Comments are classic - I take it many are from boxrec membersSWALSH wrote:He's done it again. Another pricelss prediction;
http://www.boxingnews24.com/2011/06/joh ... more-68676
The Scott Gilfoid tribute thread
Re: The Scott Gilfoid tribute thread
-
Glyn Leach
- Heavyweight

- Posts: 2135
- Joined: 25 Dec 2007, 14:08
Re: The Scott Gilfoid tribute thread
The Gilf!
![[icon_notworthy.gif] :bow:](./images/smilies/icon_notworthy.gif)
Re: The Scott Gilfoid tribute thread
Scott can you please pick wladimir klitschko in your preview
![[icon_notworthy.gif] :bow:](./images/smilies/icon_notworthy.gif)
Re: The Scott Gilfoid tribute thread
It appears we were all wrong - what he was trying to say is that Johnson was weightdrained and too old anyway, and the clips of the fight he's seen on youtube show that Froch was getting beat up by an old weightdrained guy:
http://www.boxingnews24.com/2011/06/fro ... ter-shots/
http://www.boxingnews24.com/2011/06/fro ... ter-shots/
Re: The Scott Gilfoid tribute thread
Amusing of you to think they have editorial standards.The Dark Destroyer wrote:What a great way to start a review of a fight:
'I must confess I still haven’t seen last Saturday’s Super Six semifinal fight between WBC super middleweight champion Carl Froch (28-1, 20 KO’s) and Glen Johnson (51-15-2, 35 KO’s), but I have seen some tasty clips of it and seen enough to give my two cents on the bout.'
They shouldn't be printing his opinion on a fight he hasn't seen.
Re: The Scott Gilfoid tribute thread
That's one of his best yet
So he gives Ward full credit for beating Abraham but takes credit away from Froch because Dirrell did it first
I'd say Froch did the best job of the three on Abraham, Dirrell and Ward were pretty close, I'd be tempted to say Ward because Dirrell was being worn down, was decked and may have been stopped in the last couple of rounds.
Though at least he didn't say ''brutally and embarrassingly KO'd'' like he sometimes does.
So he gives Ward full credit for beating Abraham but takes credit away from Froch because Dirrell did it first
I'd say Froch did the best job of the three on Abraham, Dirrell and Ward were pretty close, I'd be tempted to say Ward because Dirrell was being worn down, was decked and may have been stopped in the last couple of rounds.
Though at least he didn't say ''brutally and embarrassingly KO'd'' like he sometimes does.
-
DIRT SUGAR
- Heavyweight

- Posts: 1200
- Joined: 29 Aug 2003, 11:48
Re: The Scott Gilfoid tribute thread
Try the 'True fans of boxing' page on Facebook for a real laugh. Unbelievable that is. Guys on there think they are Eddie Futch reincarnated and if you don't agree with their rantings they ball you out, call you a homo and when you give them a half-decent retort they throw their toys out of the pram then block you!!! I baited one on there the other week and he went ape shit, got all LA ghetto on me when I gave it back (oh then he blocked me). Very funny!
-
Final round
- Cruiserweight
- Posts: 4911
- Joined: 20 Oct 2010, 17:02
Re: The Scott Gilfoid tribute thread
The mouthpiece of Gilfoid: BoxingNew24?King Geedorah wrote:Been interviewing people in the game for an article on websites. There's a lot of positive comments and in general people subtly criticise one or two sites. Guess which is the only site to have been named and shamed?
-
danconnollyeire
- Light Heavyweight
- Posts: 3576
- Joined: 24 May 2012, 10:31
-
MightyWarrior
- Heavyweight

- Posts: 13357
- Joined: 23 Jan 2003, 14:01
Re: The Scott Gilfoid tribute thread
The great Scott Gilfoid correctly predicts ( Again !! - he has never actually been wrong with 100% record.
( this has been proved by top scientists ) ).....a massacre for Bute.
http://www.boxingnews24.com/2012/05/but ... ore-116403
Then, while everyone was incorrectly assuming that Carl won, the Gilf proves how he actually lost, and he was right again -
http://www.boxingnews24.com/2012/05/but ... qualified/
( this has been proved by top scientists ) ).....a massacre for Bute.
http://www.boxingnews24.com/2012/05/but ... ore-116403
Then, while everyone was incorrectly assuming that Carl won, the Gilf proves how he actually lost, and he was right again -
http://www.boxingnews24.com/2012/05/but ... qualified/
Re: The Scott Gilfoid tribute thread
His trollbait is indeed impressive. Whoever 'he' is.
-
jameswilson
- Heavyweight

