why do boxers need pr.... they never have in the past & dont need it now. the beauty about boxing & boxers is that they are real. there is no potentiousness & why make priks on the internet happy who have never bought a ticket in there life & stream every ppv going :!:
we all row on any sport with our opinions :!: even those closest have diffrent outlooks, if we agreed there would be no debate, no point.ive had opinions changed on here & read on things i never knew previously.
smigga corrected me a few times on here D but his manner was pi$$ed off & abit demeaning & i thought what a melt but it is personal to him & you learn certain people are touchy & try to respect it or possibly have a wind up
hurlock wrote:why do boxers need pr.... they never have in the past & dont need it now. the beauty about boxing & boxers is that they are real. there is no potentiousness & why make priks on the internet happy who have never bought a ticket in there life & stream every ppv going :!:
we all row on any sport with our opinions :!: even those closest have diffrent outlooks, if we agreed there would be no debate, no point.ive had opinions changed on here & read on things i never knew previously.
smigga corrected me a few times on here D but his manner was pi$$ed off & abit demeaning & i thought what a melt but it is personal to him & you learn certain people are touchy & try to respect it or possibly have a wind up
I think smiggas the kind of guy who would be a good mate but a dour faced fuk at the same time if you see what I mean.
Biscuits wrote:No but their should a boring, self absorbed. w*nker section just for you Jono
After making a complete fool of yourself with your two whinging threads about the nasty pm's from Cakes, you think you'd have the sense to lay low for a while, but no instead you post this drivel and actually succeed in making yourself look even MORE foolish
Biscuits wrote:No but their should a boring, self absorbed. w*nker section just for you Jono
After making a complete fool of yourself with your two whinging threads about the nasty pm's from Cakes, you think you'd have the sense to lay low for a while, but no instead you post this drivel and actually succeed in making yourself look even MORE foolish
Hey Jon I think u have got some massive haters on this forum and I can see why you pin point Ryan Rhodes a lot and a lot of posters like Ryan you should stop trying to "get your point across" so many times. I have read the same comment about Rhodes so many times that ship has sailed start causing some more arquements with different posters
wesley05 wrote:Hey Jon I think u have got some massive haters on this forum and I can see why you pin point Ryan Rhodes a lot and a lot of posters like Ryan you should stop trying to "get your point across" so many times. I have read the same comment about Rhodes so many times that ship has sailed start causing some more arquements with different posters
I hear you and you are right it will be the last time I will mention it.
On a side note I only exist on here to talk boxing related issues not to gain virtual friends (although there are many nice people on here) as my life is full enough.
If I offend I offend, its not personal I'm just a hardcore fan who hates internet bullies and who in real life takes no shite from no kunt.
Jon Saxon wrote:
Everyone liked Paul smith untill he lost, (I always felt he was a dour faced fat middleweight and said so...)
See, that sort of comment shows exactly why you would fit in better in the Current Scene area or over at Eastside.
No you "See" that was my exact point you cheeky chapie.
You should be able to say stuff like "he's just a fat MW" without some family member getting up in yo ass. Now do you "see"?
As for where I "fit in"? you couldn't even begin to understand mate so to try to pigeonhole me as it's beyond your ken.
I'm not going to get dragged into some slagging war no matter what is fired at me.
Jon Saxon wrote:
Everyone liked Paul smith untill he lost, (I always felt he was a dour faced fat middleweight and said so...)
See, that sort of comment shows exactly why you would fit in better in the Current Scene area or over at Eastside.
No you "See" that was my exact point you cheeky chapie.
You should be able to say stuff like "he's just a fat MW" without some family member getting up in yo ass. Now do you "see"?
As for where I "fit in"? you couldn't even begin to understand mate so to try to pigeonhole me as it's beyond your ken.
I'm not going to get dragged into some slagging war no matter what is fired at me.
Not even if "cakes" scares the crap out of you again?
Giancarlo wrote:
See, that sort of comment shows exactly why you would fit in better in the Current Scene area or over at Eastside.
No you "See" that was my exact point you cheeky chapie.
You should be able to say stuff like "he's just a fat MW" without some family member getting up in yo ass. Now do you "see"?
As for where I "fit in"? you couldn't even begin to understand mate so to try to pigeonhole me as it's beyond your ken.
I'm not going to get dragged into some slagging war no matter what is fired at me.
Not even if "cakes" scares the crap out of you again?
not funny not even sarcy funny, I simply wanted him removed, he meant nothing to me but it was fun getting rid of a keyboard commando.
I hope you now "see" what I meant in my previous post and can absorb it.
Not fat as in Tony Booth fat but he's defo a MW (frame wise) and I think he might have done more had he kept his weight under control from day one.
Why you having a pop at Tony Booth? He was a great pro. Not really covering yourself in glory the last few days are you?
Mate its nothing personaL, I think Tony Booth is great AND (I took fukng pelters on the dogpound for saying this) I think that he could have been a champ If he really tried, I watched the doc about him on youtube and liked him even more.
Tony was just the first overweight fighter that popped into my head thats all, I have mega respect for Tony
I hope you can see this as a simple 'first thing thats pops into your head' type of thing and not some weird vendetta against boxers.
Jon Saxon wrote:
Not fat as in Tony Booth fat but he's defo a MW (frame wise) and I think he might have done more had he kept his weight under control from day one.
Why you having a pop at Tony Booth? He was a great pro. Not really covering yourself in glory the last few days are you?
Talented chap Booth. But one can't deny he was fat as f**k for half of his career, come on.
Yeah when he started getting older and fighting heavies, I don't s'pose sitting in a forklift truck (i think that was his job) for 8-10 hours aday didn't help training. Still over 50 wins and fought loads of champions.
Where would you class me Mr Saxon ?
I am a boxing fan.
I am well into my fifties.
I've followed boxing for 33 years, travelling all over the place.
I am lucky to have friends in the boxing fraternity.
You seem to class me as "in the trade".
Why ?
I only comment on stuff that I think I have a reasonable knowledge on and either that will marry with another poster's opinion or will oppose another poster's opinion.
What then follows is a debate on the subject.
I don't indulge in petty crappy gutter language and jokes I used to tell in the 60's in the playground.
Long long before you were around here I've had many a heated debate with other posters.
Sometimes I was proven to be right, other times I was proven to be wrong.
Isn't that exactly what a FORUM is about ?
If what you seek is a genuine debate without fear of reprisals tone down your crap, be factual and put forward your argument in a stuctured manner - but for Christ's sake if you use inflamatory language like Rhodes is a bottler, Rhodes is a flop what the do you expect ?
D but his manner was pi$$ed off & abit demeaning & i thought what a melt but it is personal to him & you learn certain people are touchy & try to respect it or possibly have a wind up 
i'll go back to sending him abusive pm's
[/url]