Steve Maxwell v.s John Akauola

Craig14
Heavyweight
Heavyweight
Posts: 2933
Joined: 17 Jun 2010, 12:25

Steve Maxwell v.s John Akauola

Post by Craig14 »

Wow what a fight, Akauola just wouldn't quit and just kept coming back - Great fight. Round 5 was an incredible round aswell. Maxwell looks a strong lad.
adnileb
Heavyweight
Heavyweight
Posts: 119
Joined: 28 Nov 2008, 11:23

Re: Steve Maxwell v.s John Akauola

Post by adnileb »

got a stream anyone for the fight?
Da Voice
Cruiserweight
Posts: 1092
Joined: 24 Dec 2010, 20:59

Re: Steve Maxwell v.s John Akauola

Post by Da Voice »

yid14 wrote:Wow what a fight, Akauola just wouldn't quit and just kept coming back - Great fight. Round 5 was an incredible round aswell. Maxwell looks a strong lad.
Standing 8 certainly assisted Akauola survival
#1 BoXa
Light Heavyweight
Posts: 216
Joined: 05 Aug 2011, 10:58

Re: Steve Maxwell v.s John Akauola

Post by #1 BoXa »

yeah turned out 2 be a great match maxwell is just relentless with his non stop punching , super John has good boxing skills i remember him in the amature days has always got good lateral evasive movement just sitts on the ropes 2 long.. good entertaining undercard :TU:
iron rhino
Heavyweight
Heavyweight
Posts: 252
Joined: 01 Sep 2008, 04:39

Re: Steve Maxwell v.s John Akauola

Post by iron rhino »

Fight of the night imo!!!Two evenly matched but completly different styles,akauola ran out of legs late but was competitive the entire fight,maxwell seemed the stronger physically.great fight and there should be another one!!
#1 BoXa
Light Heavyweight
Posts: 216
Joined: 05 Aug 2011, 10:58

Re: Steve Maxwell v.s John Akauola

Post by #1 BoXa »

yeah i agree with ya brother Iron Rhino U beast good lucck with ur challenge for the Aussie Strap :TU: Hope u win man :OhYes:
Brute
Heavyweight
Heavyweight
Posts: 6993
Joined: 03 Dec 2005, 03:05

Re: Steve Maxwell v.s John Akauola

Post by Brute »

Da Voice wrote:
yid14 wrote:Wow what a fight, Akauola just wouldn't quit and just kept coming back - Great fight. Round 5 was an incredible round aswell. Maxwell looks a strong lad.
Standing 8 certainly assisted Akauola survival
Do they allow a standing eight count in prelims?
Conc
Light Heavyweight
Posts: 7
Joined: 17 Aug 2011, 10:04

Re: Steve Maxwell v.s John Akauola

Post by Conc »

I was in maxwells change room when ref come in
Before fight to go over things. An he said NO standing 8 count.
So not sure why 8 count come into it
Da Voice
Cruiserweight
Posts: 1092
Joined: 24 Dec 2010, 20:59

Re: Steve Maxwell v.s John Akauola

Post by Da Voice »

Conc wrote:I was in maxwells change room when ref come in
Before fight to go over things. An he said NO standing 8 count.
So not sure why 8 count come into it
Brian McMahon is a NSW ref, where there's no standing 8, but fights were contested under Vic rules. I guess he found that out after he spoke with the guys.
kylamy
Heavyweight
Heavyweight
Posts: 269
Joined: 19 Feb 2010, 19:43

Re: Steve Maxwell v.s John Akauola

Post by kylamy »

Da Voice wrote:
Conc wrote:I was in maxwells change room when ref come in
Before fight to go over things. An he said NO standing 8 count.

So not sure why 8 count come into it
Brian McMahon is a NSW ref, where there's no standing 8, but fights were contested under Vic rules. I guess he found that out after he spoke with the guys.


Hi Guys, there is a Simple answer to this, I was assisting as Supervisor for the entire event, not just the PABA title fight, there was to be no standing 8 count, but another Referee earlier, used the standing 8 count even though he was told not to, so once it was used, we decided it had to be used in all the prelim bouts simple as that, it's not ideal i know and not correct, but you cannot have a standing 8 in one fight and not another, it's all or nothing, i would have preferred nothing.

