Warren signs Groves

gobbles
Heavyweight
Heavyweight
Posts: 2682
Joined: 18 Dec 2003, 15:04

Warren signs Groves

Post by gobbles »

That shocked me!
Tommy Gunn13
Heavyweight
Heavyweight
Posts: 3290
Joined: 10 Nov 2008, 13:11

Re: Warren signs Groves

Post by Tommy Gunn13 »

Same here :o
boxingchat
Heavyweight
Heavyweight
Posts: 1934
Joined: 12 Aug 2005, 05:26

Re: Warren signs Groves

Post by boxingchat »

And me too :wink:
Craig14
Heavyweight
Heavyweight
Posts: 2933
Joined: 17 Jun 2010, 12:25

Re: Warren signs Groves

Post by Craig14 »

I wonder if Mr Warren and Adam Booth have made peace then?
Tommy Gunn13
Heavyweight
Heavyweight
Posts: 3290
Joined: 10 Nov 2008, 13:11

Re: Warren signs Groves

Post by Tommy Gunn13 »

boxingchat wrote:And me too :wink:
Yeah Yeah :lol:
Counter-puncher
Heavyweight
Heavyweight
Posts: 39141
Joined: 20 May 2008, 11:41

Re: Warren signs Groves

Post by Counter-puncher »

boxingchat wrote:And me too :wink:

:lol:
Glyn Leach
Heavyweight
Heavyweight
Posts: 2135
Joined: 25 Dec 2007, 14:08

Re: Warren signs Groves

Post by Glyn Leach »

Counter-puncher wrote:
boxingchat wrote:And me too :wink:

:lol:
Well well! Eddie was very confident about that one, was wondering why George wasn't at the Monday presser as advertised. Might this facilitate Groves-DeGale II? Neither of them can make as much money by fighting anyone else
Bard of Boxrec
Heavyweight
Heavyweight
Posts: 13114
Joined: 22 Feb 2002, 20:00

Re: Warren signs Groves

Post by Bard of Boxrec »

why would he put two stablemates in with each other? Plus Groves said he is done with DeGale until this mythical 'Superfight down the line' that everyone wrongly perceives as going to happen.
addi
Heavyweight
Heavyweight

Re: Warren signs Groves

Post by addi »

Riddick Blowe wrote:why would he put two stablemates in with each other? Plus Groves said he is done with DeGale until this mythical 'Superfight down the line' that everyone wrongly perceives as going to happen.
he put mitchell and murry in together.
Tommy Gunn13
Heavyweight
Heavyweight
Posts: 3290
Joined: 10 Nov 2008, 13:11

Re: Warren signs Groves

Post by Tommy Gunn13 »

Riddick Blowe wrote:why would he put two stablemates in with each other? Plus Groves said he is done with DeGale until this mythical 'Superfight down the line' that everyone wrongly perceives as going to happen.
Why? because down the line it will be worth plenty of £££££
dondada
Heavyweight
Heavyweight
Posts: 8872
Joined: 26 Nov 2003, 10:55

Re: Warren signs Groves

Post by dondada »

Putting stablemates together is probably the way forward for some promoters.

Means that you have the winner whatever happens. Why risk your man against someone else's if you don't have to?
Camcas
Cruiserweight
Posts: 881
Joined: 12 Sep 2010, 14:18

Re: Warren signs Groves

Post by Camcas »

Very odd decision this is, not sure why Groves has done this
DougieC30
Heavyweight
Heavyweight
Posts: 586
Joined: 20 Dec 2009, 15:00

Re: Warren signs Groves

Post by DougieC30 »

Didn't see that coming. Good move for all involved
JamesH
Heavyweight
Heavyweight
Posts: 1897
Joined: 08 Aug 2008, 09:16

Re: Warren signs Groves

Post by JamesH »

addi wrote:
Riddick Blowe wrote:why would he put two stablemates in with each other? Plus Groves said he is done with DeGale until this mythical 'Superfight down the line' that everyone wrongly perceives as going to happen.
he put mitchell and murry in together.
And De Gale-Smith.

Shocked by this though. Warren said Groves should be ashamed of himself if he didn't take a rematch with De Gale, interesting to see when that will happen now. It does seem like a win-win move for all concerned.
stevek3lly
Heavyweight
Heavyweight
Posts: 649
Joined: 14 Jul 2010, 14:56

Re: Warren signs Groves

Post by stevek3lly »

This came out of blue. All the talk was for him to join Matchroom. Really surprised by this.
JC
Heavyweight
Heavyweight
Posts: 4578
Joined: 07 Jan 2004, 13:04

Re: Warren signs Groves

Post by JC »

I guess it makes sense for FW to pull out some stops to get Groves. Both to slow down the Matchroom momentum a bit and make any future Groves/Degale a win/win.
JamesH
Heavyweight
Heavyweight
Posts: 1897
Joined: 08 Aug 2008, 09:16

Re: Warren signs Groves

Post by JamesH »

MachoMan09 wrote:
Camcas wrote:Very odd decision this is, not sure why Groves has done this
Perhaps he looked at the offers on the table and chose the best one?

