Techno89 wrote:I agree he's just not ready to fight anyone at the top level (But he does look a good prospect for the future)
The reason I would advise Fury to take his time is because I can't see him beating either of the Klitschko brothers. Vitali will probably retire next year (or at the latest 2013) & Wladimir could conceivably go on for another 5 years (until he's 40 - and maybe beyond that if he keeps himself in good nick).
If Fury fights either of the Klitschkos within the next 12-18 months, he would become the proverbial "
lamb to the slaughter" because he just isn't ready for them.
The thing about it is even if Tyson Fury beat top contenders (Adamek, Povetkin, Chambers, Arreola) he still would NOT be ready for either of the Klitschkos, they are just waaay ahead of everyone else (now that David Haye is gone).
A fight between Tyson & Wlad/Vitali would be great for the Ukrainians, it would be another challenger to their combined record,
but for Tyson ist would be bad because he would lose more thna his unbeaten record.
It means that if Tuyson does dominate the Heavyweight Division after the Klitchskos leave, people will just say: "oh, he's only on top because the brothers aint here no more".
Bottom line is: Tyson Fury should only fight the Klitschskos when he is ready: And by that I mean he tightens up his defence, and lerans to use his jab effectively to create distance between him and his opponent.
Going into the ring for a brawl is well & fine as a backup plan, but it's not sustainable as a long-term career strategy.
And actually, I would give the same advice to David Price.