In NSW they DO HAVE a Standing 8 count in there rules, and it is used often, I have used it in NSW, but not in Victoria, there is no standing 8 count, we had NSW officials and to confuse them even more, they used Victorian rules, as i said, one Referee earlier in the evening simply forgot or decided to ignore my instructions and used the standing 8, so I decided we would have to use the standing 8, for every prelim fight, which we did, I then warned that same Referee not to use the standing 8 in the PABA title fight, which he did not because it only went just under two rounds.

Hope this clear things up, the event was a terrific for boxing in general, the Maxwell v Akaoula was a terrific fight, as was the main event, Tasmania certainly came out in droves to support Gealey and his team, approx 5000 people were there and everyone left happy.

Terrible shame about the PABA title fight, in my humble opinion, the fight should've been allowed to proceed, The Referee should have given the corner every chance to repair the cut and keep their fighter in the contest, they had the best cutman in Australia in their corner, in Brian Wilmott, plus when you consider all what both Jamie and Serge went through to get there, they both deserve every opportunity to win the fight.

I truly felt the fight was far from over and Yannick, while beaten in both rounds, was not out of the fight at all, there was still another 10 rounds to go, 2 rounds does not win you a championship fight, but i really did feel for Jamie who is an absolutel professional and a true sportsman, he deserves every accolade given.

I am presently working on a rematch, but the referee, by the letter of the law, broke no rule and he is entitled to halt the fight whenever he feels its right and to protect the fighter's welfare, and that's what he did, whether we like it or not, but i just felt Pittman deserved more opportunity.

Anyway, once every thing is sorted out, i will get on here and let you all know the outcome.

Regards
Brad Vocale
D J Pawsey
Light Heavyweight
Posts: 207
Joined: 18 Jul 2011, 05:26

Re: Steve Maxwell v.s John Akauola

Post by D J Pawsey »

Thanks brad always thought nsw had a standing 8 count rule.
Da Voice
Cruiserweight
Posts: 1092
Joined: 24 Dec 2010, 20:59

Re: Steve Maxwell v.s John Akauola

Post by Da Voice »

kylamy wrote:
Da Voice wrote:
Conc wrote:I was in maxwells change room when ref come in
Before fight to go over things. An he said NO standing 8 count.

So not sure why 8 count come into it
Brian McMahon is a NSW ref, where there's no standing 8, but fights were contested under Vic rules. I guess he found that out after he spoke with the guys.


Hi Guys, there is a Simple answer to this, I was assisting as Supervisor for the entire event, not just the PABA title fight, there was to be no standing 8 count, but another Referee earlier, used the standing 8 count even though he was told not to, so once it was used, we decided it had to be used in all the prelim bouts simple as that, it's not ideal i know and not correct, but you cannot have a standing 8 in one fight and not another, it's all or nothing, i would have preferred nothing.

In NSW they DO HAVE a Standing 8 count in there rules, and it is used often, I have used it in NSW, but not in Victoria, there is no standing 8 count, we had NSW officials and to confuse them even more, they used Victorian rules, as i said, one Referee earlier in the evening simply forgot or decided to ignore my instructions and used the standing 8, so I decided we would have to use the standing 8, for every prelim fight, which we did, I then warned that same Referee not to use the standing 8 in the PABA title fight, which he did not because it only went just under two rounds.

Hope this clear things up, the event was a terrific for boxing in general, the Maxwell v Akaoula was a terrific fight, as was the main event, Tasmania certainly came out in droves to support Gealey and his team, approx 5000 people were there and everyone left happy.

Terrible shame about the PABA title fight, in my humble opinion, the fight should've been allowed to proceed, The Referee should have given the corner every chance to repair the cut and keep their fighter in the contest, they had the best cutman in Australia in their corner, in Brian Wilmott, plus when you consider all what both Jamie and Serge went through to get there, they both deserve every opportunity to win the fight.

I truly felt the fight was far from over and Yannick, while beaten in both rounds, was not out of the fight at all, there was still another 10 rounds to go, 2 rounds does not win you a championship fight, but i really did feel for Jamie who is an absolutel professional and a true sportsman, he deserves every accolade given.

I am presently working on a rematch, but the referee, by the letter of the law, broke no rule and he is entitled to halt the fight whenever he feels its right and to protect the fighter's welfare, and that's what he did, whether we like it or not, but i just felt Pittman deserved more opportunity.