- Posts: 13495
- Joined: 08 Jan 2004, 18:01
Re: The Scott Gilfoid tribute thread
'I don’t know how they conduct fights in the UK, but around the rest of the world a fighter is disqualified when one of his team members steps foot in the ring while the fight is still underway.'
We've discussed this here haven't we and come up with several fights around the World that prove this not to be the case. Mayweather v Judah (Roger Mayweather jumping in to try and smack Judah after Judah's blatant fouling.)
We've discussed this here haven't we and come up with several fights around the World that prove this not to be the case. Mayweather v Judah (Roger Mayweather jumping in to try and smack Judah after Judah's blatant fouling.)
-
billy nelson
- Heavyweight

- Posts: 1966
- Joined: 12 Apr 2010, 12:49
Re: The Scott Gilfoid tribute thread
The man is a complete and utter DICK who knows very little about boxingdondada wrote:I feel a slight sense of guilt for introducing the forum to this writer.
For the uninitiated - and I sincerely hope that's most of you - he did a piece on how Froch looked scared in the preamble to the Abraham fight and was going to get battered. Then, despite being completely wrong, still managed to call Froch a load of rubbish in his write up.
Here's his latest:
http://www.boxingnews24.com/2010/11/kha ... a-on-1211/?
The best bit is in the third paragraph when he really starts to believe the sh1t he's shovelling 'This could be a lot easier knockout win for Maidana than I originally predicted' (two paragraphs before, presumably).
-
jtourettes
- Heavyweight

- Posts: 826
- Joined: 20 Feb 2009, 07:24
Re: The Scott Gilfoid tribute thread
Why would anyone continue to give this troll hits?
Re: The Scott Gilfoid tribute thread
Been away for a couple of days and haven't read the other threads about Hearn jumping in. Regardless, Hearn wasn't part of his corner and Froch wouldn't have been DQ'd for that...AFAIK.jameswilson wrote:'I don’t know how they conduct fights in the UK, but around the rest of the world a fighter is disqualified when one of his team members steps foot in the ring while the fight is still underway.'
We've discussed this here haven't we and come up with several fights around the World that prove this not to be the case. Mayweather v Judah (Roger Mayweather jumping in to try and smack Judah after Judah's blatant fouling.)
-
Roars Like Me
- Heavyweight

- Posts: 1763
- Joined: 14 Feb 2006, 10:43
Re: The Scott Gilfoid tribute thread
Ah bless him, I wouldn't be the same if he wasn't so predictable
http://www.boxingnews24.com/2012/05/but ... qualified/
http://www.boxingnews24.com/2012/05/but ... qualified/
Re: The Scott Gilfoid tribute thread
This is a little bit different to the rest of his stuff, actually. It's still a load of shite but usually it's based on his twisted opinions whereas this is based on a simple, factual inaccuracy.Roars Like Me wrote:Ah bless him, I wouldn't be the same if he wasn't so predictable![]()
![]()
http://www.boxingnews24.com/2012/05/but ... qualified/
Re: The Scott Gilfoid tribute thread
The most worrying part of the article for me is where is seems to imply that it is fine to use steroids for training, so long as they are out of your system by fight night. By all means, slate British fighters for the fun of it, but don't belittle steroid use
Obviously the rest is harmless, predictable, wind up merchant stuff
Obviously the rest is harmless, predictable, wind up merchant stuff
-
jameswilson
- Heavyweight

- Posts: 13495
- Joined: 08 Jan 2004, 18:01
Re: The Scott Gilfoid tribute thread
The comments underneath are hilarious.The Dark Destroyer wrote:http://www.boxingnews24.com/2012/05/fro ... over-bute/
Re: The Scott Gilfoid tribute thread
Why would anyone debate the 'writing'of Scott Gifoid????..... talk about dumbing down.
-
jameswilson
- Heavyweight

- Posts: 13495
- Joined: 08 Jan 2004, 18:01
Re: The Scott Gilfoid tribute thread
He surely can't get paid for that shite?
Re: The Scott Gilfoid tribute thread
The Dark Destroyer wrote:http://www.boxingnews24.com/2012/05/but ... a-rematch/
http://www.boxingnews24.com/2012/05/fro ... r-168-lbs/
He's really got it in for Froch, this loss seems to have personally hurt him.
Excellent journalism.Gilfoid wrote:As you can see, my choices are sound picks and arguably much, much better than the Ring’s choices.
Re: The Scott Gilfoid tribute thread
An Englishman must have ran off with his girlfriend.
Re: The Scott Gilfoid tribute thread
Mikkel Kessler interview about Gilfoid: http://ekstrabladet.dk/sport/anden_spor ... 900275.ece
