Anybody shine any light for me
Effectiveness
-
alexpaterson
- Heavyweight

- Posts: 4310
- Joined: 22 Feb 2009, 11:22
Effectiveness
I was reading up about dieting and I kept reading that dieting 6 days a week and having a day of eating whatever is very good for losing weight, any truth in this? Something about speeds up your metabolism.
Anybody shine any light for me
Anybody shine any light for me
-
TempleSlave
- Heavyweight

- Posts: 579
- Joined: 11 May 2008, 05:24
Re: Effectiveness
According to my sources it's meant to be one meal, not whole day.alexpaterson wrote:I was reading up about dieting and I kept reading that dieting 6 days a week and having a day of eating whatever is very good for losing weight, any truth in this? Something about speeds up your metabolism.
Anybody shine any light for me
There you go:
http://www.charlespoliquin.com/Articles ... lp_Yo.aspx
-
EddieShredder
- Heavyweight

Re: Effectiveness
Yeah, I've been recommended one meal, rather than a whole day too... 
-
dajuggernaut
- Heavyweight

- Posts: 441
- Joined: 22 Jul 2006, 22:43
Re: Effectiveness
I would imagine a whole day getting out of hand. I've heard 2 cheat meals a week is appropriate.
-
TempleSlave
- Heavyweight

- Posts: 579
- Joined: 11 May 2008, 05:24
Re: Effectiveness
Yea, OK Charles in his article says once every 4-6 days and he's pretty strict.dajuggernaut wrote:I would imagine a whole day getting out of hand. I've heard 2 cheat meals a week is appropriate.
-
dajuggernaut
- Heavyweight

- Posts: 441
- Joined: 22 Jul 2006, 22:43
Re: Effectiveness
I'm sure there are people who have 2 cheat meals a week that are strict, Charles way isn't the only way.TempleSlave wrote:Yea, OK Charles in his article says once every 4-6 days and he's pretty strict.dajuggernaut wrote:I would imagine a whole day getting out of hand. I've heard 2 cheat meals a week is appropriate.
-
TempleSlave
- Heavyweight

- Posts: 579
- Joined: 11 May 2008, 05:24
Re: Effectiveness
Not sure if you noticed but I've just said you're right, dude.dajuggernaut wrote:I'm sure there are people who have 2 cheat meals a week that are strict, Charles way isn't the only way.TempleSlave wrote:Yea, OK Charles in his article says once every 4-6 days and he's pretty strict.dajuggernaut wrote:I would imagine a whole day getting out of hand. I've heard 2 cheat meals a week is appropriate.
Once every 4 days = twice a week, right? I know many different trainers/nutritionists etc. C. Poliquin really knows his stuff. If he allows 2 cheat meals per week then for me it means that's strict enough and that's what I said.
However in above mentioned article he advices to test it as it may be individual to some degree. Meaning if something doesn't work then it needs to be changed.
Re: Effectiveness
Charles Poliquin does really know his stuff but he has the odd thing thats a bit out there. The articled linked by TempleSlave is a good one and I wouldn't oppose any of the suggestions within it. However, measuring body fat is far from an exact science and unless you have access to a BodPod or a DEXA scanner its not really going to provide you with any reliable data to work from. Like I said though, the article is spot on in terms of how to go about your cheat meals.
-
TempleSlave
- Heavyweight

- Posts: 579
- Joined: 11 May 2008, 05:24
Re: Effectiveness
Of course you cannot expect the body fat measurements to be perfectly accurate. However, in Poliquin's Bio Signature modulation method, it's about proportions between different sites on your body, and once you become fluent in measuring people with calipers, this method is pretty much spot on.GAV wrote:Charles Poliquin does really know his stuff but he has the odd thing thats a bit out there. The articled linked by TempleSlave is a good one and I wouldn't oppose any of the suggestions within it. However, measuring body fat is far from an exact science and unless you have access to a BodPod or a DEXA scanner its not really going to provide you with any reliable data to work from. Like I said though, the article is spot on in terms of how to go about your cheat meals.
Re: Effectiveness
Even with calipers, you would be hard pushed to notice a real difference in someone over the space of 6 days. It would take some very accurate digital calipers to pick out the small change that may occur in this time frame.TempleSlave wrote:Of course you cannot expect the body fat measurements to be perfectly accurate. However, in Poliquin's Bio Signature modulation method, it's about proportions between different sites on your body, and once you become fluent in measuring people with calipers, this method is pretty much spot on.GAV wrote:Charles Poliquin does really know his stuff but he has the odd thing thats a bit out there. The articled linked by TempleSlave is a good one and I wouldn't oppose any of the suggestions within it. However, measuring body fat is far from an exact science and unless you have access to a BodPod or a DEXA scanner its not really going to provide you with any reliable data to work from. Like I said though, the article is spot on in terms of how to go about your cheat meals.
The biosignature modulation method is a good one though and I know a few boxers who use it to great effect.
-
TempleSlave
- Heavyweight

- Posts: 579
- Joined: 11 May 2008, 05:24
Re: Effectiveness
Professional, manual calipers every time! Ideally paired up with experienced operator. And of course you can measure signifficant difference within 6 days providing you make significant change in your diet, training and rest. Give me an average, even fairly active 40 yr old chap (say he does say some steady, moderate pace cardio say 3x/week) who eats grains and sleeps 6 hours a night. I'll make him do one of my 40mins weight routine followed by 15 mins of sprints, 4x in a week, feed him properly and make him sleep 8-8.5 hours and he may lose 2% of b.f. that first week quite easily.GAV wrote:Even with calipers, you would be hard pushed to notice a real difference in someone over the space of 6 days. It would take some very accurate digital calipers to pick out the small change that may occur in this time frame.TempleSlave wrote:Of course you cannot expect the body fat measurements to be perfectly accurate. However, in Poliquin's Bio Signature modulation method, it's about proportions between different sites on your body, and once you become fluent in measuring people with calipers, this method is pretty much spot on.GAV wrote:Charles Poliquin does really know his stuff but he has the odd thing thats a bit out there. The articled linked by TempleSlave is a good one and I wouldn't oppose any of the suggestions within it. However, measuring body fat is far from an exact science and unless you have access to a BodPod or a DEXA scanner its not really going to provide you with any reliable data to work from. Like I said though, the article is spot on in terms of how to go about your cheat meals.
The biosignature modulation method is a good one though and I know a few boxers who use it to great effect.