Mitchell v Rios

Post Reply
wrimc
Heavyweight
Heavyweight
Posts: 680
Joined: 11 Apr 2010, 14:36

Mitchell v Rios

Post by wrimc »

http://news.boxrec.com/news/2011/mitche ... murray-win

So this is looking like a possibility for the new season. Personally I believe that this would be suicide for Mitchell it would be Katsidis part 2. Rios is an absolute monster currently and Mitchell just doesnt deal that well with pressure. He had some hairy moments against Murray and was demolished by Katsidis. Rios is from the same mould.

After the comments made in BM about Darren Barker and the Martinez fight by Allegedly it seems to me that this fight would also be a fight that Mitchell would stand little chance in.

Opinions?
Camcas
Cruiserweight
Posts: 881
Joined: 12 Sep 2010, 14:18

Re: Mitchell v Rios

Post by Camcas »

Another American who is massively overated, i give Mitchell quite a big chance here
ShadrachSimmo
Cruiserweight
Posts: 4738
Joined: 20 Oct 2010, 05:42

Re: Mitchell v Rios

Post by ShadrachSimmo »

If he struggled to hold off Katsidis i think he'd do the same with Rios. He was brilliant against Murray but Rios is looking so destructive it's a big task.
twenty six
Heavyweight
Heavyweight
Posts: 3574
Joined: 17 Jun 2006, 13:43

Re: Mitchell v Rios

Post by twenty six »

Like I said on the other thread, using his Promotor's view on how a boxer's career should be facilitated, there is no way he would be allowed to take this fight.
ArtOfWar
Heavyweight
Heavyweight
Posts: 1253
Joined: 24 Oct 2003, 11:54

Re: Mitchell v Rios

Post by ArtOfWar »

Camcas wrote:Another American who is massively overated, i give Mitchell quite a big chance here
I don't think he's massively overrated. He's just very exciting and teak tough. On paper it looks like a tough task for Mitchell.
lefthook82
Heavyweight
Heavyweight
Posts: 1837
Joined: 07 Mar 2008, 04:33

Re: Mitchell v Rios

Post by lefthook82 »

Camcas wrote:Another American who is massively overated, i give Mitchell quite a big chance here
I'll give him a big chance of getting knocked out

Warren wont make the fight anyway so it's a moot point
hitman_hatton1
Heavyweight
Heavyweight
Posts: 6150
Joined: 26 Nov 2003, 20:57

Re: Mitchell v Rios

Post by hitman_hatton1 »

rios would walk all over mitchell. :KO:
whiskey
Heavyweight
Heavyweight
Posts: 11956
Joined: 27 Mar 2007, 14:52

Re: Mitchell v Rios

Post by whiskey »

Rios is a genuinely hard bastard at lightweight.

He's no Floyd Mayweather, but he's the genuine article.

It's a fight Kevin would certainly be the underdog in and with good reason.
allahsnackbar
Cruiserweight
Posts: 302
Joined: 18 May 2011, 13:36

Re: Mitchell v Rios

Post by allahsnackbar »

excuse the pun but it literally would be BAM BAM for mitchell and the fight would be over quite quickly, perhaps in 1 round
THEBUTCH
Heavyweight
Heavyweight
Posts: 6645
Joined: 27 Jan 2004, 08:51

Re: Mitchell v Rios

Post by THEBUTCH »

I like the thought of this exciting match, it's a huge task for Mitchell, but he's just come through with flying colours against a very tough, agressive, pressure fighter in Murray.

There's no bigger stage than America on the same bill as Pacquiao v Marquez, and Mitchell deserves a big reward for his triumph over Murray. Will Warren let this happen? I think he should and let Mitchell try to become a big star.
crusader
Heavyweight
Heavyweight
Posts: 16875
Joined: 19 Jan 2009, 20:14

Re: Mitchell v Rios

Post by crusader »

Camcas wrote:Another American who is massively overated, i give Mitchell quite a big chance here
Why is Rios massively overrated?
whiskey
Heavyweight
Heavyweight
Posts: 11956
Joined: 27 Mar 2007, 14:52

Re: Mitchell v Rios

Post by whiskey »

Just saw another thread on this.