I agree it was probably the best offer.

What I do find a little confusing is the adamant nature in which Haye avoided Warren for years. Haye went out of his way to not get signed into a long term agreement and have his career 'controlled' by Warren. I have actually got a ton of quotes from Haye 4 or 5 years ago explaining why he wouldn't join Warren - although most of it was cut from the published piece (surprise, surprise).

I don't really know what it means. Whether Haye/Booth were more confident in Haye than Groves? Perhaps more confident in his ability to sell a fight? Whether the division is stronger and they need the contacts/bargaining power Warren brings? Whether it's a case of them learning their lesson from Hayes career and not wanting to invest as much in Groves?

As I say, I don't know, buts it's a fascinating move all round!
Counter-puncher
Heavyweight
Heavyweight
Posts: 39141
Joined: 20 May 2008, 11:41

Re: Warren signs Groves

Post by Counter-puncher »

MachoMan09 wrote:
Camcas wrote:Very odd decision this is, not sure why Groves has done this
Perhaps he looked at the offers on the table and chose the best one?

hell's bells man, what kind of depraved weirdness are you advocating, here?
stujones
Heavyweight
Heavyweight
Posts: 27513
Joined: 29 Aug 2003, 15:08

Re: Warren signs Groves

Post by stujones »

JamesH wrote:
addi wrote:
Riddick Blowe wrote:why would he put two stablemates in with each other? Plus Groves said he is done with DeGale until this mythical 'Superfight down the line' that everyone wrongly perceives as going to happen.
he put mitchell and murry in together.
And De Gale-Smith.

Shocked by this though. Warren said Groves should be ashamed of himself if he didn't take a rematch with De Gale, interesting to see when that will happen now. It does seem like a win-win move for all concerned.
It is encouraging to see the best fighters domestically pitted together, even if they are promoted by the same guy (Jennings vs Brook is another one).

However, I think the closness of Groves vs Degale has kind of disguised the fact that as a fact goes it was a stinker. The PPV turned into a bit of a disaster with the Cleverley situation and cannot see the same interest in a rematch yet.

I know it was discussed in the previous thread, but does this mean the end of Hayemaker? Basically Adam is admitting that Hayemaker cannot get him the deals that Warren is offering.
tobyh5
Heavyweight
Heavyweight
Posts: 2880
Joined: 09 Jan 2008, 07:07

Re: Warren signs Groves

Post by tobyh5 »

What great news, I look forward to seeing George contest a minor belt and then defend it against a bunch on nobodies.

FML!
Newport Daz
Cruiserweight
Posts: 687
Joined: 31 Aug 2010, 07:26

Re: Warren signs Groves

Post by Newport Daz »

From what i've read Hayemaker don't seem to be overly popular with other promoters in this country and Europe. It seems their arrogant, heavy handed approach has burned a few bridges. Groves is probably aware of this too and the deal with Frank W opens the most doors. Perosnally I think it's a good move for him. Look at Degale, he lost the fight but has bounced back with a big fight immediatly while George has little going on.
MightyWarrior
Heavyweight
Heavyweight
Posts: 13318
Joined: 23 Jan 2003, 14:01

Re: Warren signs Groves

Post by MightyWarrior »

Big surprise. But the way FW moved DeGale straight into a Euro shot, on the back of his first loss, must have impressed Groves and Booth. And also the way he rebuilt Khan...it's an impressive track record.

Eddie says, over at boxing news, that the fact golden boy had world wide rights on Groves, put a spanner in the works.
zero
Cruiserweight
Posts: 439
Joined: 16 Aug 2011, 16:30

Re: Warren signs Groves

Post by zero »

IMO Groves has made a big mistake here he will play second fiddle to DeGale. He would have been better joining Matchroom and learning from Froch. Warren will likely build him up for a rematch with DeGale, and then drop him like a stone.
Finch
Heavyweight
Heavyweight
Posts: 1129
Joined: 01 Mar 2008, 08:14

Re: Warren signs Groves

Post by Finch »

zero wrote:IMO Groves has made a big mistake here he will play second fiddle to DeGale. He would have been better joining Matchroom and learning from Froch. Warren will likely build him up for a rematch with DeGale, and then drop him like a stone.
Yep, Warren's baby is DeGale. He won't give two shits about Gropves but will use him to extract cash, then when Groves doesn't perform, drop him, or even sacrifice him at will.
Camcas
Cruiserweight
Posts: 881
Joined: 12 Sep 2010, 14:18

Re: Warren signs Groves

Post by Camcas »

MachoMan09 wrote:
Camcas wrote:Very odd decision this is, not sure why Groves has done this
Perhaps he looked at the offers on the table and chose the best one?
If its just about money then yes, however boxing terms this move could very well turn out to be the wrong one
Post Reply