Kell Brook to box on Froch v Ward undercard

dondada
Heavyweight
Heavyweight
Posts: 8872
Joined: 26 Nov 2003, 10:55

Kell Brook to box on Froch v Ward undercard

Post by dondada »

http://news.boxrec.com/news/2011/kell-b ... -undercard

This is just info...no need for this to degenerate into the usual sh1te.

OK? :lol:
johnswan1
Heavyweight
Heavyweight
Posts: 3348
Joined: 27 Feb 2005, 18:03

Re: Kell Brook to box on Froch v Ward undercard

Post by johnswan1 »

Brook is a class act and great to see him showcased in the stages on an event like this.
danfoster
Heavyweight
Heavyweight
Posts: 651
Joined: 02 Feb 2009, 05:07

Re: Kell Brook to box on Froch v Ward undercard

Post by danfoster »

Ian 'Mr' McNeilly wrote:http://news.boxrec.com/news/2011/kell-b ... -undercard

This is just info...no need for this to degenerate into the usual sh1te.

OK? :lol:
Where's Saxon?
twenty six
Heavyweight
Heavyweight
Posts: 3574
Joined: 17 Jun 2006, 13:43

Re: Kell Brook to box on Froch v Ward undercard

Post by twenty six »

Really looking forward to this.
Hopefully Kel can convert some of the doubters.
Surely the cynics amongst you are prepared to get behind a Brit showing his talent across the pond ?
danfoster
Heavyweight
Heavyweight
Posts: 651
Joined: 02 Feb 2009, 05:07

Re: Kell Brook to box on Froch v Ward undercard

Post by danfoster »

twenty six wrote:Really looking forward to this.
Hopefully Kel can convert some of the doubters.
Surely the cynics amongst you are prepared to get behind a Brit showing his talent across the pond ?
Mate, Kell could KO King Kong in Hong Kong and still certain people would slag him off! It's just the way it is with boxing in Britain.
gobbles
Heavyweight
Heavyweight
Posts: 2682
Joined: 18 Dec 2003, 15:04

Re: Kell Brook to box on Froch v Ward undercard

Post by gobbles »

danfoster wrote:
twenty six wrote:Really looking forward to this.
Hopefully Kel can convert some of the doubters.
Surely the cynics amongst you are prepared to get behind a Brit showing his talent across the pond ?
Mate, Kell could KO King Kong in Hong Kong and still certain people would slag him off! It's just the way it is with boxing in Britain.

King Kong was never a great traveller, though
dondada
Heavyweight
Heavyweight
Posts: 8872
Joined: 26 Nov 2003, 10:55

Re: Kell Brook to box on Froch v Ward undercard

Post by dondada »

gobbles wrote:
danfoster wrote:
twenty six wrote:Really looking forward to this.
Hopefully Kel can convert some of the doubters.
Surely the cynics amongst you are prepared to get behind a Brit showing his talent across the pond ?
Mate, Kell could KO King Kong in Hong Kong and still certain people would slag him off! It's just the way it is with boxing in Britain.

King Kong was never a great traveller, though
Didn't like planes, that's for sure
nobby_nobbins
Heavyweight
Heavyweight
Posts: 654
Joined: 22 Apr 2008, 16:07

Re: Kell Brook to box on Froch v Ward undercard

Post by nobby_nobbins »

Ian 'Mr' McNeilly wrote:
gobbles wrote:
danfoster wrote: Mate, Kell could KO King Kong in Hong Kong and still certain people would slag him off! It's just the way it is with boxing in Britain.

King Kong was never a great traveller, though
Didn't like planes, that's for sure
Yeah - King Kong was just one of a long string of fighters who got stuffed by biased officials away from home.
Chambers2
Heavyweight
Heavyweight
Posts: 6499
Joined: 24 Feb 2004, 07:24

Re: Kell Brook to box on Froch v Ward undercard

Post by Chambers2 »

I can't understand why Kell has got any detractors, he's a BAD BAD man who's gonna be sparking BIG name fighters for years :KO: :KO: :KO: :KO: .......... :KO: :KO: :KO:
gobbles
Heavyweight
Heavyweight
Posts: 2682
Joined: 18 Dec 2003, 15:04

Re: Kell Brook to box on Froch v Ward undercard

Post by gobbles »

Chambers2 wrote:I can't understand why Kell has got any detractors, he's a BAD BAD man who's gonna be sparking BIG name fighters for years :KO: :KO: :KO: :KO: .......... :KO: :KO: :KO:

Based on what?
Chambers2
Heavyweight
Heavyweight
Posts: 6499
Joined: 24 Feb 2004, 07:24

Re: Kell Brook to box on Froch v Ward undercard

Post by Chambers2 »

gobbles wrote:
Chambers2 wrote:I can't understand why Kell has got any detractors, he's a BAD BAD man who's gonna be sparking BIG name fighters for years :KO: :KO: :KO: :KO: .......... :KO: :KO: :KO:

Based on what?

