Griffith v McCallum
-
elmersalsa
- Heavyweight
- Posts: 15690
- Joined: 02 Feb 2003, 03:50
Re: Griffith v McCallum
A hard fight for both men. But I got to say that Griffith pressure and quickness would be the key. Griffith by UD.
-
Goodnight, Irene
- Heavyweight
- Posts: 9463
- Joined: 24 Sep 2007, 04:43
Re: Griffith v McCallum
Wow, what a great fight. Can I say a draw?
Maybe I'd plump for McCallum (IMO, the most formidable 154lber ever, including Hearns), but it would be a very hard-fought scrap.
Maybe I'd plump for McCallum (IMO, the most formidable 154lber ever, including Hearns), but it would be a very hard-fought scrap.
-
Counter-puncher
- Heavyweight
- Posts: 39141
- Joined: 20 May 2008, 11:41
Re: Griffith v McCallum
I'd have Griffith *just* outworking Mike, but a tough, tough fight for both men.
Re: Griffith v McCallum
good matchup ill take ringside tickets. oh yea. Body Snatcher by sd.
-
flatnoseflynn
- Heavyweight
- Posts: 319
- Joined: 14 Sep 2009, 16:42
Re: Griffith v McCallum
McCallum for me brillant defence wicked body attack late stoppage I reckon 
-
King Carlos
- Heavyweight
- Posts: 1123
- Joined: 11 May 2010, 19:10
Re: Griffith v McCallum
McCallum was the better Middleweight, in my opinion. He'd take it clean on the cards. Would be an excellent boxing match, but I think McCallum's extra dimensions at this weight would seal it for him. Griffith became less versatile the further along his career went.