopia, ta) but does anyone know how come the Japanese won't have anything to do with any title that's not the WBC or WBA? I know that's like saying "Yeah, only these two rapists on the girl-scout trip, all you other rapists stay at home" but it's a start, I feel.
Does the Japanese boxing commission merely refuse to sanction the other alphabets or is it more a case of they're not legally allowed to trade in Japan or what?