:confused: his performances. You wait and see, I'm never wrong :yay:
bigB
Cruiserweight
Posts: 470
Joined: 24 Dec 2010, 08:13

Re: Kell Brook to box on Froch v Ward undercard

Post by bigB »

I'm saving my pennies and getting flights for this.

Should be a great night of boxing, get to see Froch Vs Ward too.
Deserter
Heavyweight
Heavyweight
Posts: 6441
Joined: 04 Sep 2003, 10:01

Re: Kell Brook to box on Froch v Ward undercard

Post by Deserter »

Ian 'Mr' McNeilly wrote:
gobbles wrote:
danfoster wrote: Mate, Kell could KO King Kong in Hong Kong and still certain people would slag him off! It's just the way it is with boxing in Britain.

King Kong was never a great traveller, though
Didn't like planes, that's for sure
That plane didn't even hit him, he took a dive :wink:
Lightsoot
Heavyweight
Heavyweight
Posts: 889
Joined: 13 Feb 2006, 07:11

Re: Kell Brook to box on Froch v Ward undercard

Post by Lightsoot »

It's very important that the right opponent is selected to make Brook look good / make for an entertaining fight.

Randall Bailey fits the bill perfectly.
Lightsoot
Heavyweight
Heavyweight
Posts: 889
Joined: 13 Feb 2006, 07:11

Re: Kell Brook to box on Froch v Ward undercard

Post by Lightsoot »

It's very important that the right opponent is selected to make Brook look good / make for an entertaining fight.

Randall Bailey fits the bill perfectly.
big lennox
Heavyweight
Heavyweight
Posts: 2550
Joined: 06 Feb 2004, 13:44

Re: Kell Brook to box on Froch v Ward undercard

Post by big lennox »

Great stuff. The Hearns are raising his profile and he is coming along nicely.Looking forward to this and watching Kell become a world champion.
Yes We Can
Cruiserweight
Posts: 2087
Joined: 29 Sep 2010, 17:16

Re: Kell Brook to box on Froch v Ward undercard

Post by Yes We Can »

Carson Jones anyone? thats my bet on opponent.

Would be a decent fight to take against an ever improving opponent with good ranking with IBF (Berto territory)
Jon Saxon
Heavyweight
Heavyweight
Posts: 1657
Joined: 22 Feb 2009, 16:16

Re: Kell Brook to box on Froch v Ward undercard

Post by Jon Saxon »

Ian 'Mr' McNeilly wrote:http://news.boxrec.com/news/2011/kell-b ... -undercard

This is just info...no need for this to degeneratento th :TU: e usual sh1te.
OK? :lol:
Feeling guilty about your article are we? :-)

Can't wait for him to fight someone good AND I hope he does well.

PS Dan my broadband is down but I'm at your mums getting my weekly biscut mate :TU:
danfoster
Heavyweight
Heavyweight
Posts: 651
Joined: 02 Feb 2009, 05:07

Re: Kell Brook to box on Froch v Ward undercard

Post by danfoster »

Jon Saxon wrote:
Ian 'Mr' McNeilly wrote:http://news.boxrec.com/news/2011/kell-b ... -undercard

This is just info...no need for this to degeneratento th :TU: e usual sh1te.
OK? :lol:
Feeling guilty about your article are we? :-)

Can't wait for him to fight someone good AND I hope he does well.

PS Dan my broadband is down but I'm at your mums getting my weekly biscut mate :TU:
You must be desperate mate.
Deno1986
Heavyweight
Heavyweight
Posts: 5349
Joined: 25 Jul 2009, 06:58

Re: Kell Brook to box on Froch v Ward undercard

Post by Deno1986 »

funtime wrote:Carson Jones anyone? thats my bet on opponent.

Would be a decent fight to take against an ever improving opponent with good ranking with IBF (Berto territory)
I thought of Jones aswell but it's rare enough that he fights outside of Oklahoma or Kansas and I'm not sure his manager, who posts on CS by the way, would risk his high ranking against Kell Brook unless it was for a title. I think Ben has made a very good call mentioning Randall Bailey - well known American opponent who still packs a punch. He is also the No.2 ranked contender for the IBF.
stujones
Heavyweight
Heavyweight
Posts: 27513
Joined: 29 Aug 2003, 15:08

Re: Kell Brook to box on Froch v Ward undercard

Post by stujones »

Ben Carey wrote:It's very important that the right opponent is selected to make Brook look good / make for an entertaining fight.

