Pryor - Taylor

Pryor - Taylor

Pryor
18
86%
Taylor
3
14%
Too close to call
0
No votes
 
Total votes: 21

Ezzard
Heavyweight
Heavyweight
Posts: 11172
Joined: 12 May 2005, 09:20

Pryor - Taylor

Post by Ezzard »

I'd pick Taylor by wide decision (Pryor losing too many 10-8 rounds as he'd get dropped multiple times) or Taylor to end it late.

Many osters seem to be ranking Pryor as a better fighter in threads and I think they are wrong.

Taylor was better but he was matched hard and above his weight too many times. Pryor was matched far easier though he did move up from 135.
Crease
Heavyweight
Heavyweight
Posts: 16865
Joined: 13 Oct 2005, 10:19

Re: Pryor - Taylor

Post by Crease »

Pryor by UD.
Goodnight, Irene
Heavyweight
Heavyweight
Posts: 9463
Joined: 24 Sep 2007, 04:43

Re: Pryor - Taylor

Post by Goodnight, Irene »

I went with Pryor & Id be fairly confident.

I agree with you though, Ezz, that Pryor generally gets over-estimated --- thing is, so does Taylor.
elmersalsa
Heavyweight
Heavyweight
Posts: 15660
Joined: 02 Feb 2003, 03:50

Re: Pryor - Taylor

Post by elmersalsa »

Their styles seem to be very similar. Aaron Pryor had better punching power and stamina, but Meldrick Taylor was faster and better inside fighter. Both of them were complete fighters. Their careers were too short. Too bad.

I pick Pryor by late TKO a la Arguello I
tennessee
Heavyweight
Heavyweight
Posts: 350
Joined: 16 Sep 2004, 23:32

Re: Pryor - Taylor

Post by tennessee »

without Panama Lewis in the Pryor corner i would have to pick Taylor. Just too big too fast.
dempseyfire
Heavyweight
Heavyweight
Posts: 5534
Joined: 29 Oct 2003, 22:56

Re: Pryor - Taylor

Post by dempseyfire »

Ezzard wrote:I'd pick Taylor by wide decision (Pryor losing too many 10-8 rounds as he'd get dropped multiple times) or Taylor to end it late.

Many osters seem to be ranking Pryor as a better fighter in threads and I think they are wrong.

Taylor was better but he was matched hard and above his weight too many times. Pryor was matched far easier though he did move up from 135.
'was matched far easier'?? Not sure what you mean . . I'll take Pryor's best opponents (Cervantes, Johnson, Arguello) to be on par with the best Meldrick fought (Chavez, Norris, McGirt)

Pryor by KO
LeedsLad
Cruiserweight
Posts: 996
Joined: 02 Jul 2010, 06:15

Re: Pryor - Taylor

Post by LeedsLad »

Pryor would knock him out.
King Carlos
Heavyweight
Heavyweight
Posts: 1123
Joined: 11 May 2010, 19:10

Re: Pryor - Taylor

Post by King Carlos »

Ezzard wrote:I'd pick Taylor by wide decision (Pryor losing too many 10-8 rounds as he'd get dropped multiple times) or Taylor to end it late.
That is just ridiculous.
BoxBuzz
Heavyweight
Heavyweight
Posts: 29847
Joined: 07 Jun 2005, 16:37

Re: Pryor - Taylor

Post by BoxBuzz »

One of these is one of the most if not THE most over rated entity boxing has ever known

And the other fella would win this fight
King Carlos
Heavyweight
Heavyweight
Posts: 1123
Joined: 11 May 2010, 19:10

Re: Pryor - Taylor

Post by King Carlos »

BoxBuzz wrote:One of these is one of the most if not THE most over rated entity boxing has ever known

And the other fella would win this fight
Both are overrated, but I'd assume Pryor is the one you're thinking. I'd agree that his greatness gets massively overrated by some, but he'd still dog the shit out of Taylor.
Goodnight, Irene
Heavyweight
Heavyweight
Posts: 9463
Joined: 24 Sep 2007, 04:43

Re: Pryor - Taylor

Post by Goodnight, Irene »

Im quite sure Pryor would win, but you cant tell me Taylor wouldnt be competitive.

Nobody who does that to Chavez (IMO, a better fighter than Pryor, though perhaps a little more stylistically vulnerable to Taylor) would just roll over for Pryor.

I do concur both get too much credit.
SaadOffTheDeck
Heavyweight
Heavyweight
Posts: 19602
Joined: 04 Jun 2009, 07:38

Re: Pryor - Taylor

Post by SaadOffTheDeck »

Goodnight, Irene wrote:I went with Pryor & Id be fairly confident.

I agree with you though, Ezz, that Pryor generally gets over-estimated --- thing is, so does Taylor.
:TU:

It's the consensus at 140, Pryor was unbeatable.....