Anyway, once every thing is sorted out, i will get on here and let you all know the outcome.

Regards
Brad Vocale
Excellent post BV. There's nothing like a bit of self importance plug.....and why explain something in 10 words when one can do it in 100+ :lol:

It appears chief Sharpe & assistant you had your finger on the pulse.........Maybe touch busy socialising with IBF junket boys?? :lol: :lol: :lol:
Last edited by Da Voice on 03 Sep 2011, 12:09, edited 2 times in total.
#1 BoXa
Light Heavyweight
Posts: 216
Joined: 05 Aug 2011, 10:58

Re: Steve Maxwell v.s John Akauola

Post by #1 BoXa »

totally agree with ya Brad :TU:
'Frilla
Heavyweight
Heavyweight
Posts: 2716
Joined: 27 Jul 2009, 07:39

Re: Steve Maxwell v.s John Akauola

Post by 'Frilla »

Was an awesome fight! Both fighters gave it their all.

I remember John back in the amateurs, he has a twin brother, Luke. They were both very good amateur fighters.
Da Voice
Cruiserweight
Posts: 1092
Joined: 24 Dec 2010, 20:59

Re: Steve Maxwell v.s John Akauola

Post by Da Voice »

I was assisting as Supervisor for the entire event, not just the PABA title fight,
Is that so Bradley? It's unfortunate I know different :P
Giancarlo
Cruiserweight
Posts: 2316
Joined: 23 Feb 2011, 15:32

Re: Steve Maxwell v.s John Akauola

Post by Giancarlo »

Da Voice wrote:
Conc wrote:I was in maxwells change room when ref come in
Before fight to go over things. An he said NO standing 8 count.
So not sure why 8 count come into it
Brian McMahon is a NSW ref, where there's no standing 8, but fights were contested under Vic rules. I guess he found that out after he spoke with the guys.
Brad says they do have a standing 8 count in NSW.

Which one of you is right?
D J Pawsey
Light Heavyweight
Posts: 207
Joined: 18 Jul 2011, 05:26

Re: Steve Maxwell v.s John Akauola

Post by D J Pawsey »

Nsw has a standing 8 count I've been involved in 3 fights where it's been used.
Da Voice
Cruiserweight
Posts: 1092
Joined: 24 Dec 2010, 20:59

Re: Steve Maxwell v.s John Akauola

Post by Da Voice »

I knew one of them didn't have it, but got the wrong one. However, just because first bout ref erred why did it have to apply to rest of the night? I'd say he most likely wasn't told.
Just as well timekeeper didn't go 10 seconds over in first round 'cos all other fights 1st round would have to been 190 seconds :lol:
Last edited by Da Voice on 04 Sep 2011, 23:25, edited 1 time in total.
Sweet P
Heavyweight
Heavyweight
Posts: 3669
Joined: 23 Mar 2003, 04:18

Re: Steve Maxwell v.s John Akauola

Post by Sweet P »

Giancarlo wrote:
Da Voice wrote:
Conc wrote:I was in maxwells change room when ref come in
Before fight to go over things. An he said NO standing 8 count.
So not sure why 8 count come into it
Brian McMahon is a NSW ref, where there's no standing 8, but fights were contested under Vic rules. I guess he found that out after he spoke with the guys.
Brad says they do have a standing 8 count in NSW.

Which one of you is right?
NSW has a standing 8 count, Victoria dosn't.
Sweet P
Heavyweight
Heavyweight
Posts: 3669
Joined: 23 Mar 2003, 04:18

Re: Steve Maxwell v.s John Akauola

Post by Sweet P »

kylamy wrote:
Da Voice wrote:
Conc wrote:I was in maxwells change room when ref come in
Before fight to go over things. An he said NO standing 8 count.

So not sure why 8 count come into it
Brian McMahon is a NSW ref, where there's no standing 8, but fights were contested under Vic rules. I guess he found that out after he spoke with the guys.


Hi Guys, there is a Simple answer to this, I was assisting as Supervisor for the entire event, not just the PABA title fight, there was to be no standing 8 count, but another Referee earlier, used the standing 8 count even though he was told not to, so once it was used, we decided it had to be used in all the prelim bouts simple as that, it's not ideal i know and not correct, but you cannot have a standing 8 in one fight and not another, it's all or nothing, i would have preferred nothing.