Randall Bailey fits the bill perfectly.
Yes, a part of me might think Bailey has too big a punch to risk it.... but then, hey, if people have faith in Brook he will have to face a puncher someday in his career.... just like Khan had too.

I think he has another fight lined up though..... got a hunch he has been nominated for an eliminator for a world title fight, or a silver title fight or something like that.

Others that can provide some good action, and a bit of a name..... Edner Cherry (too small though surely), Michael "No Joke" Stewart (usually durable, good workrate very beatable),

Grady Brewer (if he can make 147) is basically a faded fighter with a decent recent form line - although he lost his last one.
stujones
Heavyweight
Heavyweight
Posts: 27513
Joined: 29 Aug 2003, 15:08

Re: Kell Brook to box on Froch v Ward undercard

Post by stujones »

King Geedorah wrote:It is too short notice for any of the fellow contenders. I am looking forward to seeing Kell fight in the US, and it is good for his exposure, but cannot see anything but him punching holes in a journeyman or badly faded former contender. Hope to be proven wrong.
Yeah, especially as the chances it being on US TV is slim. The super 6 series hasn't exactly been noted for quality undercard.

It will be good for exposure, but I feel better exposure opportunities will lie ahead. Witter vs Ndou (off US TV) didn't do Junior much good in terms of getting the big names. Still ended up fighting for a vacant title in a leisure centre or something like that.
Lenny
Heavyweight
Heavyweight
Posts: 3656
Joined: 27 Nov 2003, 05:31

Re: Kell Brook to box on Froch v Ward undercard

Post by Lenny »

King Geedorah wrote:
stujones wrote:
King Geedorah wrote:It is too short notice for any of the fellow contenders. I am looking forward to seeing Kell fight in the US, and it is good for his exposure, but cannot see anything but him punching holes in a journeyman or badly faded former contender. Hope to be proven wrong.
Yeah, especially as the chances it being on US TV is slim. The super 6 series hasn't exactly been noted for quality undercard.

It will be good for exposure, but I feel better exposure opportunities will lie ahead. Witter vs Ndou (off US TV) didn't do Junior much good in terms of getting the big names. Still ended up fighting for a vacant title in a leisure centre or something like that.
Witter-N’Dou was two steps back for Junior as it turned people off him. Kell’s style is far more pleasing, he’s raised his profile with some good punditry work and while he is calling for a higher profile British rival he is doing it in a way that wins people over rather than alienates them.

Kell iss Witter 2.0. They’ve worked out the bugs and are putting the finishing touches to the Beta testing process before rolling him out for mass consumption.
Could have been so different. Witter looked fantastic for the first few rounds but then obviously decided to save his energy (break his hand, whatever) to enable him to do a flip at the end. If he'd have managed to keep N'Dou down it might have caused a slight stir

Bailey could be fun to watch but would you want to mess around against someone that powerful? Risk v reward it doesn't look good
h smithy
Heavyweight
Heavyweight
Posts: 82
Joined: 26 Mar 2010, 08:25

Re: Kell Brook to box on Froch v Ward undercard

Post by h smithy »

stujones wrote:
King Geedorah wrote:It is too short notice for any of the fellow contenders. I am looking forward to seeing Kell fight in the US, and it is good for his exposure, but cannot see anything but him punching holes in a journeyman or badly faded former contender. Hope to be proven wrong.
Yeah, especially as the chances it being on US TV is slim. The super 6 series hasn't exactly been noted for quality undercard.

It will be good for exposure, but I feel better exposure opportunities will lie ahead. Witter vs Ndou (off US TV) didn't do Junior much good in terms of getting the big names. Still ended up fighting for a vacant title in a leisure centre or something like that.

Exposure ain't going to be be great as I can't see any chance of getting Kell on US tv on this date, surely showtime are going to spend the hour or so they allocate for the boxing to be all about Ward vs Froch, if they show any of the undercard it is going to a US fighter, unless Kell is up against a well know unbeaten US fighter and can't see that happening.
wrimc
Heavyweight
Heavyweight
Posts: 680
Joined: 11 Apr 2010, 14:36

Re: Kell Brook to box on Froch v Ward undercard

Post by wrimc »

Exposure isnt just about about being on the television mate. Its about being out there showing your face. Lobbying people who are in the know tv execs journos promoters to get behind him give him a shot in the US or in the UK. If Kell goes over there and scores an impressive victory even if it isnt against an impressive opponent it not only gives hi experience on a big bill but might make people or the "important" people those I mentioned previously take notice.

Barry Hearn used to do this all the time take a fighter over to the States even just to have him ringside at a rivals bout it gets his name out there makes people aware of him and that he is interested and means business.
Post Reply