Someone predicted "Rios by death"

Seems like not many backing a Mitchell upset :o
Camcas
Cruiserweight
Posts: 881
Joined: 12 Sep 2010, 14:18

Re: Mitchell v Rios

Post by Camcas »

crusader wrote:
Camcas wrote:Another American who is massively overated, i give Mitchell quite a big chance here
Why is Rios massively overrated?
Because he is seen as invincible at lightweight when he is really quite beatable, and i think he is a fighter who looks very good against weaker opposition, but will struggle when someone can take his power
wrimc
Heavyweight
Heavyweight
Posts: 680
Joined: 11 Apr 2010, 14:36

Re: Mitchell v Rios

Post by wrimc »

Camcas wrote:
crusader wrote:
Camcas wrote:Another American who is massively overated, i give Mitchell quite a big chance here
Why is Rios massively overrated?
Because he is seen as invincible at lightweight when he is really quite beatable, and i think he is a fighter who looks very good against weaker opposition, but will struggle when someone can take his power
And Mitchell is the man to take his power?!
Jeff Thomas
Heavyweight
Heavyweight
Posts: 3016
Joined: 30 Apr 2009, 06:32

Re: Mitchell v Rios

Post by Jeff Thomas »

Frank doesn't do tough fights anymore
Camcas
Cruiserweight
Posts: 881
Joined: 12 Sep 2010, 14:18

Re: Mitchell v Rios

Post by Camcas »

wrimc wrote:
Camcas wrote:
crusader wrote: Why is Rios massively overrated?
Because he is seen as invincible at lightweight when he is really quite beatable, and i think he is a fighter who looks very good against weaker opposition, but will struggle when someone can take his power
And Mitchell is the man to take his power?!
Maybe i doubt it, but to not give him a chance i think is ridicoulous
Final round
Cruiserweight
Posts: 4911
Joined: 20 Oct 2010, 17:02

Re: Mitchell v Rios

Post by Final round »

Acosta seemed to have a fair bit of success on the punch and move, granted he had fast hands but Mitchell packs some poke of his own....I don't think Mitchell is strong enough though.

Rios is exciting and destined for big things IMO but he's the typical pressure fighter, takes some and overwhelms but that style can get picked apart by the right fighter.
THEBUTCH
Heavyweight
Heavyweight
Posts: 6645
Joined: 27 Jan 2004, 08:51

Re: Mitchell v Rios

Post by THEBUTCH »

Jeff Thomas, hear what you're saying but Mitchell-Murray looked a pretty tough fight from my view.
danfoster
Heavyweight
Heavyweight
Posts: 651
Joined: 02 Feb 2009, 05:07

Re: Mitchell v Rios

Post by danfoster »

THEBUTCH wrote:Jeff Thomas, hear what you're saying but Mitchell-Murray looked a pretty tough fight from my view.
I agree - same goes for Degale v Groves (although i accept most people, including me, thought it would be an easy night's work for Degale).

I think the truth is that in the current climate, Sky just wont take walk-overs anymore - and rightly so. Fury v Chisora on FIVE PROVED that the public retain a great appetite for truly competitive matches (and nothing less).
addi
Heavyweight
Heavyweight

Re: Mitchell v Rios

Post by addi »

mitchell got a great chance in this fight it's 50/50 rios is stronge but mitchell is tough and a better boxer people keep bringing up katsides but if your only as good as your last fight mitchell looked pretty good to me.
MightyWarrior
Heavyweight
Heavyweight
Posts: 13319
Joined: 23 Jan 2003, 14:01

Re: Mitchell v Rios

Post by MightyWarrior »

Maybe Kev should go for it, he takes a lot of punches in the tough fights, so might not get much better. Go for it while his confidence is up, and maybe Rios, big puncher that he is, might be a bit over rated.
black panther
Heavyweight
Heavyweight
Posts: 4097
Joined: 11 Dec 2003, 07:06

Re: Mitchell v Rios

Post by black panther »

MightyWarrior wrote:Maybe Kev should go for it, he takes a lot of punches in the tough fights, so might not get much better. Go for it while his confidence is up, and maybe Rios, big puncher that he is, might be a bit over rated.
I agree, nothing to lose has Mitchell. Admittedly I think Rios would eventually catch upto him but if he gives a good account of himself even in a losing effort, he'll get more opportunities as a result.
LeedsLad
Heavyweight
Heavyweight
Posts: 996
Joined: 02 Jul 2010, 06:15

Re: Mitchell v Rios

Post by LeedsLad »

I think Mitchell did wonderfully well to withstand an onslaught from Murray before grinding him down and stopping him.

But let's not go overboard here, Rios is easily superior to both Murray and Prescott in pretty much every department.

There's only Marquez at 135 who I'd favour against him. The legend would take him apart and stop him, but the rest are asking for trouble facing him IMO.
Post Reply