In NSW they DO HAVE a Standing 8 count in there rules, and it is used often, I have used it in NSW, but not in Victoria, there is no standing 8 count, we had NSW officials and to confuse them even more, they used Victorian rules, as i said, one Referee earlier in the evening simply forgot or decided to ignore my instructions and used the standing 8, so I decided we would have to use the standing 8, for every prelim fight, which we did, I then warned that same Referee not to use the standing 8 in the PABA title fight, which he did not because it only went just under two rounds.

Hope this clear things up, the event was a terrific for boxing in general, the Maxwell v Akaoula was a terrific fight, as was the main event, Tasmania certainly came out in droves to support Gealey and his team, approx 5000 people were there and everyone left happy.

Terrible shame about the PABA title fight, in my humble opinion, the fight should've been allowed to proceed, The Referee should have given the corner every chance to repair the cut and keep their fighter in the contest, they had the best cutman in Australia in their corner, in Brian Wilmott, plus when you consider all what both Jamie and Serge went through to get there, they both deserve every opportunity to win the fight.

I truly felt the fight was far from over and Yannick, while beaten in both rounds, was not out of the fight at all, there was still another 10 rounds to go, 2 rounds does not win you a championship fight, but i really did feel for Jamie who is an absolutel professional and a true sportsman, he deserves every accolade given.

I am presently working on a rematch, but the referee, by the letter of the law, broke no rule and he is entitled to halt the fight whenever he feels its right and to protect the fighter's welfare, and that's what he did, whether we like it or not, but i just felt Pittman deserved more opportunity.

Anyway, once every thing is sorted out, i will get on here and let you all know the outcome.

Regards
Brad Vocale
I think Pittmans corner should have been given a chance to work the cut, The fight would have developed into a really great fight in my opinion. Pittman often starts fast and i think the middle rounds would have been really interesting.
A rematch will be great to see and hopefully can be on Fox.
Giancarlo
Cruiserweight
Posts: 2316
Joined: 23 Feb 2011, 15:32

Re: Steve Maxwell v.s John Akauola

Post by Giancarlo »

ben k wrote:
Giancarlo wrote:
Da Voice wrote:Brian McMahon is a NSW ref, where there's no standing 8, but fights were contested under Vic rules. I guess he found that out after he spoke with the guys.
Brad says they do have a standing 8 count in NSW.

Which one of you is right?
NSW has a standing 8 count, Victoria dosn't.
Thanks for that.

I suspected Brad had got it right.
perfect jet
Heavyweight
Heavyweight
Posts: 183
Joined: 05 Aug 2007, 07:46

Re: Steve Maxwell v.s John Akauola

Post by perfect jet »

Re: pittman v yannick

The ref decided to ignore a professional opinion ( the doctor).

So why did he call on him to check pittmans cut in the first place?

The doctor said pittman was ok to fight on.
Da Voice
Cruiserweight
Posts: 1092
Joined: 24 Dec 2010, 20:59

Re: Steve Maxwell v.s John Akauola

Post by Da Voice »

perfect jet wrote:Re: pittman v yannick

The ref decided to ignore a professional opinion ( the doctor).

So why did he call on him to check pittmans cut in the first place?

The doctor said pittman was ok to fight on.
Ref, judges & supervisor had $$$$ on Yannick
Da Voice
Cruiserweight
Posts: 1092
Joined: 24 Dec 2010, 20:59

Re: Steve Maxwell v.s John Akauola

Post by Da Voice »

It appears all concerned had a top night in Tassie.
Can't wait for a show in Darwin, with WA supervisor and mixture of Vic, NSW & Qld officials.......not to mention a mixture of all rules :lol: :lol: :lol:
Craig14
Heavyweight
Heavyweight
Posts: 2933
Joined: 17 Jun 2010, 12:25

Re: Steve Maxwell v.s John Akauola

Post by Craig14 »

Da Voice wrote:
perfect jet wrote:Re: pittman v yannick

The ref decided to ignore a professional opinion ( the doctor).

So why did he call on him to check pittmans cut in the first place?

The doctor said pittman was ok to fight on.
Ref, judges & supervisor had $$$$ on Yannick
The cut was a very bad one and Pittman would of never lasted the 12 rounds. The first thing he did when it opened was look at the ref he knew he was in trouble.
Post Reply