Billy Joe Saunders vs Hungarian Bum

wadey
Cruiserweight
Posts: 272
Joined: 01 Sep 2010, 07:00

Re: Billy Joe Saunders vs Hungarian Bum

Post by wadey »

JamesH wrote:An obvious opinion? Why, because it's yours? Because it is that of a majority? Come on, you must be capable of better than that? Or maybe not.

How about this for an insight.... I would say it's because I'm capable of my own thoughts and of forming my own opinion. I far prefer to be in that position than to be a sheep who echoes every moan and whinge everyone else cares to make. I like Frankie Gavin and James De Gale, that causes me a few problems on here, but usually only in debate. I used to like Eubank too, but I presume that's ok now as your cherished majority also do these days. Debating doesn't mean that anyone who disagrees with me is doing so for the sake of it or that they are wrong, I don't think I'd be as vain or paranoid to suggest such a thing. It would be a bit dull if I posted and the next posts were all just X2, X3, X4 etc.

And most of the users you refer to don't post under their real name.

I've been on here a while now and have never been dragged into as many arguments as I have recently. You used to be able to debate, disagree, and move on. The good posters are diminishing. Your type are on the increase. It's a shame, whatever the 'vast majority' might think.

Happy cheerleading :yay:
James, seriously mate I'm not interested in your insights, or how many arguements you get dragged into or writting you a story, as one of the behaviour traits for people like you is, that you will always have to have the last word.

Good luck with your crusade and mission to be recognised as a truly respected forum member, even if it means you have to purposely disagree with every one in the process.

Enjoy the fights tomorrow, I think Clev will win, so obviously i should imagine you think Bomber will win.
JamesH
Heavyweight
Heavyweight
Posts: 1897
Joined: 08 Aug 2008, 09:16

Re: Billy Joe Saunders vs Hungarian Bum

Post by JamesH »

:lol: :lol: :lol: :lol:

If you aren't interested in my insight, perhaps you shouldn't have posted:
May be you can give us an insight into what leads to behaviour like this?
And what a shock to see you go with the majority for tomorrow night.

:lol: :lol: :lol: :lol:

Oooh fingers crossed that's me getting the last word now.
Crazyboy
Cruiserweight
Posts: 1246
Joined: 12 Nov 2010, 11:56

Re: Billy Joe Saunders vs Hungarian Bum

Post by Crazyboy »

JamesH wrote:
wadey wrote:
JamesH wrote: He has one next month though, so it's a walkover or nothing. You can't expect him to take any major risks with another (better) fight in a few weeks.
Well don't stick him on the bill then, cos as i said it irritates Boxing fans and no one wants to see pointless fights like this against completely unknown Euro fighters.

Do you really feel differently? or just like to have a difference of opinion for the sake of it?
You don't speak for all boxing fans, muppet.

It irritates you and some others, while some other people think it's fine given his other fight a few weeks later. If you don't like people disagreeing with you, a forum probably isn't the right environment for you. I think it's a fairly pathetic comment you've made there, you probably realise that now yourself as you move onto some other whinging bandwagon.

I think some people like to moan and whinge for the 'sake of it'.
Sorry mate, but do you honestly think that BJS throwing what will probably be about 4 punches before the guy goes down, is going to help him keep sharp or get prepared for the bigger fight in a few weeks?

Pointless fight mate, surely you can see that.

In answer to Yid, he may as well be sat on his arse mate till next fight because he sure as hell ain;t going to learn owt from this one, and it certainly won't be any kind of workout either...
JamesH
Heavyweight
Heavyweight
Posts: 1897
Joined: 08 Aug 2008, 09:16

Re: Billy Joe Saunders vs Hungarian Bum

Post by JamesH »

To be honest mate, I never said it was a sterling match up and I don't expect Saunders to gain very much from it. I just don't really see the harm in it at this stage of his career. Fair enough if he didn't have a 'proper' fight lined up, but its only 3 weeks away. Either he or his team feel this will be beneficial for him and they are better placed than I to decide that. Maybe they want to build his record up a bit sharpish because of his previous set backs, he's only had 9 fights. I don't know. However, no one is going to be making a fortune for this particular bout and his real fight is in just 3 weeks, so for me, there just has to have been some reasoning behind it.
NazNaci1
Heavyweight
Heavyweight
Posts: 4517
Joined: 26 Mar 2009, 00:58

Re: Billy Joe Saunders vs Hungarian Bum

Post by NazNaci1 »

wadey wrote:I always fail to understand why promoters would rather bring over and cover the expenses of a poor eastern european fighter, rather than put them in with fighters from the UK, that would love a shot against a potential up and coming star like Billie Joe.
The purse offered, in all honesty.

Cheaper and with a fight in 3 weeks, makes sense. Business sense.
maverick23
Cruiserweight
Posts: 10375
Joined: 26 Feb 2011, 18:20

Re: Billy Joe Saunders vs Hungarian Bum

Post by maverick23 »

This is a pointless fight.

BJS won't learn anything from it, will stop the easily inside 3 rounds and will then comfortably beat Gary Boulden also.

If BJS was making a big step up against Boulden then you could almost excuse a 'gimmie' fight but i really don't think he is.
Post Reply