Macklin signs for DiBella

slapbangwhallop
Cruiserweight
Posts: 2031
Joined: 13 Dec 2010, 08:27

Re: Macklin signs for DiBella

Post by slapbangwhallop »

Asterix wrote:Does this mean, then, that:
1) The Sturm rematch isn't going to happen?
and 2) Macklin will fight the winner of Martinez vs Barker?
1) More than likely.
2) Probably, unless Andy Lee gets in there first.

Potential "eliminator" between Lee and Macklin, assuming Lee gets past Vera and Macklin gets past whoever in November.
slapbangwhallop
Cruiserweight
Posts: 2031
Joined: 13 Dec 2010, 08:27

Re: Macklin signs for DiBella

Post by slapbangwhallop »

Josh1111 wrote: I think he's blown his chance of a re-match by changing promoters yet again.
Josh1111 wrote: Agree, Sturm knows what to expect now so will win the rematch quite easily
Josh1111 wrote:He's the world champion, why does he need to give macklin a better deal? I certainly wouldn't
You should really think about starting to write BoxingNews24
Last edited by slapbangwhallop on 04 Aug 2011, 19:22, edited 1 time in total.
Asterix
Heavyweight
Heavyweight
Posts: 7128
Joined: 02 Nov 2007, 10:42

Re: Macklin signs for DiBella

Post by Asterix »

slapbangwhallop wrote:
Asterix wrote:Does this mean, then, that:
1) The Sturm rematch isn't going to happen?
and 2) Macklin will fight the winner of Martinez vs Barker?
1) More than likely.
2) Probably, unless Andy Lee gets in there first.

Potential "eliminator" between Lee and Macklin, assuming Lee gets past Vera and Macklin gets past whoever in November.
Thanks for the answers. Lee vs Macklin would be a good fight.
gobbles
Heavyweight
Heavyweight
Posts: 2682
Joined: 18 Dec 2003, 15:04

Re: Macklin signs for DiBella

Post by gobbles »

jonlcfc1 wrote:
Josh1111 wrote:
Jon Saxon wrote: Agreed,
Sturm Ko's Mathew in a rematch.
Agree, Sturm knows what to expect now so will win the rematch quite easily

Of course, by the same token, Macklin knows what to expect and could therefore win the rematch.
Not really. He made his name in the first fight, lots of people thought he won. Thus he is no longer in need of taking a terrible deal, going to Sturm's home city and giving up three options.

If he wins the rematch, Sturm could force him into 3 more rematches as Felix Sturm Promotions only promotes 2 boxers, the other one being a heavyweight.
lurkyshaka
Heavyweight
Heavyweight
Posts: 569
Joined: 31 Jul 2005, 13:19

Re: Macklin signs for DiBella

Post by lurkyshaka »

Mackling has a right to explore his promotional options and if Dibella was offering something juicy then why not......the bigger concern is his corner team, is Macklin still with Gallagher?
Josh1111
Cruiserweight
Posts: 874
Joined: 02 Sep 2010, 05:50

Re: Macklin signs for DiBella

Post by Josh1111 »

gobbles wrote:
jonlcfc1 wrote:
Josh1111 wrote: Agree, Sturm knows what to expect now so will win the rematch quite easily

Of course, by the same token, Macklin knows what to expect and could therefore win the rematch.
Not really. He made his name in the first fight, lots of people thought he won. Thus he is no longer in need of taking a terrible deal, going to Sturm's home city and giving up three options.

If he wins the rematch, Sturm could force him into 3 more rematches as Felix Sturm Promotions only promotes 2 boxers, the other one being a heavyweight.
But no disrespect to Macklin as i had him winning the first fight by 2 rounds, but a re-match with Sturm could be the only other chance he gets at a world title shot. And the fact he'd turn that down for more money to me would be pretty bad.

Surely if you're the challenger and have a chance to be world champion, then take the offer, beat the man and become champion. Then you can demand more for fights.

If he's that confident of beating him in the re-match, take the deal and bring the title home.
stevek3lly
Heavyweight
Heavyweight
Posts: 649
Joined: 14 Jul 2010, 14:56

Re: Macklin signs for DiBella

Post by stevek3lly »

King Geedorah wrote:It is a great deal for Macklin. I’ve often said that he looks like one of those sepia-tinged NY middleweights from a bygone era and have started a laidback campaign to have him done up like one for his next fight poster.

Go to Germany and sell your soul to rematch Sturm or have two outings in New York, one of them likely to be against the #1. Hmm.

DiBell can basically rotate his 160lbers for the next year and produce excellent fights.
I agree. It will be a shame he is not going for the rematch, but this will open up doors for him and hopefully some fights against some names.
gobbles
Heavyweight
Heavyweight
Posts: 2682
Joined: 18 Dec 2003, 15:04

Re: Macklin signs for DiBella

Post by gobbles »

Josh1111 wrote:
gobbles wrote:
jonlcfc1 wrote:
Of course, by the same token, Macklin knows what to expect and could therefore win the rematch.
Not really. He made his name in the first fight, lots of people thought he won. Thus he is no longer in need of taking a terrible deal, going to Sturm's home city and giving up three options.

