Greetings From Bolton ... Films, News, Gossip.

stepper · Post by **stepper** » 15 Jul 2005, 05:06

Hello from Bolton, once again http://www.frankmaloney.com will be bringing you all the news and gossip as films on the site. Watch this thread.

Film: "Bolton 15/07/05"
This is film of yesterdays press conference, exactly how annoyed is allegedly that Danny missed a telephone conference and missed yesterdays presser?
Hear the first commens from Amir and Matt.
Watch exclusive pictures of the new Bolton pitch being layed.

We will be bringing you weigh-in footage and more background film in the next few days.

jamesmcdonnell · Post by **jamesmcdonnell** » 15 Jul 2005, 05:21

any news on the proposed boxrec/doghouse meetup with Maloney do you know?

pasty_spud · Post by **pasty_spud** » 15 Jul 2005, 05:50

"exclusive pictures of boltons new pitch being layed"?????

1. whoopdee fornicating do...

2. why the hell do bolton need a new pitch??? they never play the ball along the turf anyway!!!!!!

stepper · Post by **stepper** » 15 Jul 2005, 12:56

Friday 15th July, later this evening film of todays weigh-in will be posted.
Questions;
Was Danny Williams really 20 stone?
Was the head to head press shot a little angry?
Did Amir look confident when meeting David Bailey?
What did Jim McDonnell (fellow poster) have to say about Dannys no-show yesterday?
How confident is Kevin Sanders?
Watch the film and you decide.

No shots of Boltons new pitch today and no news on the "round table" discussions. I shall make enquiries tonight and post the answer asap.

stujones · Post by **stujones** » 15 Jul 2005, 18:55

stepper wrote: What did Jim McDonnell (fellow poster) have to say about Dannys no-.

What is his posting name? Common mistake if you think it is boxrec's #1 poster.

Well, at least I believe it is.

kevin · Post by **kevin** » 15 Jul 2005, 19:01

Yes it is two different people

stepper · Post by **stepper** » 17 Jul 2005, 19:09

Last post from me on the Bolton Promotion and a great new film called "Bolton Round Up" at the top of the FREE movies list on http://www.frankmaloney.com

Film includes;

allegedly on Audley Harrison.
On Danny Williams pull out of the fight see, a selection of fans (pretty annoyed) Kevin Sanders (pissed off) Eugene Maloney (very pissed off).
Interviews with Ricky Hatton and Billy "The Preacher" Graham.

Watch as the camera is allowed into the dressing room of Matt Skelton, David Bailey and Craig Watson for unrestricted pre and post fight filming. I felt honoured to be allowed this access to the fighters at these critical hours of their fight preparation and I think as you see each fighter taping and gloving up moments before walking out to the ring you'll appreciate how much this sport means to them and how much is at stake for them.

My sincere thanks to everyone involved for their professionalism and generosity in allowing me to make this film.

stepper · Post by **stepper** » 18 Jul 2005, 07:38

I notice that on two of my posts on this thread alterations have been made. Where I have written "allegedly" someone has altered it to read "allegedly allegedly".

I realise the context of this running joke but I'm suprised to find it's compulsory. Is this not how Hitler started?

Coconut · Post by **Coconut** » 18 Jul 2005, 07:57

stepper wrote:I notice that on two of my posts on this thread alterations have been made. Where I have written "allegedly allegedly" someone has altered it to read "allegedly allegedly allegedly".

I realise the context of this running joke but I'm suprised to find it's compulsory. Is this not how Hitler started?

Hitler started out as a lowly soldier who convinced himself that the Jews were responsible for the outcome of the Great War. His conviction and personality enabled him to build sympathy amongst a German people crippled by post-War reparations and from there create a National Socialist movement which thrived in the atmosphere of bitterness and mistrust that was bubbling in that period. His actions precipitated the largest war ever known on earth.

This forum automatically prefixes FW's name with 'allegedly' because of the previously-evidenced watchfulness of the Sports Network legal department. This act hopefully prevents the owners of the forum getting into legal hot water with some lawyers for a sports promotions company.

stepper · Post by **stepper** » 18 Jul 2005, 19:34

The casual reader such as allegedly myself may read the letter from Mr. Warrens legal bods which sits proudly at the top of the threads and assume it to be factual. In fact it has been altered by your allegedly typing bot.

My view is that anything written in a published news journal, either in print or on the net should withstand legal scrutiny whereas anything written by everyone else on a messageboard should be seen as tittle tattle.

Maybe some explaination should be added to the letter at the top explaining that any mention of the name in full will be tampered with by the site and that the letter has also been altered.

Coconut · Post by **Coconut** » 19 Jul 2005, 03:25

That's nice, but is your view that of the SN legal department?

Still don't quite see the Hitler reference working...

stepper · Post by **stepper** » 19 Jul 2005, 08:07

It's my view.

The term "That's how Hitler started" is normally offered to challenge a piece of officialdom that oversteps the line between discussion and control. To suggest Hitler started by altering documents is pure folly.

jamesmcdonnell · Post by **jamesmcdonnell** » 19 Jul 2005, 08:23

stepper wrote:The casual reader such as allegedly myself may read the letter from Mr. Warrens legal bods which sits proudly at the top of the threads and assume it to be factual. In fact it has been altered by your allegedly typing bot.

My view is that anything written in a published news journal, either in print or on the net should withstand legal scrutiny whereas anything written by everyone else on a messageboard should be seen as tittle tattle.

Maybe some explaination should be added to the letter at the top explaining that any mention of the name in full will be tampered with by the site and that the letter has also been altered.

That may be your view, but it is not substantiated by the courts so it is irrelevant. The fact is, anything which is possibly construed as slanderous, libellous or otherwise defamatory, which is published by the owner of an internet bulletin board, is bound by exactly the same laws as is applicable to printor broadcast media. It may seem stupid, but that's the way it is, there was a test case in the UK some time ago.

As far as I am aware, the same laws do not apply in the states.

All you have to do is ignore the word allegedly, surely not too much to ask?

Old bones Ian · Post by **Old bones Ian** » 19 Jul 2005, 08:44

jamesmcdonnell wrote:
stepper wrote: All you have to do is ignore the word allegedly, surely not too much to ask?

I like the fact the word is added , as i can't spell aledgerdy