And guys like Loi & Locche barely get a mention.
elmersalsa
Heavyweight
Heavyweight
Posts: 15660
Joined: 02 Feb 2003, 03:50

Re: Pryor - Taylor

Post by elmersalsa »

The great Aaron Pryor was a special fighter. A complete fighter. Meldrick Taylor was a complete fighter, too. He showed it in the first Julio Cesar Chavez fight. He fought brilliantly. But he chose to go toe to toe in the last minute of that magnificent fight, and paid the price.
jaclem2
Heavyweight
Heavyweight
Posts: 551
Joined: 09 Dec 2008, 17:42

Re: Pryor - Taylor

Post by jaclem2 »

...buzz....once again i owe you one... :TU:
BoxBuzz
Heavyweight
Heavyweight
Posts: 29847
Joined: 07 Jun 2005, 16:37

Re: Pryor - Taylor

Post by BoxBuzz »

elmersalsa wrote:The great Aaron Pryor was a special fighter. A complete fighter. Meldrick Taylor was a complete fighter, too. He showed it in the first Julio Cesar Chavez fight. He fought brilliantly. But he chose to go toe to toe in the last minute of that magnificent fight, and paid the price.

elmer....I'll go along with "special".......but the rest of this? Aye yi yi yi! If you were Lucy, you'd have some esplainin' to do.
gilgamesh
Cruiserweight
Posts: 46283
Joined: 02 Sep 2010, 16:21

Re: Pryor - Taylor

Post by gilgamesh »

Pryor KO 10 in a wonderfully entertaining fight.
TBooze
Light Heavyweight
Posts: 22
Joined: 22 Aug 2011, 11:55

Re: Pryor - Taylor

Post by TBooze »

I see Pryor coming from behind, to get to the mentally fragile Taylor late.

Pryor TKO14
SaadOffTheDeck
Heavyweight
Heavyweight
Posts: 19602
Joined: 04 Jun 2009, 07:38

Re: Pryor - Taylor

Post by SaadOffTheDeck »

Mentally fragile? LOL, the things you read on message boards. Meldrick let his balls get in the way of his brains against Chavez. But there wasn't a damn thing fragile about him.
Goodnight, Irene
Heavyweight
Heavyweight
Posts: 9463
Joined: 24 Sep 2007, 04:43

Re: Pryor - Taylor

Post by Goodnight, Irene »

Agree with Saad there.
TBooze
Light Heavyweight
Posts: 22
Joined: 22 Aug 2011, 11:55

Re: Pryor - Taylor

Post by TBooze »

SaadOffTheDeck wrote:Mentally fragile? LOL, the things you read on message boards. Meldrick let his balls get in the way of his brains against Chavez. But there wasn't a damn thing fragile about him.
He bottled the biggest fight of his career! Yes he was badly hurt, and he was fighting a great, but when it came down to it, Chavez found a way to win, Taylor had the fight at his mercy and blew it.

But to be fair, that is only one fight, but from that moment on, it was down hill for Taylor, I was there the night he was destroyed by Espana, it was a sad sight. But even prior to that, he took on Norris; OK the money must of been good, but surely Taylor must of had something up his sleeve, to believe he could win?

I figured pre fight, Norris would blow him out, and that is what happened (granted not exactly a hard call :DD ). When the big fights came, Taylor always found a way to lose.

Taylor was an incredible athlete, with amazing handspeed, but he just was not a smart boxer, and had a mental blockage when it came to the big fights...
Ambling Alp
Heavyweight
Heavyweight
Posts: 3627
Joined: 15 Jul 2005, 22:31

Re: Pryor - Taylor

Post by Ambling Alp »

In general Pryor may be slightly overrated. On the BOTP forum, he is one of the most overly criticized fighters. His competition wasn't the best, but he was a great fighter. Taylor at his best would have been a great fight.
Diamond WEAPON
Heavyweight
Heavyweight
Posts: 1729
Joined: 19 Nov 2006, 01:32

Re: Pryor - Taylor

Post by Diamond WEAPON »

Meldrick didn't "bottle" anything, Chavez went in there and turned his insides into taco meat and Taylor's body was done by the end of that fight, he still never stopped trying to buckle Julio with all he had.
SaadOffTheDeck
Heavyweight
Heavyweight
Posts: 19602
Joined: 04 Jun 2009, 07:38

Re: Pryor - Taylor

Post by SaadOffTheDeck »

TBooze wrote:
SaadOffTheDeck wrote:Mentally fragile? LOL, the things you read on message boards. Meldrick let his balls get in the way of his brains against Chavez. But there wasn't a damn thing fragile about him.
He bottled the biggest fight of his career! Yes he was badly hurt, and he was fighting a great, but when it came down to it, Chavez found a way to win, Taylor had the fight at his mercy and blew it.

But to be fair, that is only one fight, but from that moment on, it was down hill for Taylor, I was there the night he was destroyed by Espana, it was a sad sight. But even prior to that, he took on Norris; OK the money must of been good, but surely Taylor must of had something up his sleeve, to believe he could win?

I figured pre fight, Norris would blow him out, and that is what happened (granted not exactly a hard call :DD ). When the big fights came, Taylor always found a way to lose.

Taylor was an incredible athlete, with amazing handspeed, but he just was not a smart boxer, and had a mental blockage when it came to the big fights...
In the biggest fight of his life he was well ahead of an all time great and then many of us think he got screwed.

As for Terry Norris, losing to a bigger, better fighter is a mental "blockage". Did Nino benvenutti mentally choke against Carlos Monzon?

C'mon man, this is ridiculous. His prime wasn't long and he liked to slug more than box. But none of that is being mentally weak. And his second biggest fight was probably beating the crap out of Buddy McGirt.

And if the fight the OP presented is 12 rounds, you just predicted the mentally fragile taylor to beat Aaron Pryor. How did you come to that conclusion?
Goodnight, Irene
Heavyweight
Heavyweight
Posts: 9463
Joined: 24 Sep 2007, 04:43

Re: Pryor - Taylor

Post by Goodnight, Irene »

Taylor fucken shone against McGirt. He was outstanding that night.
Ezzard
Heavyweight
Heavyweight
Posts: 11172
Joined: 12 May 2005, 09:20

Re: Pryor - Taylor

Post by Ezzard »

I think Taylor was exceptional. He should never have fought Norris. Terrible decision.
Post Reply