Jamie Cox wins the Commonwealth title! Low blows?

Post Reply
plymouthskinhead
Cruiserweight
Posts: 119
Joined: 02 Nov 2010, 05:03

Jamie Cox wins the Commonwealth title! Low blows?

Post by plymouthskinhead »

I'm disgusted that Jamie Cox won the title tonight and despite having 2 points deducted he still manage a score of 119-113. OK, I know a judge has the disgression to agree or disagree with a referee's point deduction, but Stevie Wonder would have seen the low blows and there were plenty of them.

I call blatant robbery there, he was getting away with murder, the ref had a shocker IMHO... :oo :shame:
damianhucker1
Heavyweight
Heavyweight
Posts: 3071
Joined: 20 Sep 2008, 17:36

Re: Jamie Cox wins the Commonwealth title! Low blows?

Post by damianhucker1 »

plymouthskinhead wrote:I'm disgusted that Jamie Cox won the title tonight and despite having 2 points deducted he still manage a score of 119-113. OK, I know a judge has the disgression to agree or disagree with a referee's point deduction, but Stevie Wonder would have seen the low blows and there were plenty of them.

I call blatant robbery there, he was getting away with murder, the ref had a shocker IMHO... :oo :shame:
as did the judges
plymouthskinhead
Cruiserweight
Posts: 119
Joined: 02 Nov 2010, 05:03

Re: Jamie Cox wins the Commonwealth title! Low blows?

Post by plymouthskinhead »

damianhucker1 wrote:
plymouthskinhead wrote:I'm disgusted that Jamie Cox won the title tonight and despite having 2 points deducted he still manage a score of 119-113. OK, I know a judge has the disgression to agree or disagree with a referee's point deduction, but Stevie Wonder would have seen the low blows and there were plenty of them.

I call blatant robbery there, he was getting away with murder, the ref had a shocker IMHO... :oo :shame:
as did the judges
Correct, them too. :shame:
Post Reply