Alex Arthur v Boris Sinitsin

jomothepure
Heavyweight
Heavyweight
Posts: 2660
Joined: 24 Oct 2004, 08:43

Post by jomothepure »

Freiheit wrote:Limond has been appointed as mandatory challenger for Arthur.
Maybe Arthur will drop the domestic titles now then. Despite an improvement in Limmond I don't think a rematch would benefit either just now.
THEBUTCH
Heavyweight
Heavyweight
Posts: 6630
Joined: 27 Jan 2004, 08:51

Post by THEBUTCH »

Hmmm, that's a rematch that doesn't get my juices flowing. I mean, it was a pretty emphatic win for Arthur last time and even with more experience under his belt, I can't see Limond changing the result from last time.

If Arthur was to vacate the British, then Limond v Craig Docherty would be a decent scrap.
jomothepure
Heavyweight
Heavyweight
Posts: 2660
Joined: 24 Oct 2004, 08:43

Post by jomothepure »

THEBUTCH wrote: If Arthur was to vacate the British, then Limond v Craig Docherty would be a decent scrap.
Yup, surely the one that makes sense.
stujones
Heavyweight
Heavyweight
Posts: 27450
Joined: 29 Aug 2003, 15:08

Post by stujones »

Yeah, a good match that one - I would favour Docherty though. Perhaps Johannson should be involved aswell.
KOJOE90
Heavyweight
Heavyweight
Posts: 7461
Joined: 12 May 2002, 12:12

Post by KOJOE90 »

jomothepure wrote:
THEBUTCH wrote: If Arthur was to vacate the British, then Limond v Craig Docherty would be a decent scrap.
Yup, surely the one that makes sense.
I to would like to see this match 50/50 in my book.
Post Reply