If he wins the rematch, Sturm could force him into 3 more rematches as Felix Sturm Promotions only promotes 2 boxers, the other one being a heavyweight.
But no disrespect to Macklin as i had him winning the first fight by 2 rounds, but a re-match with Sturm could be the only other chance he gets at a world title shot. And the fact he'd turn that down for more money to me would be pretty bad.

Surely if you're the challenger and have a chance to be world champion, then take the offer, beat the man and become champion. Then you can demand more for fights.

If he's that confident of beating him in the re-match, take the deal and bring the title home.
Well, that wasn't his only offer. He has signed with DiBella on the promise of facing Martinez St Patrick's Day weekend at the Garden.
Contract with Sturm stipulated purses for rematches/options, so he was tied in for 2 years.

Apart from that, DiBella's probably given him a hefty signing on fee.

He took the risk by taking a title fight instead of a longterm deal with Warren or Golden Boy. Now that's paid off for him.
Dan Dares
Cruiserweight
Posts: 1582
Joined: 29 Nov 2010, 16:33

Re: Macklin signs for DiBella

Post by Dan Dares »

King Geedorah wrote:It is a great deal for Macklin. I’ve often said that he looks like one of those sepia-tinged NY middleweights from a bygone era and have started a laidback campaign to have him done up like one for his next fight poster.

Go to Germany and sell your soul to rematch Sturm or have two outings in New York, one of them likely to be against the #1. Hmm.

DiBell can basically rotate his 160lbers for the next year and produce excellent fights.
Yep. Smart move. The Irish-American thing can be capitalised upon too. You think Gallagher will remain training him?
Josh1111
Cruiserweight
Posts: 874
Joined: 02 Sep 2010, 05:50

Re: Macklin signs for DiBella

Post by Josh1111 »

gobbles wrote:
Josh1111 wrote:
gobbles wrote: Not really. He made his name in the first fight, lots of people thought he won. Thus he is no longer in need of taking a terrible deal, going to Sturm's home city and giving up three options.

If he wins the rematch, Sturm could force him into 3 more rematches as Felix Sturm Promotions only promotes 2 boxers, the other one being a heavyweight.
But no disrespect to Macklin as i had him winning the first fight by 2 rounds, but a re-match with Sturm could be the only other chance he gets at a world title shot. And the fact he'd turn that down for more money to me would be pretty bad.

Surely if you're the challenger and have a chance to be world champion, then take the offer, beat the man and become champion. Then you can demand more for fights.

If he's that confident of beating him in the re-match, take the deal and bring the title home.
Well, that wasn't his only offer. He has signed with DiBella on the promise of facing Martinez St Patrick's Day weekend at the Garden.
Contract with Sturm stipulated purses for rematches/options, so he was tied in for 2 years.

Apart from that, DiBella's probably given him a hefty signing on fee.

He took the risk by taking a title fight instead of a longterm deal with Warren or Golden Boy. Now that's paid off for him.
Surely Martinez has to beat Barker before that fight can be promised?? They'll all look a bit stupid if Barker can spring a suprise
gobbles
Heavyweight
Heavyweight
Posts: 2682
Joined: 18 Dec 2003, 15:04

Re: Macklin signs for DiBella

Post by gobbles »

Josh1111 wrote:
gobbles wrote:
Josh1111 wrote: But no disrespect to Macklin as i had him winning the first fight by 2 rounds, but a re-match with Sturm could be the only other chance he gets at a world title shot. And the fact he'd turn that down for more money to me would be pretty bad.

Surely if you're the challenger and have a chance to be world champion, then take the offer, beat the man and become champion. Then you can demand more for fights.

If he's that confident of beating him in the re-match, take the deal and bring the title home.
Well, that wasn't his only offer. He has signed with DiBella on the promise of facing Martinez St Patrick's Day weekend at the Garden.
Contract with Sturm stipulated purses for rematches/options, so he was tied in for 2 years.

Apart from that, DiBella's probably given him a hefty signing on fee.

He took the risk by taking a title fight instead of a longterm deal with Warren or Golden Boy. Now that's paid off for him.
Surely Martinez has to beat Barker before that fight can be promised?? They'll all look a bit stupid if Barker can spring a suprise

Barker won't spring a surprise. Open secret that his hip's not right, that's why he is going straight for Martinez rather than the original plan of "keep busy".
But DiBella will have options on Barker anyway.
Autobarn
Heavyweight
Heavyweight
Posts: 16093
Joined: 05 Jul 2005, 13:01

Re: Macklin signs for DiBella

Post by Autobarn »

well dibella needs opponents for martinez - that's no secret.

all they can make for him is high risk, low reward (relative to his talents) fights for the most. lee sells tickets on the martinez undercard/s, but hasn't looked to be of high enough calibre, as yet (despite pulling out the mcewan win in exciting fashion).

and it is good that macklin has options away from sturm and germany, something i wondered aloud about on here (i thought perhaps he'd end up vs pavlik).

hope macklin-winky doesn't come round again. winky is trying for the comeback, again, it seems. dibella does seem to like the middleweights, which used to be arum territory (hagler, mcallum, toney>pavlik).

i figured martinez would be fighting erislandy lara soon, if lara gets another reputation-making fight. probably lara-molina 2 with the winner to fight sergio - that's the way it was looking, and while a good matchup, not the glamour fight that a good left hook and a pair of green shorts can bring!
Post Reply