http://www.secondsout.com/UK/pluk.cfm?ccs=338&cs=17007
Oh please - more shameless Roman Greenberg promotion
-
Hesketh Vampire
- Heavyweight

- Posts: 399
- Joined: 14 Jun 2005, 08:25
Oh please - more shameless Roman Greenberg promotion
I know they must be having their arms twisted at SecondsOut.com, but this kind of tosh is stretching journalistic integrity a wee bit far. Yeah, HBO have been watching Greenberg closely....
http://www.secondsout.com/UK/pluk.cfm?ccs=338&cs=17007
http://www.secondsout.com/UK/pluk.cfm?ccs=338&cs=17007
-
Twinkle Toes
- Heavyweight

- Posts: 3340
- Joined: 22 Sep 2003, 08:38
-
Hesketh Vampire
- Heavyweight

- Posts: 399
- Joined: 14 Jun 2005, 08:25
The sad thing is I have always enjoyed the editorials at SecondsOut, and they have some very good writers such as Thomas Hauser on the books. But the shameless promotion of Greenberg is going beyond a joke and rubbishes their journalistic integrity. No other writers are getting even remotely excited about Greenberg, and it seems his microscopic steps up in class are only serving to expose a worrying lack of power.
-
pasty_spud
- Heavyweight

- Posts: 338
- Joined: 20 Feb 2005, 04:22
I agree I used to post on their forum a lot, but then it just disapeared one day with not one single word.Twinkle Toes wrote:They shit out when they had a forum with not so much as a word of warning to their users - You don't treat your users like that..
They could not even be bothered to answer my e-mails when I asked them if it was coming back. So I thought screw them and I almost never visit the site now.
Yes thats what I allways assumed anyway. But they could at least have given their members some sort of explanation instead of treating us like crap.nickd wrote:I think it was taken down due to a complaint from Allegedly if I recall correctly. I think he was threatening to sue them over some of the content on the forum wasnt he?
So they can shove their site as far as I am concerned.
-
jomothepure
- Heavyweight

- Posts: 2660
- Joined: 24 Oct 2004, 08:43
I've been trying to put it off but have just read the article.
I got to paragraph 2 before falling off my chair and fainting.
"The talented young pretender...potentially the first ever billion dollar boxer...has been matched like any other serious contender-learning his trade against good solid journeyman types"
[/i]
I got to paragraph 2 before falling off my chair and fainting.
"The talented young pretender...potentially the first ever billion dollar boxer...has been matched like any other serious contender-learning his trade against good solid journeyman types"
[/i]
-
Hesketh Vampire
- Heavyweight

- Posts: 399
- Joined: 14 Jun 2005, 08:25
Re: Oh please - more shameless Roman Greenberg promotion
HBO are interested in Greenberg and initial talks have taken place.Hesketh Vampire wrote:I know they must be having their arms twisted at SecondsOut.com, but this kind of tosh is stretching journalistic integrity a wee bit far. Yeah, HBO have been watching Greenberg closely....![]()
http://www.secondsout.com/UK/pluk.cfm?ccs=338&cs=17007
Greenberg will be with HBO in less than 2 years.
They are doing nothing that allegedly isnt in his NOTW column.Hesketh Vampire wrote:The sad thing is I have always enjoyed the editorials at SecondsOut, and they have some very good writers such as Thomas Hauser on the books. But the shameless promotion of Greenberg is going beyond a joke and rubbishes their journalistic integrity. No other writers are getting even remotely excited about Greenberg, and it seems his microscopic steps up in class are only serving to expose a worrying lack of power.
-
jamesmcdonnell
- Heavyweight

- Posts: 45229
- Joined: 12 Nov 2003, 06:11
-
jamesmcdonnell
- Heavyweight

- Posts: 45229
- Joined: 12 Nov 2003, 06:11
No I agree, I think that it's pretty shocking that a major national newspaper allows their sole boxing commentary to come from someone with a vested interest who basically uses it as a platform to promote his own fighters will slagging off everyone else. However as I said it's clear that it is allegedly speaking, whereas at Secondsout, it's not clear that it is being put on the agenda by the owners of the site.
Actually, to be fair, it is in the secondsout.tv section, so anyone with sense should be able to tell that it is in effect a press release.
Ahh, I see it's the piece by Bernath people are on about.
Actually, to be fair, it is in the secondsout.tv section, so anyone with sense should be able to tell that it is in effect a press release.
Ahh, I see it's the piece by Bernath people are on about.
-
BunglesFingers
- Heavyweight

but he is only 23. i dont think there is anything too untoward going on here, he is keeping busy and learning his trade, they have said now they will start to step him up, and if they are true to their word they will do so.
if they dont then yes, criticism is valid, buit i think at this point they know exactly what has been going on, he isnt saying he has beaten genuine live contenders, more learning what style suits him best and gaining experience, the guy keeps busy even if it is against below par opponents, but Valuev was hardly fighting grade A opposition in his first 20 fights was he?
However its now stated they are going to step him up, so they should do so.
There could be more to this than I know but I think a lot of the criticism above is unwarranted,
He is obviously a boxer more than brawler and this style as we know tends to have a longer shelf life, this aside from the fact that he isnt big enough as yet to be threat, as he gets older this may not be such an issue as you naturally bulk up and get bigger.
As i say, if they step him up now then i have no criticism to give, i think he has been handled cautiously but not as bad as is being made out here.
if they dont then yes, criticism is valid, buit i think at this point they know exactly what has been going on, he isnt saying he has beaten genuine live contenders, more learning what style suits him best and gaining experience, the guy keeps busy even if it is against below par opponents, but Valuev was hardly fighting grade A opposition in his first 20 fights was he?
However its now stated they are going to step him up, so they should do so.
There could be more to this than I know but I think a lot of the criticism above is unwarranted,
He is obviously a boxer more than brawler and this style as we know tends to have a longer shelf life, this aside from the fact that he isnt big enough as yet to be threat, as he gets older this may not be such an issue as you naturally bulk up and get bigger.
As i say, if they step him up now then i have no criticism to give, i think he has been handled cautiously but not as bad as is being made out here.
-
jamesmcdonnell
- Heavyweight

- Posts: 45229
- Joined: 12 Nov 2003, 06:11
yip agreed but he may add power as he gets older, at the end of the day lack of power didnt hold Chris Byrd back, albeit Byrd had stellar skills for a heavy.jamesmcdonnell wrote:Greenburg is quick, has good balance, but I don't think he has enough power to do anything special.
just reckon we should give the lad a break and see who he is fighting next before we write him off. just my take.
Seems weird to me that we run down likable guys with good groundings, and possible bright futures, rather than the established stars who mouth off and dont back it up in the ring.
-
Bard of Boxrec
- Heavyweight

- Posts: 13114
- Joined: 22 Feb 2002, 20:00
-
jamesmcdonnell
- Heavyweight

- Posts: 45229
- Joined: 12 Nov 2003, 06:11
I've got nothing against the bloke, just don't rate him is all. He doesn't seem to use any sound fundamentals, and jinks around the ring like Roy Jones, and you've got to be fornicating good to get away with that against big committed punchers.J wrote:yip agreed but he may add power as he gets older, at the end of the day lack of power didnt hold Chris Byrd back, albeit Byrd had stellar skills for a heavy.jamesmcdonnell wrote:Greenburg is quick, has good balance, but I don't think he has enough power to do anything special.
just reckon we should give the lad a break and see who he is fighting next before we write him off. just my take.
Seems weird to me that we run down likable guys with good groundings, and possible bright futures, rather than the established stars who mouth off and dont back it up in the ring.