Its not John Rawling....

Post Reply
stujones
Heavyweight
Heavyweight
Posts: 27489
Joined: 29 Aug 2003, 15:08

Its not John Rawling....

Post by stujones »

Its blooming Jim Neilly who appears to have jumped the BBC ship and joined ITV.

What are ITV thinking.

Oh well, better give him a chance.
stujones
Heavyweight
Heavyweight
Posts: 27489
Joined: 29 Aug 2003, 15:08

Post by stujones »

He didn't do that a bad job, but still cannot understand why ITV have plumped for him - with Steve Holdsworth and Jim Rosenthal working their last two shows. Are they going to try a different commentator for each show.

Perhaps Neilly's improvement has something to do with the statistician helping him out.

Some slight exaggerations in his commentatory the "great" Julien Lorcy?
The Law
Heavyweight
Heavyweight
Posts: 1948
Joined: 19 Feb 2005, 19:02

Post by The Law »

stujones wrote:Some slight exaggerations in his commentatory the "great" Julien Lorcy?
I was shocked when I heard that aswell :D

The way he said 'GREAT' was greatly exaggerated. He made Julien Lorcy sound like an all-time legend and a hall of famer :P
steve689
Heavyweight
Heavyweight
Posts: 9660
Joined: 20 Jan 2003, 13:50

Post by steve689 »

Yeah Arthur having Sinitsin in "a whole world of trouble" after a decent left hook in the third was a bit over the top as well. ITV are just using the early shows to try out new things, wasn't this the third different commentary team? I thought Steve Collins was going to take McGuigans place on SKY, i was impressed with his analysis the other night.
DavidPayne
Heavyweight
Heavyweight
Posts: 6248
Joined: 11 Mar 2004, 11:00

Post by DavidPayne »

John told DHB himself that Calzaghe is his first outing.
stujones
Heavyweight
Heavyweight
Posts: 27489
Joined: 29 Aug 2003, 15:08

Post by stujones »

steve689 wrote:Yeah Arthur having Sinitsin in "a whole world of trouble" after a decent left hook in the third was a bit over the top as well. ITV are just using the early shows to try out new things, wasn't this the third different commentary team? I thought Steve Collins was going to take McGuigans place on SKY, i was impressed with his analysis the other night.
Steve Collins did a decent job tonight although called Alex Arthur - Alex Stewart at least once.

Yes, if you would have heard that commentary with watching the fight you could have sworn that Arthur was on the verge of stopping him time and time again. However, it was on in the last round where Sinistin looked in serious trouble.
The Law
Heavyweight
Heavyweight
Posts: 1948
Joined: 19 Feb 2005, 19:02

Post by The Law »

Alex Stewart was the cutsman, and Collins kept on saying that he was doing a good job on the cuts. Nothing wrong with that

:box:
KOJOE90
Heavyweight
Heavyweight
Posts: 7461
Joined: 12 May 2002, 12:12

Post by KOJOE90 »

lawllb wrote:
stujones wrote:Some slight exaggerations in his commentatory the "great" Julien Lorcy?
I was shocked when I heard that aswell :D

The way he said 'GREAT' was greatly exaggerated. He made Julien Lorcy sound like an all-time legend and a hall of famer :P
Yeah I noticed that to.

The word 'great' must be the most overused name in Boxing.

Really gets on my nerves sometimes.
Hesketh Vampire
Heavyweight
Heavyweight
Posts: 399
Joined: 14 Jun 2005, 08:25

Post by Hesketh Vampire »

lawllb wrote:Alex Stewart was the cutsman, and Collins kept on saying that he was doing a good job on the cuts. Nothing wrong with that

:box:
Well actually he was talking about the cutsman, then he went back to talking about Arthur, hence the "Alex Stewart". At least it was only once, Jim Neilly spent the entire evening talking about "Alec Arthur".
stujones
Heavyweight
Heavyweight
Posts: 27489
Joined: 29 Aug 2003, 15:08

Post by stujones »

Hesketh Vampire wrote:
lawllb wrote:Alex Stewart was the cutsman, and Collins kept on saying that he was doing a good job on the cuts. Nothing wrong with that

:box:
Well actually he was talking about the cutsman, then he went back to talking about Arthur, hence the "Alex Stewart". At least it was only once, Jim Neilly spent the entire evening talking about "Alec Arthur".
I thought when talking about Arthur he said Stewart once, I don't want to be too critical of Neilly who is strongly rumoured to be a forum member. It was a better combination than Neilly and McKenzie but still thought Rosenthal was better the last time.

I have to say I was stunned when Matt Smith said "commentators are Jim Neilly" for two reasons 1) I thought Neilly would be working for tbe BBC because he is a good amateur commentator and also does other sports - and is an excellent Rugby commentator, I thought he was integral to BBC sport. 2) With the continued improvements made since the Khan vs Kindelan III match I really did think members of ITV sport might have been reading this forum or at least listening to the e-mails. With the criticisms we have given Jim "Howard Eastwood" Neilly in the past it is apparently not.
stujones
Heavyweight
Heavyweight
Posts: 27489
Joined: 29 Aug 2003, 15:08

Post by stujones »

I wonder is Neilly is actually a freelance and it was just a one off apparence. Rosenthal was with the F1 this morning so I doubt could have done the Boxing.
steve689
Heavyweight
Heavyweight
Posts: 9660
Joined: 20 Jan 2003, 13:50

Post by steve689 »

lawllb wrote:Alex Stewart was the cutsman, and Collins kept on saying that he was doing a good job on the cuts. Nothing wrong with that

:box:
Wasn't Terry Stewart the cutsman?
Post Reply